18 and older, any sex, with Emphysema. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Count of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events.Primary· 18 months
Adverse events will be based upon National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
3
Change From Baseline Value in Forced Expiratory Volume Percent PredictedSecondary· Baseline and months 6, 12, and 18
Forced Expiratory Volume will be taken both prior (baseline) and following the procedure (months 6, 12, and 18)
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
28.5
19.0 – 42.0
Change at 6 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
5.0
-3.0 – 18.0
Change at 12 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
3.0
3.0 – 10.0
Change at 18 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
5.5
-2.0 – 6.0
Change From Baseline Value in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Liters)Secondary· Baseline and months 6, 12, and 18
Forced Expiratory Volume will be taken both prior (baseline) and following the procedure (months 6, 12, and 18)
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
0.79
0.53 – 1.29
Change at 6 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
0.13
-0.08 – 0.50
Change at 12 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
0.14
-0.03 – 0.25
Change at 18 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
0.02
-0.06 – 0.15
Change From Baseline in Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Dioxide (% Predicted)Secondary· Baseline and months 6, 12, and 18
Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Dioxide will be taken both prior (baseline) and following the procedure (months 6, 12, and 18)
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
40.0
24.0 – 67.0
Change at 6 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
-8.0
-20.0 – 11.0
Change at 12 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
-10.0
-14.0 – 9.0
Change at 18 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
-3.5
-22.0 – 11.0
Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test (Meters)Secondary· Baseline and month 6
The walk test will be done both prior (baseline) and following the procedure (month 6)
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
289.0
48.0 – 430.0
6 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
406.0
79.0 – 629.0
Change at 6 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
27.0
11.0 – 301.0
Total Lung Capacity (% of Predicted Value)Secondary· Baseline and date of last available time-point in follow-up period (up to 18 months)
Total Lung Capacity will be measured both prior (baseline) and following the procedure (up to 18 months)
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
127.5
117 – 146
Last available time-point in follow-up period
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
119.5
104 – 147
Residual Volume (RV) (% of Predicted Value)Secondary· Baseline and date of last available time-point in follow-up period (up to 18 months)
Residual volume (RV) is the volume of air remaining in the lungs after maximum forceful expiration. In other words, it is the volume of air that cannot be expelled from the lungs, thus causing the alveoli to remain open at all times.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
191
104 – 255
Last available time-point in follow-up period
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
188
104 – 238
Short Form (SF)-36 Quality of Life Survey ScoreSecondary· Baseline and months 6
The SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) assesses limitations in physical functioning due to health problems, limitations in usual role because of physical health problems, bodily pain, and general health perceptions; the mental component summary (MCS) assesses vitality, limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems, limitations in usual role due to emotional problems, and general mental health. The PCS and MCS scores each range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Increases from baseline indicate improvement.
PCS-Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
31.9
24.1 – 43.8
PCS-6 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
24.9
21.1 – 48.6
MCS-baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
48.0
21.0 – 58.3
MCS-6 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
51.5
34.6 – 57.9
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: 18 months.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Since medical therapies offer only modest palliation and minimal hopes for improved survival to COPD patients, surgical therapies have been designed that may provide greater benefits in selected patients. Lung transplantation, for example, clearly improves survival and quality of life in patients with end stage COPD. This comes at substantial economic cost, however, as well as the at the cost of complications that may result from the complex surgery and from life-long immunosuppression. In addition, nearly all lung transplants will fail within 5 years as a result of progressive bronchiolitis obliterans, which we currently have no way to prevent or treat.
A second operation designed to treat severe COPD patients is lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). This operation, designed for patients with predominant emphysema rather than chronic bronchitis, is among the most carefully studied operations ever developed.
We believe that by reducing the volume of emphysematous lung with the precise target localization made possible by image-guided SABR, that we will be able to duplicate the benefits of surgical lung volume reduction with far less risk. We believe that this may represent a major advance in the therapy of emphysema - a highly prevalent disease. It may provide not only palliation but also increased survival, as does surgical lung volume reduction, in carefully selected patients.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Other trials of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)
Trials testing the same drug.
NCT06585878 — A Prospective Registry Study of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) for Oligometastatic/Oligometastatic Renal Cell
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT04948034 — The Combination of Fruquintinib, Tislelizumab and Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer(RIF
· Phase 2
· unknown
NCT03486431 — A Dose-escalation Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Non-spine Bone & Lymph Node Oligometastates
· NA
· completed
NCT03349892 — Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia
· NA
· completed
NCT02629458 — A Study to Determine the Feasibility and Acceptability of Conducting a Phase III Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing S
· NA
· completed
Other recruiting trials for Emphysema
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07059637 — Implementation of a Sarcopenia Clinic to Diagnose and Treat Skeletal Muscle Loss Due to COPD
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06891755 — Bronchoscopic RElease of Air Trapped in Hyperinflated Emphysematous Lung - Study 3
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06025500 — Analysing Peripheral Skeletal Muscle Function Before and After Endobronchial Valve Treatment
· recruiting
NCT06533371 — Clinical-ultrasonographic Assessment of Pulmonary Emphysema
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06528418 — Identification of Multiple Pulmonary Diseases Using Volatile Organic Compounds Biomarkers in Human Exhaled Breath
· recruiting
Other Stanford University trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT05945147 — Ketamine and Midazolam Infusions for CRPS: Feasibility Study
· Phase 2
· withdrawn
NCT04225949 — Patients Understanding of PROM Graphs
· NA
· withdrawn
NCT06273098 — School-Based Bladder Health Intervention
· NA
· withdrawn
NCT04652635 — Management of Nailbed Injuries
· NA
· withdrawn
NCT05443503 — Stanford Spine Keeper - Managing Your Low Back Pain
· NA
· suspended
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Stanford University
Last refreshed: 11 July 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03673176.