Adults 10 to 120, any sex, with Arteriovenous Malformations. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Target Volume Difference Between Standard of Care vs. CT Angiogram and MRI AlonePrimary· Same day measurements
The primary endpoint of this study is to compare the volumes of targets generated from interventional cerebral arteriography (reference) to targets generated from CT angiogram and MRI alone, to assess whether noninvasive imaging approaches are noninferior to the UTSW standard
Group
Value
95% CI
CT Angiogram in Addition to Standard of Care
1.1
± 2.5
Standard of Care
1.3
± 2.4
CT Angiogram Additional TimeSecondary· Same day
Additional time required for CT angiogram after standard of care imaging
Group
Value
95% CI
Additional Time Required for CT Angiogram
8
± 4.3
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: 1 month.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Evaluate whether a treatment plan based on CT angiography can accurately and precisely identify the target nidus as compared to standard cerebral arteriography fused to MRI.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Last refreshed: 15 October 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03559556.