Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT03385044
Comparison of Endotracheal Intracuff Pressure Between Two Cuff Sealing Methods
NA trial testing MOVT in Endotracheal Tube in 35 participants. Completed in 29 October 2018.
29 October 2018
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | DongGuk University |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | crossover |
| Masking | double |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 35 |
| Start date | 12 March 2018 |
| Primary completion | 29 October 2018 |
| Estimated completion | 29 October 2018 |
| Sites | 1 location across South Korea |
Drugs / interventions tested
- MOVT
- VE/VI ratio of Spirometer
Conditions studied
- Endotracheal Tube — all drugs for Endotracheal Tube →
Sponsor
DongGuk University
Who can join
Adults 20 to 60, female only, with Endotracheal Tube. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
The endotracheal intracuff pressure is to be maintained at a low level to prevent trachea and nerve damages, and yet be high enough to secure air sealing. The objective of the study is to compare minimal occlusive volume technique (MOVT) and expired volume/inspired volume ratio (VE/VI ratio) from a spirometer method of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff inflation with respect to the cuff pressure required to seal the airway during a laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. A study design is a randomized crossover trial in 35 patients. The primary outcome is the intracuff pressure of an endotracheal tube. The study consists of two cuff sealing methods separated by a period of 10 minutes.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
-
Does the minimal occlusive volume technique provide adequate endotracheal tube cuff pressure to prevent air leakage?: a prospective, randomized, crossover clinical study.
Park HY, Kim M, In J. · · 2020 · cited 6× · PMID 33329837 · DOI 10.17085/apm.20020
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT03385044
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Endotracheal Tube
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT07148024 — Cuff Pressure and Airway Edema in CABG With CPB · NA · recruiting
- NCT06510387 — Two Bedside Ultrasound Techniques and Standard Methods for Confirmation of Endotracheal Tube Insertion in Intensive Care · recruiting
Other DongGuk University trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07076628 — Respiratory Depression of Remimazolam vs. Propofol for Monitored Anesthesia Care · Phase 4 · completed
- NCT05999500 — The Effectiveness of Temple Stay in Irritable Bowel Syndrome · recruiting
- NCT06427109 — Omega-3 Fatty Acid and Colorectal Adenoma · completed
- NCT04691674 — Optimal Placement Duration of Pancreatic Duct Stent · NA · completed
- NCT04072328 — Propofol vs. Midazolam With Propofol for Sedative Endoscopy in Patients With Previous Paradoxical Reaction to Midazolam · Phase 2 · completed
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03385044 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by DongGuk University
- Last refreshed: 14 December 2018
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03385044.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing