Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03653026: U-Accomplish

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib (ABT-494) in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Completed Phase 3 Results posted Last updated 2 March 2022
What this trial tests

Phase 3 trial testing Placebo in Ulcerative Colitis (UC) in 522 participants. Completed in 14 January 2021.

Timeline
6 December 2018
Primary endpoint
14 January 2021
14 January 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorAbbVie
PhasePhase 3
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingquadruple
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment522
Start date6 December 2018
Primary completion14 January 2021
Estimated completion14 January 2021
Sites379 locations across Italy, Colombia, Finland, Japan, Malaysia, Taiwan, Ireland, Poland

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

AbbVie — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 16 to 75, any sex, with Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission Per Adapted Mayo Score at Week 8 Primary · Week 8

The Adapted Mayo Score is a composite score of UC disease activity based on the following 3 subscores: 1. Stool frequency subscore (SFS), scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools more than normal). 2. Rectal bleeding subscore (RBS), scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). 3. Endoscopic subscore, scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). The overall Adapted Mayo score ranges from 0 to 9 where higher scores represent more severe disease. Clinical remission is defined as an Adapted Mayo score ≤ 2,

GroupValue95% CI
Upadacitinib 45 mg33.528.5 – 38.5
Placebo4.11.1 – 7.1
Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 8 Secondary · Week 8

Endoscopic improvement is defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopies were assessed by a blinded central reader and scored according to the following scale: 0 = Normal or inactive disease; 1 = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern); 2 = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, any friability, erosions); 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).

GroupValue95% CI
Upadacitinib 45 mg44.038.8 – 49.3
Placebo8.34.1 – 12.5
Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 8 Secondary · Week 8

Endoscopic remission is defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0. Endoscopies were assessed by a blinded central reader and scored according to the following scale: 0 = Normal or inactive disease; 1 = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern); 2 = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, any friability, erosions); 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).

GroupValue95% CI
Upadacitinib 45 mg18.214.1 – 22.3
Placebo1.70.0 – 3.7
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response Per Adapted Mayo Score at Week 8 Secondary · Week 8

The Adapted Mayo Score is a composite score of UC disease activity based on the following 3 subscores: 1. Stool frequency subscore (SFS), scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools more than normal). 2. Rectal bleeding subscore (RBS), scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). 3. Endoscopic subscore, scored from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease with spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). The overall Adapted Mayo score ranges from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing more severe disease. Clinical response per the Adapted Mayo Score is define

GroupValue95% CI
Upadacitinib 45 mg74.569.9 – 79.1
Placebo25.418.9 – 31.8
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response Per Partial Adapted Mayo Score at Week 2 Secondary · Week 2

The Partial Adapted Mayo Score is a composite score of UC disease activity based on the following 2 subscores: 1. Stool frequency subscore (SFS), scored from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools more than normal). 2. Rectal bleeding subscore (RBS), scored from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). The overall Partial Adapted Mayo score ranges from 0 to 6 with higher scores representing more severe disease. Clinical response per Partial Adapted Mayo Score is defined as a decrease in Partial Adapted Mayo score ≥ 1 point and ≥ 30% from Baseline, plus a decrease in RBS ≥ 1

GroupValue95% CI
Upadacitinib 45 mg63.358.2 – 68.5
Placebo25.919.4 – 32.4
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement at Week 8 Secondary · Week 8

Histologic endoscopic mucosal improvement is defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 and a Geboes score ≤ 3.1. The endoscopic subscore ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease with spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). The Geboes histologic index includes seven histological features (architectural change, chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils, neutrophils in epithelium, crypt destruction and erosion or ulcers). The Geboes score has 6 grades, each with 3-5 subgrades: Grade 0, structural change only; Grade 1, chronic inflammation; G

GroupValue95% CI
Upadacitinib 45 mg36.731.6 – 41.8
Placebo5.92.3 – 9.4
Percentage of Participants Who Reported No Bowel Urgency at Week 8 Secondary · Week 8

Bowel urgency was assessed by participants in a subject diary completed once a day.

GroupValue95% CI
Upadacitinib 45 mg53.748.4 – 59.0
Placebo25.919.4 – 32.4
Percentage of Participants Who Reported No Abdominal Pain at Week 8 Secondary · Week 8

Abdominal pain was assessed by participants in a subject diary completed once a day.

GroupValue95% CI
Upadacitinib 45 mg53.748.4 – 59.0
Placebo24.117.8 – 30.5
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Histologic Improvement at Week 8 Secondary · Week 8

Histologic improvement is defined as a decrease from Baseline in Geboes score. The Geboes histologic index includes seven histological features (architectural change, chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils, neutrophils in epithelium, crypt destruction and erosion or ulcers). The Geboes score has 6 grades, each with 3-5 subgrades: Grade 0, structural change only; Grade 1, chronic inflammation; Grade 2, lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; Grade 3, neutrophils in epithelium; Grade 4, crypt destruction; and Grade 5, erosions or ulceration.

GroupValue95% CI
Upadacitinib 45 mg62.257.0 – 67.3
Placebo24.518.0 – 30.9
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score at Week 8 Secondary · Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8

The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) is used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with ulcerative colitis. It consists of 32 questions evaluating bowel and systemic symptoms, as well as emotional and social functions. Each question is answered on a scale from 1 (worst) to 7 (best). The total score ranges from 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

GroupValue95% CI
Upadacitinib 45 mg52.248.57 – 55.92
Placebo21.115.98 – 26.17
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Mucosal Healing at Week 8 Secondary · Week 8

Mucosal healing is defined as an endoscopic score of 0 and Geboes score \< 2.0. The endoscopic subscore ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease with spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). The Geboes histologic index includes seven histological features (architectural change, chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils, neutrophils in epithelium, crypt destruction and erosion or ulcers). The Geboes score has 6 grades, each with 3-5 subgrades: Grade 0, structural change only; Grade 1, chronic inflammation; Grade 2, lamina propria neutrophils a

GroupValue95% CI
Upadacitinib 45 mg13.59.9 – 17.1
Placebo1.70.0 – 3.7
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 8 Secondary · Baseline (Week 0) to Week 8

The FACIT fatigue questionnaire was developed to assess fatigue associated with anemia. It consists of 13 fatigue-related questions. Each question is answered on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 (not at all); 1 (a little bit); 2 (somewhat); 3 (quite a bit); and 4 (very much). The total score ranges from 0 to 52, where higher scores represent less fatigue, and a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

GroupValue95% CI
Upadacitinib 45 mg9.48.38 – 10.48
Placebo3.52.02 – 4.92

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Part 1: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 12 weeks) or until first dose of study drug in Part 2 or first dose of study drug in M14-234 (NCT02819635; maintenance study) or M14-533 (NCT03006068; long term extension). Part 2: From the first dose of study drug in Part 2 up to 30 days after last dose (up to 12 weeks) or until first dose of study drug in M14-234 (maintenance study) or the first dose date of study drug in M14-533 (long-term extension study).. Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Part 1: Upadacitinib 45 mg
Serious: 11/344 (3%)
Deaths: 0/344
Part 1: Placebo
Serious: 8/177 (5%)
Deaths: 0/177
Part 2: Upadacitinib 45 mg / Upadacitinib 45 mg
Serious: 1/68 (1%)
Deaths: 0/68
Part 2: Placebo / Upadacitinib 45 mg
Serious: 4/116 (3%)
Deaths: 0/116

Serious adverse events (19 terms)

ReactionSystemPart 1: Upadacitinib 45 mgPart 1: PlaceboPart 2: Upadacitinib 45 mg…Part 2: Placebo / Upadacit…
COLITIS ULCERATIVEGastrointestinal disorders
ANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disorders
ABDOMINAL DISCOMFORTGastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN LOWERGastrointestinal disorders
COLITISGastrointestinal disorders
LARGE INTESTINE PERFORATIONGastrointestinal disorders
CHEST PAINGeneral disorders
COVID-19 PNEUMONIAInfections and infestations
DENGUE FEVERInfections and infestations
ENTEROCOCCAL INFECTIONInfections and infestations
ESCHERICHIA INFECTIONInfections and infestations
GASTROINTESTINAL STOMA NECROSISInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
HAND FRACTUREInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
MALNUTRITIONMetabolism and nutrition disorders
ACUTE PSYCHOSISPsychiatric disorders
CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASERespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PULMONARY EMBOLISMRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PYODERMA GANGRENOSUMSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
PELVIC VENOUS THROMBOSISVascular disorders
Other adverse events (5 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemPart 1: Upadacitinib 45 mgPart 1: PlaceboPart 2: Upadacitinib 45 mg…Part 2: Placebo / Upadacit…
ACNESkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
HEADACHENervous system disorders
BLOOD CREATINE PHOSPHOKINASE INCREASEDInvestigations
ANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disorders
PYREXIAGeneral disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: COLITIS ULCERATIVE, ANAEMIA, ABDOMINAL DISCOMFORT, ABDOMINAL PAIN LOWER, COLITIS, LARGE INTESTINE PERFORATION, CHEST PAIN, COVID-19 PNEUMONIA.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03653026 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib compared to placebo in inducing clinical remission (per Adapted Mayo score) in participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).

Publications & conference data

8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Upadacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results from three phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised trials.
    Danese S, Vermeire S, Zhou W, Pangan AL, et al · · 2022 · cited 443× · PMID 35644166 · DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00581-5
  2. Janus kinase-targeting therapies in rheumatology: a mechanisms-based approach.
    Tanaka Y, Luo Y, O'Shea JJ, Nakayamada S. · · 2022 · cited 329× · PMID 34987201 · DOI 10.1038/s41584-021-00726-8
  3. JAK/STAT pathway: Extracellular signals, diseases, immunity, and therapeutic regimens.
    Hu Q, Bian Q, Rong D, Wang L, et al · · 2023 · cited 190× · PMID 36911202 · DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1110765
  4. Novel and Emerging Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
    Al-Bawardy B, Shivashankar R, Proctor DD. · · 2021 · cited 117× · PMID 33935763 · DOI 10.3389/fphar.2021.651415
  5. Targeted Immunotherapy for Autoimmune Disease.
    Jung SM, Kim WU. · · 2022 · cited 113× · PMID 35291650 · DOI 10.4110/in.2022.22.e9
  6. Perspectives on Current and Novel Treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
    Na SY, Moon W. · · 2019 · cited 99× · PMID 31195433 · DOI 10.5009/gnl19019
  7. JAK-STAT signaling in human disease: From genetic syndromes to clinical inhibition.
    Luo Y, Alexander M, Gadina M, O'Shea JJ, et al · · 2021 · cited 92× · PMID 34625141 · DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.004
  8. Upadacitinib: Mechanism of action, clinical, and translational science.
    Mohamed MF, Bhatnagar S, Parmentier JM, Nakasato P, et al · · 2024 · cited 85× · PMID 37984057 · DOI 10.1111/cts.13688

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Upadacitinib

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other AbbVie trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03653026.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing