Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT03493399
Testing Interference-based Methods to Mitigate Gambling Craving - A Multiple Single Case Design
NA trial testing Interference in Gambling Disorder in 7 participants. Status unknown.
30 October 2019
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Université Catholique de Louvain |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Status unknown |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Design | sequential |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 7 |
| Start date | 1 July 2019 |
| Primary completion | 30 October 2019 |
| Estimated completion | 30 October 2019 |
| Sites | 1 location across Switzerland |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Interference
Conditions studied
- Gambling Disorder — all drugs for Gambling Disorder →
- Gambling, Pathological — all drugs for Gambling, Pathological →
- Craving — all drugs for Craving →
- Gambling — all drugs for Gambling →
Sponsor
Université Catholique de Louvain — full company profile →
Who can join
18 and older, any sex, with Gambling Disorder or Gambling, Pathological. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Gambling craving is involved in the development, maintenance and relapse of gambling disorder. Yet, it lacks research regarding evidence-based interventions available to mitigate craving in patients displaying gambling disorder. The elaborated intrusion theory of desire (EIT) is a cognitive model of craving which offers important avenues for the development of psychological interventions, as it clearly describes the processes at play in craving experiences (e.g., mental imageries, working memory). Recent research evidenced that the elaborated intrusion theory is relevant to account for gambling craving experiences. According to this model, craving (and desire) is the result of an elaboration process where "desires thoughts" (mental images and thoughts), induced by internal (e.g., frustration) and/or external (e.g., advertisement) triggers, require attentional and cognitive resources. The principle of interference-based techniques is to move the resources allocated to the elaboration of intrusive desire thoughts to a competing task (e.g., clay modelling, competitive mental imagery, Tetris) in order to monopolize the resources underlying craving, thus preventing its elaboration and reducing its vividness and overwhelming nature. Several studies have shown the efficacy of such techniques to reduce substance-related craving. Yet, data obtained on clinical samples remain scarce. Preliminary data have been obtained prior to this application. In order to investigate the relevance of interference-based techniques, an experimental study was conducted in community gamblers. In two conditions (19 gamblers per condition), gambling craving was first induced via a short mental imagery session and a computer-generated gambling simulation task. Then, the experimental group was asked to perform an interference task consisting of creating a vivid mental image of a bunch of keys. The control group completed a task in which they had to pop and count bubble wrap. The analyses revealed that induced craving decreases significantly in both groups. However, participants that are considered problem gamblers showed a greater decrease of their craving in the experimental condition. This previous "proof of principle" study supports that interference-based techniques are potentially promising interventions to reduce craving in problem gambling. It also warrants further research as no data is available in clinical population. The current project consists in a pilot study aiming to test the efficacy of interference-based techniques in a sample of gambling disorder patients. The investigators decided to adopt a multiple single case design, as this methodology is ideal in the sense that it helps to understand the whole process of an interference-based intervention among a small number (10) of outpatients with a gambling disorder, without control group. Ecological Momentary Assessment will be used to allow intervention no naturally occuring craving. In addition to be easily implementable in a clinical design, this design will provide sufficient evidences before possibly, in a second time, further validation of these techniques using a randomized-control trial.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT03493399
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Gambling Disorder
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT03669315 — Modulating Inhibitory Control Networks in Gambling Disorder With Theta Burst Stimulation · Phase 3 · recruiting
Other Université Catholique de Louvain trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07453524 — Assessing Chronic Pain Patient Preferences · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07422909 — Bridging the Gap: Implementing BRIDGES · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07420231 — Evaluation of the Synergistic Effect of Combining a Prebiotic and a Postbiotic on Intestinal Discomfort · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07360223 — Internalized Symptoms in Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Typically Developing Adolescents : Gaining · not yet recruiting
- NCT07263971 — Birth Experience of Women Giving Birth in Belgium · recruiting
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03493399 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Université Catholique de Louvain
- Last refreshed: 28 June 2019
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03493399.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing