18 and older, any sex, with Burnout, Professional or Anxiety. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Feasibility of Attending the Yoga ProgramPrimary· Post-program
Participants were ask to rate the feasibility of attending the yoga program on a visual analogue scale from 0 (not at all feasible) to 100 (very feasible). Only the intervention group rated feasibility since the control group was a waitlist control group and did not attend the program. The standard deviation of the mean score was calculated.
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
28.9
± 25.6
Difference in BurnoutSecondary· Post-program and 2-month follow-up
Maslach Burnout Inventory (short form, 2 items) - scores from 0-12; higher is more burnout
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
6.23
± 0.52
No-treatment Control Arm
6.33
± 0.92
Post-program
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
5.65
± 0.50
No-treatment Control Arm
6.83
± 0.66
2-month follow-up
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
5.72
± 0.53
No-treatment Control Arm
6.43
± 0.99
Difference in Professional FulfillmentSecondary· Baseline, post-program, and 2-month follow-up
Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI; 16 items) - scores from 0-4 for professional fulfillment scale; higher is more fulfillment
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
1.70
± 0.12
No-treatment Control Arm
1.53
± 0.18
Post-program
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
1.35
± 0.14
No-treatment Control Arm
1.48
± 0.20
2-month follow-up
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
1.38
± 0.10
No-treatment Control Arm
1.56
± 0.21
Difference in Resident Well-beingSecondary· Baseline, post-program, and 2-month follow-up
Resident Well-Being Index (7 items) - scores from 0-7; higher is worse wellbeing
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
4.19
± 0.30
No-treatment Control Arm
4.08
± 0.58
Post-program
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
3.15
± 0.33
No-treatment Control Arm
3.62
± 0.35
2-month follow-up
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
3.40
± 0.37
No-treatment Control Arm
3.25
± 0.49
Difference in ResilienceSecondary· Baseline, post-program, and 2-month follow-up
Resilience Scale (RS-14; 14 items) - scores from 14-98; higher more resilience
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
70.61
± 2.26
No-treatment Control Arm
71.20
± 3.14
Post-program
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
76.32
± 1.79
No-treatment Control Arm
72.07
± 3.02
2-month follow-up
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
72.61
± 1.76
No-treatment Control Arm
72.43
± 3.22
Difference in MindfulnessSecondary· Baseline, post-program, and 2-month follow-up
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ; short form, 15 items) - scores from 15-75; higher score means more mindfulness
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
48.54
± 1.14
No-treatment Control Arm
48.60
± 1.92
Post-program
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
54.27
± 1.42
No-treatment Control Arm
49.73
± 1.54
2-month follow-up
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
51.83
± 0.99
No-treatment Control Arm
48.56
± 1.49
Difference in StressSecondary· Baseline, post-program, and 2-month follow-up
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; 10 items) - scores from 0-40; higher is more stress
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
19.74
± 1.09
No-treatment Control Arm
20.69
± 1.88
Post-program
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
16.15
± 1.38
No-treatment Control Arm
18.23
± 1.36
2-month follow-up
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
16.52
± 0.85
No-treatment Control Arm
18.88
± 1.90
Difference in DepressionSecondary· Baseline, post-program, and 2-month follow-up
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression (short form: depression-4) - scores from 4-20, higher is more depression
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
7.56
± 0.64
No-treatment Control Arm
7.15
± 1.13
Post-program
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
6.48
± 0.54
No-treatment Control Arm
7.23
± 0.75
2-month follow-up
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
7.24
± 0.61
No-treatment Control Arm
7.81
± 0.94
Difference in Sleep QualitySecondary· Baseline, post-program, and 2-month follow-up
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance (short form, 4 items) - scores from 4-20, higher is more sleep disturbance
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
10.38
± 0.62
No-treatment Control Arm
11.62
± 1.28
Post-program
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
8.73
± 0.59
No-treatment Control Arm
9.92
± 0.91
2-month follow-up
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
8.96
± 0.61
No-treatment Control Arm
8.50
± 1.02
Difference in AnxietySecondary· Baseline, post-program, and 2-month follow-up
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety (short form: anxiety-4) - scores from 4-20, higher is more anxiety
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
9.65
± 0.60
No-treatment Control Arm
10.00
± 1.00
Post-program
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
8.54
± 0.59
No-treatment Control Arm
9.15
± 0.94
2-month follow-up
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
8.96
± 0.57
No-treatment Control Arm
7.94
± 0.81
Differences in Professional Fulfillment - Burnout Sub-ItemSecondary· Baseline, post-program, and 2-month follow-up
Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI; 16 items) - scores from 0-4 for the burnout scale; higher is more burnout
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
2.26
± 0.13
No-treatment Control Arm
1.97
± 0.23
Post-program
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
2.47
± 0.15
No-treatment Control Arm
2.13
± 0.19
2-month follow-up
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention (Yoga) Arm
2.31
± 0.11
No-treatment Control Arm
2.02
± 0.22
Sponsor's own description
The investigators aim to initiate and complete the first investigation of the effect of a yoga-based program on resident physicians' psychological health using a randomized controlled trial to assess feasibility of the program in this population and measure outcomes across several domains. To meet the goals of the proposed project the investigators have identified 3 specific aims:
Specific Aim 1: Assess the acceptability and feasibility of the yoga program through measuring participation and conducting standardized interviews with a subset of yoga participants.
Specific Aim 2: Evaluate the effect of the yoga program on resident physicians' stress, burnout, resilience, mindfulness, mood, depression, anxiety, and sleep quality using quantitative self-report measures.
Specific Aim 3. Examine whether outcome measures were perceived as relevant to the participants' work environment and were not burdensome as to the length and content of the program.
Publications & conference data
3 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Brigham and Women's Hospital
Last refreshed: 23 July 2020
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03687450.