Adults 18 to 70, any sex, with Myopia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Overall Comfort ScoresPrimary· 1-week Follow-up
Overall comfort was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
Group
Value
95% CI
Test
59.9
± 24.21
Control
60.8
± 24.69
Overall Vision ScoresPrimary· 1-week Follow-up
Overall vision was assessed using the CLUE questionnaire. CLUE is a validated PRO questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using IRT follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
Group
Value
95% CI
Test
64.2
± 20.06
Control
66.5
± 19.94
Average Daily Wear TimeSecondary· 1-week Follow-up
Average daily wear time was calculated as the number of hours between subjects reported time of insertion and time of removal of the study lenses, on an average day, at 1-week follow-up evaluation. Higher wear times indicate better lens performance. The average wear time was reported for each lens type.
Visual performance was calculated as monocular contact lens-corrected distance visual acuity using a logMAR visual acuity scale. This was evaluated under low luminance and high contrast conditions (LLHC) at 4 meters from Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at the 1-week follow-up visit. Lower visual performance values indicate better vision. Two measurements were performed for each eye at 1-week follow-up. The average visual performance was reported for each lens type.
Visual performance was calculated as monocular contact lens-corrected distance visual acuity using a logMAR visual acuity scale. This was evaluated under high luminance and low contrast conditions (HLLC) at 4 meters from Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at the 1-week follow-up visit. Lower visual performance values indicate better vision. Two measurements were performed for each eye at 1-week follow-up. The average visual performance was reported for each lens type.
Group
Value
95% CI
Test
0.062
± 0.1209
Control
0.065
± 0.1176
Sponsor's own description
This study is a multi-site, group sequential, adaptive, randomized, double-masked, 2×2 crossover design, 1-week dispensing study. Subjects will wear bilaterally both Test and Control lenses in a random order for 1-week each as a daily disposable modality with a wash-out period of 1 week between the wearing periods.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Last refreshed: 27 April 2022
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03701516.