3 out of 4 successful deployments was set as a criteria to allow advancement to part 2.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Staged Fall | 4 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Staged Fall | 0 |
Last reviewed · How we verify
Novel Helmet Design in Patients With Seizures
NA trial testing Hövding inflatable helmet in Drug Resistant Epilepsy in 9 participants. Completed in 20 March 2020.
| Lead sponsor | Michael A. Gelfand, MD, PhD |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | sequential |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | prevention |
| Enrollment | 9 |
| Start date | 14 August 2017 |
| Primary completion | 15 December 2019 |
| Estimated completion | 20 March 2020 |
| Sites | 1 location across United States |
Michael A. Gelfand, MD, PhD
Adults 18 to 60, any sex, with Drug Resistant Epilepsy or Drop Seizures. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
3 out of 4 successful deployments was set as a criteria to allow advancement to part 2.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Staged Fall | 4 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Staged Fall | 0 |
Differences in Helmet Deployment Questionnaire responses will be compared between subjects wearing helmets during a seizure, and subjects not wearing helmets during a seizure.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | 3 | |
| No Helmet | 2 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | 2 | |
| No Helmet | 2 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | 0 | |
| No Helmet | 1 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | 1 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | 2 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | 0 | |
| No Helmet | 2 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | 0 | |
| No Helmet | 1 |
Differences in head injury symptoms as reported using the Rivermead Post Concussive Scale will be compared between subjects wearing helmets during a seizure, and subjects not wearing helmets during a seizure, and also between subjects following a seizure in which the helmet deployed, and seizures in which the helmet was either not being worn or did not deploy. The scale for each item of this survey: 0 = not experienced at all 1 = no more of a problem 2 = a mild problem 3 = a moderate problem 4 = a severe problem. Each item was assessed as "compared with before the accident, do you now (i.e., o
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 2 Participant Data | 0 | 0 – 0 |
| Participants Randomized to no Helmet | 21.5 | 0 – 43 |
Differences in Seizure Questionnaire responses detailing circumstances of seizure and any injuries sustained will be compared between subjects wearing helmets during a seizure, and subjects not wearing helmets during a seizure, and also between subjects following a seizure in which the helmet deployed, and seizures in which the helmet was either not being worn or did not deploy.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 2 Participants Who Wore the Helmet | 0 | |
| Phase 2 Participants Not Wearing Helmet | 2 | |
| Phase 2 Participants Who Wore the Helmet | 3 | |
| Phase 2 Participants Not Wearing Helmet | 0 | |
| Phase 2 Participants Who Wore the Helmet | 2 | |
| Phase 2 Participants Not Wearing Helmet | 2 |
Differences in injuries resulting from a seizure per injury-related medical record review will be compared between subjects wearing helmets during a seizure, and subjects not wearing helmets during a seizure, and also between subjects following a seizure in which the helmet deployed, and seizures in which the helmet was either not being worn or did not deploy.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | 3 | |
| No Helmet | 2 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | 1 | |
| No Helmet | 2 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | 2 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | 1 |
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | 0 | |
| No Helmet | 2 |
Differences in helmet deployment questionnaire responses describing events of helmet deployment during seizures resulting in falls will be compared with responses describing helmet deployment (per day of use) not associated with seizure.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Helmet | 0 | |
| Helmet | 0 | |
| Helmet | 1 | |
| Helmet | 1 |
Time frame: 1 year. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
| Reaction | System | Phase 1 | Phase 2: Subjects Wearing … | Phase 2: Subjects Not Wear… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minor abrasions/head lacerations | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | — | — | — |
Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03443388 adverse events section.
This is a two-part study that aims to determine the reliability and safety of the use of the Hövding inflatable helmet in seizures, as evidenced by the deployment of the helmet during seizures, and qualitative patient reporting.
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Verify or expand the search:
Currently open trials in the same condition.
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03443388.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing