18 and older, any sex, with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation or Ventricular Tachycardia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Rate of Subjects With Acute SuccessPrimary· Immediate post procedure
The rate of acute success is defined as the percent of subjects who received HD Grid mapping and RF energy delivery according to label resulting in acute termination of clinical arrhythmia, defined by termination to sinus rhythm (SR) (or AT if being treated for PersAF) or non-inducibility of clinical arrhythmia after ablation (cardioversion allowed prior to inducibility attempt).
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
287
VT Subjects
14
Rate of Subjects With Long-term SuccessPrimary· PersAF (12 months), VT (6-months)
For PersAF, the rate of long-term success rate is defined as the percent of subjects who receive HD Grid mapping and RF energy delivery according to label and have had freedom from all atrial arrhythmias (AF/AFL/AT) greater than 30 seconds (as documented by 48-hr Holter at 12-month follow-up) and a new or increased dose in class I/III antiarrhythmic drug (AAD). For VT, the percent of subjects who receive HD Grid mapping and RF energy delivery according to label and have had freedom from recurrence of sustained monomorphic VT and a new or increase dose in class I/III AAD at 6-month follow-up. T
Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence and new or increased dose of class I/III AAD
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
168
VT Subjects
14
Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence on or off class I/III AAD
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
173
VT Subjects
14
Overall Procedure TimeSecondary· During procedure
Overall procedure time is defined as time from initial catheter insertion to final catheter removal.
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
134.3
± 51.3
VT Subjects
174.1
± 54.2
AFL Subjects
171.4
± 60.3
Radiofrequency (RF) TimeSecondary· During Procedure
Defined as duration of time RF energy is delivered
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
32.0
± 23.2
VT Subjects
35.1
± 30.5
AFL Subjects
37.6
± 36.8
Fluoroscopy TimeSecondary· During Procedure
Defined as total time subject is exposed to fluoroscopy
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
14.5
± 11.3
VT Subjects
31.3
± 17.4
AFL Subjects
13.7
± 10.6
Mapping Time Associated With Mapping ArrhythmiaSecondary· During Procedure
Defined as the total mapping time for the creation of each map (including any new or retrospective map created with Manual, AutoMap, and TurboMap mapping)
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
12.8
± 8.8
Atrial Flutter
13.6
± 11.8
Ventricular Tachycardia
20.6
± 15.3
Other
7.3
± 5.6
Number of Mapping Points CollectedSecondary· During Procedure
Defined as total number of mapping points collected for the creation of each map.
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
10150.8
± 8390.4
Atrial Flutter
10533.1
± 11282.8
Ventricular Tachycardia
16496.2
± 17207.5
Other
3902.5
± 4125.0
Number of Used Mapping Points Per MinuteSecondary· During Procedure
Defined as the total number of mapping points used divided by the relative mapping time
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
203.2
± 172.0
Atrial Flutter
170.8
± 157.5
Ventricular Tachycardia
81.9
± 50.7
Other
180.1
± 199.9
Substrate Characteristics IdentifiedSecondary· During Procedure
For each type of arrhythmogenic substrate this will be defined as the frequency of substrate type identified in cases that attempted to identify the specific substrate.
Low Voltage
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
263
VT Subjects
19
AFL Subjects
42
Fibrosis/Scar
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
117
VT Subjects
17
AFL Subjects
34
Focal Impulses
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
8
VT Subjects
0
AFL Subjects
4
Rotors
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
4
VT Subjects
0
AFL Subjects
1
Complex Fractionated Electrograms (CFE)
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
52
VT Subjects
2
AFL Subjects
9
Other
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
48
VT Subjects
4
AFL Subjects
8
Map Type Used to Define Ablation StrategySecondary· During Procedure
Defined by both the type of map used to define ablation strategy and the frequency each ablation strategy/target was used by physicians.
Peak-to-Peak
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
322
Atrial Flutter
9
Ventricular Tachycardia
24
Other
12
Local Activation Time (LAT)
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
47
Atrial Flutter
42
Ventricular Tachycardia
13
Other
19
CFE Mean
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
32
Atrial Flutter
0
Ventricular Tachycardia
1
Other
0
Fractionation
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
9
Atrial Flutter
1
Ventricular Tachycardia
0
Other
0
Peak-Negative
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
3
Atrial Flutter
0
Ventricular Tachycardia
0
Other
0
Role of HD Wave Solution Configuration Relative to Standard Configuration in Ablation Strategy Decision.Secondary· During Procedure
Assessed by physician survey comparing maps generated with HD Wave electrode configuration to along-the-spline (standard) electrode configurations.
HD Wave Solution compared to standard configuration
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
187
Atrial Flutter
24
Ventricular Tachycardia
28
Other
10
Differences Identified - Overall
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
117
Atrial Flutter
12
Ventricular Tachycardia
16
Other
5
Type of Differences - Location of Low Voltage
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
69
Atrial Flutter
8
Ventricular Tachycardia
5
Other
1
Type of Differences - Surface Area of Low Voltage
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
70
Atrial Flutter
8
Ventricular Tachycardia
15
Other
0
Type of Differences - Activation time/sequence
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
4
Atrial Flutter
3
Ventricular Tachycardia
0
Other
4
Type of Differences - Fractionation
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
33
Atrial Flutter
1
Ventricular Tachycardia
1
Other
0
Type of Differences - Presence of additional diagnostic signals
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
1
Atrial Flutter
0
Ventricular Tachycardia
0
Other
0
Type of Differences - Other
Group
Value
95% CI
Persistent AF
3
Atrial Flutter
0
Ventricular Tachycardia
1
Other
0
Maneuverability of HD Grid CatheterSecondary· During Procedure
Defined as the ability to maneuver the HD Grid to each specified anatomic location if attempted, the ability to contact cardiac tissue, and the incidence of induced ectopic beats during maneuvering.
Attempted to make contact with cardiac wall
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
333
VT Subjects
20
Sufficient contact all of the time (100%)
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
67
VT Subjects
0
Sufficient contact most of the time (91-99%)
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
233
VT Subjects
5
Sufficient contact some of the time (52-90%)
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
33
VT Subjects
15
Sufficient contact occasionally (11-50%)
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
0
VT Subjects
0
Sufficient contact rarely (0-10%)
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
0
VT Subjects
0
Difficult reaching a specific area of the heart with HD Grid
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
70
VT Subjects
7
Difficulty reaching Left Atrium
Group
Value
95% CI
PersAF Subjects
66
VT Subjects
0
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: 12 months.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The aim of this study is to quantify and characterize the outcomes of radiofrequency (RF) ablation after, and the utility of electroanatomical mapping with the Advisor™ HD Grid Mapping Catheter, Sensor Enabled™ (hereafter called "HD Grid") and EnSite Precision™ Cardiac Mapping System (SV 2.2 or higher, hereafter called "EnSite Precision") with HD Wave Solution™ voltage mapping (hereafter called "HD Wave Solution") in subjects with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) in real-world clinical settings.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Other recruiting trials for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07298473 — Conquer-AF Protocol for Redo Ablation Procedures in Recurrent Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using the Sp
· NA
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Abbott Medical Devices
Last refreshed: 16 April 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03733392.