Adults 12 to 17, any sex, with Fabry Disease. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number Of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Primary· Day 1 (after dosing) through Month 12 and follow-up (30 days after last dose)
TEAEs included adverse events that began on or after the first dose of study drug until 30 days after the last dose. Treatment-related TEAEs were defined as TEAEs that had an investigator-defined relationship to study drug of "Definite," "Probable," or "Possible." A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
5
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over The Dosing Interval (AUCtau) Of MigalastatPrimary· 0 to 12 hours postdose during the first month of study and trough samples at Months 6 and 12
PK sampling was performed on 1 occasion at steady-state during the first month of the study. Adolescent participants were randomized to 3 sparse PK sampling groups based on optimal sampling theory. Each blood sample could have been taken at any time within the following time point ranges. Time point ranges for all 3 sparse sampling groups are arranged here in chronological order: 1 to 1.25 hours (h), 1.5 to 2h, 2.75 to 3.25h, 3.25 to 3.75h, 3.75 to 4.25h, 5 to 5.5h, 5.25 to 5.75h, 6.5 to 7h, 8.25 to 8.75h, 8.75 to 9.25h, and 10.75 to 11.25h post-dose. The combined sampling scheme resulted in r
12 to <16 years old
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
8920
± 47.2
16 to <18 years old
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
8430
± 41.7
12 to <18 years old
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
8740
± 44.2
PK: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Of MigalastatPrimary· 0 to 12 hours postdose during the first month of study and trough samples at Months 6 and 12
PK sampling was performed on 1 occasion at steady-state during the first month of the study. Adolescent participants were randomized to 3 sparse PK sampling groups based on optimal sampling theory. Each blood sample could have been taken at any time within the following time point ranges. Time point ranges for all 3 sparse sampling groups are arranged here in chronological order: 1 to 1.25h, 1.5 to 2h, 2.75 to 3.25h, 3.25 to 3.75h, 3.75 to 4.25h, 5 to 5.5h, 5.25 to 5.75h, 6.5 to 7h, 8.25 to 8.75h, 8.75 to 9.25h, and 10.75 to 11.25h post-dose. The combined sampling scheme resulted in rich data
12 to <16 years old
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
1220
± 60.9
16 to <18 years old
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
1160
± 39.2
12 to <18 years old
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
1200
± 52.7
Change In eGFR From Baseline To Month 12Secondary· Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)
eGFR was calculated using the modified Schwartz formula for creatinine clearance.
Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
-1.6
± 15.40
Last observation (up to Month 12)
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
-1.6
± 14.99
Annualized Rate Of Change From BaselineSecondary· Baseline up to Month 12
Annualized rate of change from baseline of eGFR was defined as change from baseline to last visit divided by the duration from baseline to the last visit (Last assessment date - First dose date +1) and multiplied by 365.25. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to the first dose of study drug.
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
-1.5
± 15.11
Change From Baseline In Total Urine Protein And Urine Albumin Levels At Month 12Secondary· Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)
Renal function was assessed by urine protein and urine albumin levels. Urine samples were collected as part of urinalysis to measure protein and albumin levels.
Total Urine Protein: Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
36.0
± 111.61
Total Urine Protein: Last observation (up to Month 12)
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
36.2
± 108.64
Urine Albumin: Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
16.2
± 28.27
Urine Albumin: Last observation (up to Month 12)
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
15.6
± 27.67
Change From Baseline In Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMi)Secondary· Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)
LVMi was assessed as a measure of cardiac impairment in the study participants. LVMi values for both M Mode and 2D views are presented.
M Mode: Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
-3.9
± 13.53
2D: Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
4.9
± 9.12
M Mode: Last observation (up to Month 12)
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
-4.4
± 13.31
2D: Last observation (up to Month 12)
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
4.3
± 9.34
Change In Plasma Levels Of Globotriaosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb3)Secondary· Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)
Blood samples were collected for measurement of lyso-Gb3 levels in plasma. Plasma levels of lyso-Gb3 were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay.
Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg: ERT Naive
-14.0
± 23.13
Migalastat HCl 150 mg: ERT Experienced
12.5
± 36.33
Last Observation (up to Month 12)
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg: ERT Naive
-14.0
± 23.13
Migalastat HCl 150 mg: ERT Experienced
11.3
± 34.67
FABPRO-GI And Pain ScoresSecondary· Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)
The Fabry Disease Patient-Reported Outcome - Gastrointestinal Signs And Symptoms (FABPRO-GI) And Pain Questionnaire For Clinical Trials (24-hr Version) consists of questions regarding gastrointestinal signs and symptoms and pain relative to the past 24 hours. Participants rated the severity of their symptoms and pain from 0 (none) to 10 (worst possible). The monthly average score at Month 12 and at last observation are presented. A higher score indicated higher levels of symptoms and pain.
Daily Ratings of Severity in Constipation: Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
0.9
± 1.91
Daily Ratings of Severity in Constipation: Last observation (up to Month 12)
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
0.4
± 1.00
Daily Ratings of Severity in Diarrhea: Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
1.0
± 1.65
Daily Ratings of Severity in Diarrhea: Last Observation (up to Month 12)
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
0.4
± 0.91
Overall Pain: Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
0.6
± 0.71
Overall Pain: Last Observation (up to Month 12)
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
1.2
± 1.50
Worst Tummy Pain: Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
0.3
± 0.38
Worst Tummy Pain: Last Observation (up to Month 12)
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
0.9
± 1.52
Patient's Global Impression Of Change (PGI-C) ScoresSecondary· Month 12
The PGI-C consists of 4 questions regarding diarrhea, abdominal pain, overall pain, and daily living. Participants rated their status based on improvement, worsening, or the same. Improved status includes "Much better", "Better" and "A little better"; worsened status includes "A little worse", "Worse" and "Much worse".
Diarrhea: Status Improved
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
12
Diarrhea: Status Same
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
7
Diarrhea: Status Worse
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
0
Abdominal pain: Status Improved
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
10
Abdominal pain: Status Same
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
8
Abdominal pain: Status Worse
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
1
Overall pain: Status Improved
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
10
Overall pain: Status Same
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
8
Number Of Participants Who Experienced Sudden Onset Of Pain As Assessed Using The Fabry-Specific Pediatric Health And Pain Questionnaire (FPHPQ)Secondary· Month 12
The assessment of "In the last 3 months how many times did you experience sudden onset of pain?" using the FPHPQ for ages 13 to 18 is presented.
0 times
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
4
1-3 times
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
5
4-6 times
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
4
> 6 times
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
3
Change From Baseline In FPHPQ Score For Pain IntensitySecondary· Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)
The assessment of "How bad is your pain today?" using the FPHPQ for ages 13 to 18 is presented. Pain intensity was measured on a 10-point scale, 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). A decrease from baseline indicates an improvement in the condition.
Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
0.4
± 1.82
Last observation (up to Month 12)
Group
Value
95% CI
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
0.4
± 1.77
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Day 1 (after dosing) through Month 12 and follow-up (30 days after last dose).
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
This was an open-label study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy of migalastat treatment in pediatric participants 12 to \<18 years of age with Fabry disease and amenable gene encoding α-galactosidase A (GLA) variants.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07187440 — A Study of Agalsidase Alfa Enyzme Replacement Therapy in Chinese Children and Adults With Fabry Disease
· recruiting
NCT06776419 — the Role of cArdiac Inflammation, endoThelial Dysfunction, and FIbrosis in fabrY Disease
· recruiting
NCT06539624 — Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of EXG110 in Subjects With Fabry Disease
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07277361 — Study of the Quality of Life of Patients With Fabry Disease Aged 65 and Over With and Without Specific Treatment
· recruiting
NCT06270316 — Safety, PK/PD, and Exploratory Efficacy Study of AMT-191 in Classic Fabry Disease
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
Other Amicus Therapeutics trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06121011 — A Global Prospective Observational Registry of Patients With Pompe Disease
· recruiting
NCT04804566 — Understanding Fabry Disease Therapy Choices Through the Eyes of the Patients
· completed
NCT04020055 — A Study to Evaluate Migalastat in Fabry Subjects With Amenable GLA Variant and Renal Disease
· Phase 3
· active not recruiting
NCT04281537 — A Study to Describe the Experience of Both Patients and Their Clinicians in the Treatment of Fabry Disease With Enzyme R
· completed
NCT04138277 — A Study to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of ATB200/AT2221 in Adult Subjects With Late-Onset Pompe Disease (LO
· Phase 3
· completed
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Amicus Therapeutics
Last refreshed: 30 November 2021
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03500094.