Adults 22 to 65, any sex, with Improvement of Jawline Contour. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Responder Rate According to the Merz Jawline Assessment Scale (MJAS)Primary· At Week 12
MJAS was a 5-point scale (0-4 scores; higher scores mean worse outcome). Responder rate was defined as percentage of participants with a greater than or equal to (\>=) 1-point improvement.
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment With Radiesse (+)
75.6
67.3 – 82.3
Control/Delayed Treatment With Radiesse (+)
8.8
3.8 – 18.9
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Device and/or Injection Related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Device and/or Injection Related Serious TEAEsPrimary· Baseline up to end of study (Week 60)
Participants with Device and/or Injection Related TEAEs
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment With Radiesse (+)
36
Control/Delayed Treatment With Radiesse (+)
10
Participants with Device and/or Injection Related Serious TEAEs
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment With Radiesse (+)
0
Control/Delayed Treatment With Radiesse (+)
0
Percent Change From Baseline in Face-Q SatisfactionSecondary· Baseline up to Week 12
The participant assessed satisfaction using the Face-Q Satisfaction with Lower Face and Jawline module (Rasch transformed score 0-100; higher scores mean better outcome).
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment With Radiesse (+)
269.8
215.1 – 324.6
Control/Delayed Treatment With Radiesse (+)
-9.4
-28.2 – 9.5
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Scores as Assessed by the Treating InvestigatorSecondary· At Week 12
GAIS ratings (-3 to +3 scores; lower scores mean worse outcome).
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment With Radiesse (+)
37
Treatment With Radiesse (+)
51
Treatment With Radiesse (+)
27
Treatment With Radiesse (+)
1
GAIS Scores as Assessed by ParticipantsSecondary· At Week 12
GAIS ratings (-3 to +3 scores; lower scores mean worse outcome).
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment With Radiesse (+)
32
Treatment With Radiesse (+)
38
Treatment With Radiesse (+)
39
Treatment With Radiesse (+)
6
Responder Rate According to the MJAS as Assessed by Independent Panel Reviewers (IPRs)Secondary· At Week 12
MJAS was a 5-point scale (0-4 scores; higher scores mean worse outcome). Responder rate was defined as percentage of participants with a \>=1-point improvement.
Group
Value
95% CI
Treatment With Radiesse (+)
47.7
38.7 – 57.0
Control/Delayed Treatment With Radiesse (+)
8.2
3.2 – 19.2
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: From first treatment up to the end of study (Week 60).
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
To demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of Radiesse (+) following deep (subdermal and/or supraperiosteal) injection to improve the contour of jawline by adding volume to the jawline.
Publications & conference data
2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT06093815 — Prospective Study to Assess Tissue Responses After Injection With Biostimulatory Products
· NA
· completed
NCT05222607 — Longitudinal Evaluation and Real-world Evidence of NT201
· terminated
NCT05784363 — A Study of NT 201 in the Treatment of Enlarged Pores and Excessive Sebum Production in the Face
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT05163353 — Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Diluted RADIESSE® in the Treatment of Décolleté Wrinkles
· NA
· completed
NCT04886232 — A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparator-controlled, Evaluator-blinded Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effect
· NA
· completed
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Merz North America, Inc.
Last refreshed: 14 November 2023
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03583359.