Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03551509

LifeNet: Extracellular Matrix Graft in Rotator Cuff Repair

Terminated Phase 4 Results posted Last updated 19 June 2025
What this trial tests

Phase 4 trial testing ArthroFLEX ECM scaffold graft in Rotator Cuff Tear in 9 participants. Terminated before completion.

Timeline
1 July 2018
Primary endpoint
30 June 2024
30 June 2024

Quick facts

Lead sponsorGregory Gilot
PhasePhase 4
StatusTerminated
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment9
Start date1 July 2018
Primary completion30 June 2024
Estimated completion30 June 2024
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Gregory Gilot — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Rotator Cuff Tear. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Tendon Healing Primary · As assessed 1 year postoperatively.

Success as defined by tendon healing after rotator cuff repair, as indicated based on MRI

GroupValue95% CI
Control Treatment Group0
Treatment Group3
Alternative Treatment Group1
Comparison of Healing by MRI vs US Primary · As assessed 1 year postoperatively.

Comparison of tendon healing will be assessed using US imaging modalities versus MRI (Success as defined by tendon healing after rotator cuff repair, as indicated based on US)

GroupValue95% CI
Control Treatment Group0
Treatment Group3
Alternative Treatment Group1
Progress of Tendon Healing Primary · As assessed at 6 weeks postoperatively.

Progress of tendon healing based on US will be used as predictive data for 1 year success (based on primary outcome) (Success as defined by tendon healing after rotator cuff repair, as indicated based on US)

GroupValue95% CI
Control Treatment Group3
Treatment Group3
Alternative Treatment Group1
Progress of Tendon Healing Primary · As assessed at 3 months postoperatively.

Progress of tendon healing based on US will be used as predictive data for 1 year success (based on primary outcome) (Success as defined by tendon healing after rotator cuff repair, as indicated based on US)

GroupValue95% CI
Control Treatment Group1
Treatment Group3
Alternative Treatment Group1
Progress of Tendon Healing Primary · As assessed at 6 months postoperatively.

Progress of tendon healing based on US will be used as predictive data for 1 year success (based on primary outcome) (Success as defined by tendon healing after rotator cuff repair, as indicated based on US)

GroupValue95% CI
Control Treatment Group3
Treatment Group3
Alternative Treatment Group1
Progress of Tendon Healing Primary · As assessed at 9 months postoperatively.

Progress of tendon healing based on US will be used as predictive data for 1 year success (based on primary outcome) (Success as defined by tendon healing after rotator cuff repair, as indicated based on US)

GroupValue95% CI
Control Treatment Group0
Treatment Group3
Alternative Treatment Group1
Patient Outcomes: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Shoulder Score (ASES) Secondary · Preoperative

The ASES is standardized form for assessment of the shoulder. The patient self-evaluation section form contains visual analog scales for pain and activities of daily living questionnaire. The activities of daily living questionnaire is marked on a four-point ordinal scale that can be converted to a cumulative activities of daily living index. A shoulder score can be derived from the visual analogue scale score for pain (50%) and the cumulative activities of daily living score (50%). Scores range from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the outcome.

GroupValue95% CI
Control Treatment Group50.75± 20.15
Treatment Group37.66± 15.69
Alternative Treatment Group52.00
Patient Outcomes: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Shoulder Score (ASES) Secondary · 6 weeks after surgery

The ASES is standardized form for assessment of the shoulder. The patient self-evaluation section form contains visual analog scales for pain and activities of daily living questionnaire. The activities of daily living questionnaire is marked on a four-point ordinal scale that can be converted to a cumulative activities of daily living index. A shoulder score can be derived from the visual analogue scale score for pain (50%) and the cumulative activities of daily living score (50%). Scores range from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the outcome.

GroupValue95% CI
Control Treatment Group58.25± 20.20
Treatment Group58.66± 21.00
Alternative Treatment Group45.00
Patient Outcomes: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Shoulder Score (ASES) Secondary · 3 months after surgery

The ASES is standardized form for assessment of the shoulder. The patient self-evaluation section form contains visual analog scales for pain and activities of daily living questionnaire. The activities of daily living questionnaire is marked on a four-point ordinal scale that can be converted to a cumulative activities of daily living index. A shoulder score can be derived from the visual analogue scale score for pain (50%) and the cumulative activities of daily living score (50%). Scores range from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the outcome.

GroupValue95% CI
Control Treatment Group66.66± 21.38
Treatment Group74.00± 19.05
Patient Outcomes: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Shoulder Score (ASES) Secondary · 6 months after surgery

The ASES is standardized form for assessment of the shoulder. The patient self-evaluation section form contains visual analog scales for pain and activities of daily living questionnaire. The activities of daily living questionnaire is marked on a four-point ordinal scale that can be converted to a cumulative activities of daily living index. A shoulder score can be derived from the visual analogue scale score for pain (50%) and the cumulative activities of daily living score (50%). Scores range from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the outcome.

GroupValue95% CI
Control Treatment Group73.00± 26.51
Treatment Group77.00± 16.52
Patient Outcomes: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Shoulder Score (ASES) Secondary · 9 months after surgery

The ASES is standardized form for assessment of the shoulder. The patient self-evaluation section form contains visual analog scales for pain and activities of daily living questionnaire. The activities of daily living questionnaire is marked on a four-point ordinal scale that can be converted to a cumulative activities of daily living index. A shoulder score can be derived from the visual analogue scale score for pain (50%) and the cumulative activities of daily living score (50%). Scores range from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the outcome.

GroupValue95% CI
Control Treatment Group82.75± 21.96
Treatment Group77.66± 7.50
Alternative Treatment Group60.00
Patient Outcomes: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Shoulder Score (ASES) Secondary · 1 year after surgery

The ASES is standardized form for assessment of the shoulder. The patient self-evaluation section form contains visual analog scales for pain and activities of daily living questionnaire. The activities of daily living questionnaire is marked on a four-point ordinal scale that can be converted to a cumulative activities of daily living index. A shoulder score can be derived from the visual analogue scale score for pain (50%) and the cumulative activities of daily living score (50%). Scores range from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the outcome.

GroupValue95% CI
Control Treatment Group85.00± 15.03
Treatment Group88.00± 6.55
Alternative Treatment Group55.00

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Within 1 year after surgery. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Control Treatment Group
Serious: 0/4 (0%)
Deaths: 0/4
Treatment Group
Serious: 0/3 (0%)
Deaths: 0/3
Alternative Treatment Group
Serious: 0/1 (0%)
Deaths: 0/1
Other adverse events (11 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemControl Treatment GroupTreatment GroupAlternative Treatment Group
Dry eyesEye disorders
Posterior vitrous detachmentEye disorders
Pain from shoulder to handMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
DizzinessNervous system disorders
Low back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Atypical chest painCardiac disorders
Back muscle spasmMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Foot painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hip contusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Shoulder tear (contralateral)Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Covid-19 positiveInfections and infestations

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03551509 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the ArthroFLEX® ECM scaffold graph as an augment in rotator cuff repair surgery to reduce the failure rate of rotator cuff repairs for large and massive rotator cuff tears.

Publications & conference data

2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Hydrogels in the clinic: An update.
    Clegg JR, Adebowale K, Zhao Z, Mitragotri S. · · 2024 · cited 64× · PMID 39545079 · DOI 10.1002/btm2.10680
  2. Implementation of Endogenous and Exogenous Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells for Skeletal Tissue Regeneration and Repair.
    Desai S, Jayasuriya CT. · · 2020 · cited 8× · PMID 32759659 · DOI 10.3390/bioengineering7030086

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Rotator Cuff Tear

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03551509.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing