Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03396913

Effectiveness of Intense Pulsed Light for Improving Dry Eye Syndrome

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 9 December 2020
What this trial tests

NA trial testing IPL in Dry Eye Syndrome in 88 participants. Completed in 15 August 2019.

Timeline
10 January 2018
Primary endpoint
15 August 2019
15 August 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsorLumenis Be Ltd.
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment88
Start date10 January 2018
Primary completion15 August 2019
Estimated completion15 August 2019
Sites2 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Lumenis Be Ltd. — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 22 to 85, any sex, with Dry Eye Syndrome. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Change of Baseline Tear Breakup Time (TBUT) Primary · 10 weeks

Change of Tear breakup time (TBUT) in the study eye, from baseline to follow-up. TBUT is measured in seconds. Higher values mean better outcome.

GroupValue95% CI
Sham+MGX0.75± 0.34
IPL+MGX1.99± 0.36
Change From Baseline Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Secondary · 10 weeks

Change of self-assessed symptoms with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, from baseline to follow-up. OSDI was collected per patient (one number per patient). The minimal number is 0 and the maximal number is 100. Higher scores mean worse outcome. A score of 0-12 is considered normal. A score of 13-22 is consistent with mild dry eye. A score of 23 to 32 is consistent with moderate dry eye. A score from 33 to 100 is consistent with severe dry eye.

GroupValue95% CI
Sham+MGX-25.9± 3.6
IPL+MGX-29.89± 3.78
Change From Baseline Eye Dryness Score (EDS) Secondary · 10 weeks

Change of self-assessed symptoms on a visual analog scale (VAS) , from baseline to follow-up, in both eyes. Values were collected separately for each eye. Correlation between eyes was removed by statistical methods. Scores were 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Higher scores = worse outcome. VAS scores are not validated for dry eye. Hence, it is not known how to correlate VAS values to severity levels of dry eye. However, one can make estimations from the literature of VAS in other conditions. For example, in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, in a VAS scale of 0 to 10 scores below 3.4 co

GroupValue95% CI
Sham+MGX-25.9± 3.6
IPL+MGX-32.96± 3.97

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: 10 weeks. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Sham+MGX
Serious: 0/43 (0%)
Deaths: 0/43
IPL+MGX
Serious: 0/45 (0%)
Deaths: 0/45
Other adverse events (11 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemSham+MGXIPL+MGX
Sinus infectionGeneral disorders
worsening of seasonal allergiesGeneral disorders
BronchitisGeneral disorders
HyperlipidemiaGeneral disorders
Allergic conjunctivitisEye disorders
Bacterial conjunctivitisEye disorders
Conjunctival telangiectasiaEye disorders
BlepharitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ChalazionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
PainSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
StyeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03396913 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The aim of the current study is to examine the contribution of intense pulsed light (IPL) for relieving signs and symptoms of dry eye due to meibomian gland dysfunction. The effect of IPL will be examined in a study designed as a randomized controlled trial. In the study arm, subjects will undergo 4 treatment sessions, consisting of IPL pulses immediately followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX). In the control arm, subjects will undergo the same treatments, except that the IPL pulses will be disabled. For each subject, the duration of the study will be 10 weeks, as explained in the detailed description.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction.
    Cote S, Zhang AC, Ahmadzai V, Maleken A, et al · · 2020 · cited 47× · PMID 32182637 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013559

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of IPL

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Dry Eye Syndrome

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Lumenis Be Ltd. trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03396913.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing