Adults 18 to 20, female only, with Sexual Violence. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change From Baseline in Sexual Violence Victimization at 6-months Follow-upPrimary· Baseline to 6-months
Sexual assault victimization was assessed with Revised Sexual Experience Survey. Participants were asked how often they experienced 7 unwanted sexual experiences. Also, the tactic that was used ("using force") was also noted. Response options ranged from 0 (never) to 3 (3+times). An overall score for the SES, was calculated by summing each outcome and tactic score ("SOTS") with a range from 0 to 135- with higher scores indicating more sexual violence victimization. The 2nd method combines several of the outcomes, but keeps tactics separate, resulting in a potential range of 0 to 63.
Baseline score of "SOTS"
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
5.64
± 15.67
Stress and Mood Management
5.68
± 17.10
6-Month score of "SOTS"
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
5.52
± 18.4
Stress and Mood Management
8.15
± 25.36
Baseline score of "COSTS"
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
3.69
± 8.93
Stress and Mood Management
3.78
± 9.77
6-Month score of "COSTS"
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
3.52
± 10.55
Stress and Mood Management
4.95
± 13.63
Change From Baseline in Alcohol Protective Behaviors at 6 MonthsSecondary· Baseline to 6 months
Alcohol protective behaviors was measured by a scale developed by Martens et al., 2005 that included 15 protective strategies (e.g.., "alternate alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks") that asked participants if they had engaged in within the last 3 months. with response options of Never (1) to Always (5). Responses were summed across the 15 items. Potential range was 15 to 75. Higher scores indicated MORE protective strategies were used.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
53.53
± 12.17
Stress and Mood Management
53.97
± 11.35
6 months
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
56.8
± 11.7
Stress and Mood Management
55.0
± 11.6
Change From Baseline in Dating Risk Behaviors at 6-months Follow-upSecondary· Baseline to 6 months
Dating Risk Behaviors were measured by the Dating Behavior Survey created by Hanson \& Gidycz, 1993. The scale consists of 15 items that assess different situational variables (e.g., "consuming alcohol on the first date") that have been found to be related to sexual violence victimization. Participants are asked to respond how often they have engaged in the behavior on the first few dates with a new partner. Response options ranged from Never (1) to Always (5). Scores are summed and higher scores indicate engaging in MORE risk behaviors. Overall scores can range from 15 to 75.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
35.16
± 5.11
Stress and Mood Management
35.08
± 4.80
6 months
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
36.2
± 7.3
Stress and Mood Management
36.1
± 5.7
Change From Baseline in "Number of Times Engaged in Binge Drinking" to 6-monthsSecondary· Baseline to 6-months
Participants were asked at baseline and at 6-month follow-up, to report: "In the past 30 days, the number of times four or more drinks were consumed in one setting."
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
1.71
± 2.53
Stress and Mood Management
1.25
± 1.8
6 months
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
1.11
± 1.8
Stress and Mood Management
1.05
± 1.8
Change From Baseline in "Average Number of Alcoholic Drinks Per Occasion in Last 30 Days" to 6-monthsSecondary· baseline to 6-months
Participants were asked at baseline and at 6-month follow-up to report, "the average number of alcoholic drinks consumed per occasion in the last 30 days."
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
1.64
± 1.3
Stress and Mood Management
1.45
± 1.12
6 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
1.4
± 1.2
Stress and Mood Management
1.3
± 1.3
Change From Baseline in Bystander Behavior at 6-monthsSecondary· Baseline to 6-months
Bystander behavior was assessed using the 20-item Bystander Behavior Scale. Items assessed whether participants engaged in bystander behaviors in the past three months and included items such as, "If I saw someone taking a very intoxicated person up to their room, I said something and asked what the friend was doing." Higher scores indicate a better outcome of engaging in more prosocial behaviors. Min value=0; Max value=60.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
7.14
± 9.02
Stress and Mood Management
6.58
± 9.03
6 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
RealConsent
6.03
± 8.1
Stress and Mood Management
7.6
± 11.14
Sponsor's own description
This study evaluates the efficacy of a web-based program for female college freshmen ("RealConsent") in reducing their risk of sexual violence victimization. Half the participants will receive RealConsent-F and half will receive an attention-placebo control ("Stress and Mood Management").
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Georgia State University
Last refreshed: 13 February 2023
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03726437.