Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT03682328
Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty in Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Fractures.
NA trial testing vertebroplasty in Osteoporotic Fracture of Vertebra in 23 participants. Status unknown.
1 August 2020
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Assiut University |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Status unknown |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | single |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 23 |
| Start date | 1 October 2018 |
| Primary completion | 1 August 2020 |
| Estimated completion | 1 September 2020 |
Drugs / interventions tested
- vertebroplasty
- kyphoplaty
Conditions studied
- Osteoporotic Fracture of Vertebra — all drugs for Osteoporotic Fracture of Vertebra →
Sponsor
Assiut University
Who can join
60 and older, any sex, with Osteoporotic Fracture of Vertebra. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Vertebral body fractures are a major health care problem in all countries with incidence 1.4%. They are a common cause of severe debilitating pain, with consequent deteriorated quality of life, physical function and psychosocial performance. Surgery is indicated in patients with vertebral body fracture, and concurrent spinal instability or neurologic deficit. The cornerstone of management for vertebral body fractures without neurological impairment is medical therapy, which include analgesics, bed rest, orthoses and rehabilitation. In the majority of patients such treatment modalities are effective. However, conservative management measures are not indicated for every type of fracture. For example, in older patients with vertebral fractures and cardio-respiratory disease it is not possible to prescribe bedrest for long period. Moreover, sometimes anti-inflammatory drugs are poorly tolerated by older patients, and bed rest can lead to further demineralization of the vertebrae, predisposing to future fractures. Percutaneous minimally invasive vertebral augmentation methods for cement application into the vertebral body are a useful tool for the management of symptomatic fractures without neurological impairment when conventional measures of treatment can not be adopted. Two different percutaneous minimally invasive vertebral augmentation methods for cement application into the vertebral body for the management of symptomatic vertebral body fractures without neurological impairment have been developed, namely vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty have gained wide acceptance worldwide to manage patients without neurological impairment suffering from unmanageable pain caused by vertebral body fractures. Both procedures depend on mechanical stabilization of the fracture produced by cement injection into the fractured vertebral body. Cement augmentation of the vertebral body by vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty was originally introduced for osteoporotic compression fractures, but surgeons have now applied these techniques as a method of enhancing anterior column support while avoiding the morbidity and complications associated with anterior approaches. The mainstay of the controversy between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are height restoration, whether or not this height restoration is clinically significant, and the risks related to height restoration.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT03682328
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other Assiut University trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07423312 — Lead Exposure and Multiple Sclerosis · not yet recruiting
- NCT07234526 — Usage of Glucose Fluctuations as a Prognostic Marker in Septic Shock Patients · not yet recruiting
- NCT07273214 — Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Third Trimester Pregnant Mothers Towards Self-Medication in Assiut, Egypt · not yet recruiting
- NCT07194863 — Efficacy of Essential Phospholipid Versus Betaine HCL/L-Glutamic Acid in MAFLD · not yet recruiting
- NCT07053709 — Screening for Hyperuricemia in Patients With Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) · not yet recruiting
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03682328 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Assiut University
- Last refreshed: 24 September 2018
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03682328.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing