Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03454399

Does Transesophageal Echocardiography Along With an Orogastric Tube Improve the Image Quality Intraoperatively?

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 23 September 2024
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Suction orogastric tube which is attached to TEE probe in TEE Image Quality in 47 participants. Completed in 31 December 2017.

Timeline
1 February 2017
Primary endpoint
31 December 2017
31 December 2017

Quick facts

Lead sponsorHenry Ford Health System
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationnon randomized
Designparallel
Maskingtriple
Primary purposediagnostic
Enrollment47
Start date1 February 2017
Primary completion31 December 2017
Estimated completion31 December 2017
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Henry Ford Health System — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with TEE Image Quality. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Image Quality Assessment Method#1: Difference in Likert Scale Before and After Suctioning Primary · TEE image sets were acquired after general anesthesia induction (before suction) and after 10minutes (after suction), and the outcome was the difference in image quality. In 6-8 months, investigator C did the same analysis on the same images in one day.

Difference in image quality assessment by Likert scale before/after suctioning, by assessing quality of images stored before/after suctioning. Investigators categorized the quality of all acquired images on a numeric scale (the higher number means higher image quality) based on each investigator's impression (1: very poor, 2: poor, 3: acceptable, 4: good, and 5: very good). Image quality improvement was determined by increased number. Three investigators (A, B, C) assessed the quality of all TEE image sets (i.e. before and after suctioning) post hoc. The acquired numeric scales were combined,

Improved after suction
GroupValue95% CI
TEE Image Before and After Suction79
Same after suction
GroupValue95% CI
TEE Image Before and After Suction62
Worse after suction
GroupValue95% CI
TEE Image Before and After Suction0
Reproducibility of the Left Ventricular Fraction Area Change (LV FAC) (Inter-observer) Secondary · Images are acquired after general anesthesia induction (before suctioning) and after 10min (after suctioning)

The reproducibility of the LV FAC was assessed, assuming that better image quality would yield better LV FAC reproducibility. Three investigators (A, B, and C) assessed the quality of tall TEE image sets (i.e. before and after suction) post oc. These image sets were combined, and assessment was done for each group (i.e. before and after suctioning)

intraclass correlation coefficients of LV FAC before suction
GroupValue95% CI
TEE Image Before and After Suction0.6590.511 – 0.78
intraclass correlation coefficients of LV FAC after suction
GroupValue95% CI
TEE Image Before and After Suction0.9030.849 – 0.941
Reproducibility of the Left Ventricular Fraction Area Change (LV FAC) (Intra-observer) Secondary · 6-8 months after initial images obtained during surgery

Investigator C assess all the image sets in one day again after 6-8 months to determine if there is intra-observer variability with the initial assessment of image quality, All investigators are blinded to which images are obtained before or after suction

intraclass correlation coefficients of LV FAC before suction
GroupValue95% CI
TEE Image Before and After Suction0.7160.536 – 0.833
intraclass correlation coefficients of LV FAC after suction
GroupValue95% CI
TEE Image Before and After Suction0.9350.887 – 0.963

Sponsor's own description

Image quality of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) tends to get worse during long hours of operations. An orogastric tube (OGT) is often inserted in the beginning of the case, and left there for intermittent suction as needed, or removed before TEE exam to prevent echoic artifacts. However, if left there, the effect of suction might be limited due to unreliable tip position of the OG tube. If removed, stomach will be distended again. We devised the OG tube attached TEE for practical suction and assessed its effect on image quality intraoperatively.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for TEE Image Quality

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Henry Ford Health System trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03454399.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing