Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03613142

Comparison Between Double Tract Anastomosis and Esophagogastrostomy After Radical Proximal Gastrectomy

Status unknown NA Last updated 8 November 2018
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Double tract anatomosis in Gastric Cancer in 202 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 January 2019
Primary endpoint
30 December 2021
30 December 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorPeking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designsequential
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment202
Start date1 January 2019
Primary completion30 December 2021
Estimated completion30 December 2021

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

Who can join

Adults 18 to 80, any sex, with Gastric Cancer or GastroEsophageal Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The patients with upper gastric cancer (cT1N0M0) or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (diameter less than 4 cm) will be enrolled into this study. Each of these patients will undergo radical proximal gastrectomy and be randomly allocated into one of the two groups, double tract anastomosis group or esophagogastrostomy group. The following data will be collected to compare the difference between the two reconstruction methods: the rate of reflux esophagitis, postoperative quality of life, economic expenditure, the safety of operation, postoperative recovery, postoperative nutrition status and oncological effect. Through the comprehensive analysis, the result of this study will elucidate the best of the reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy.

Publications & conference data

2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Double-tract reconstruction is superior to esophagogastrostomy in controlling reflux esophagitis and enhancing quality of life after proximal gastrectomy: Results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial in China.
    Zhang Y, Zhang H, Yan Y, Ji K, et al · · 2023 · cited 5× · PMID 38204447 · DOI 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.06.09
  2. Double-tract reconstruction is superior in controlling reflux esophagitis and enhancing quality of life after proximal gastrectomy: Results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial in China
    Zhang Y, Ji X, Yan Y, Ji K, et al · · 2022 · DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1960657/v2

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Gastric Cancer

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03613142.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing