Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT03367611
Use of iFOBT in Patients Presenting With Alarm Symptoms of Colorectal Cancer
NA trial testing Immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) in Colorectal Neoplasms in 1,258 participants. Completed in 31 December 2019.
31 December 2019
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | University of Aarhus |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | na |
| Design | single group |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | diagnostic |
| Enrollment | 1,258 |
| Start date | 15 March 2018 |
| Primary completion | 31 December 2019 |
| Estimated completion | 31 December 2019 |
| Sites | 1 location across Denmark |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT)
Conditions studied
- Colorectal Neoplasms — all drugs for Colorectal Neoplasms →
- Colorectal Cancer — all drugs for Colorectal Cancer →
- Colorectal Carcinoma — all drugs for Colorectal Carcinoma →
- Colorectal Adenoma — all drugs for Colorectal Adenoma →
Sponsor
University of Aarhus
Who can join
40 and older, any sex, with Colorectal Neoplasms or Colorectal Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common types of cancer in Denmark, and mortality among patients is high. Patients presenting with alarm symptoms of CRC are referred to colonoscopy in the cancer patient pathway for CRC. However, the proportion of patients with alarm symptoms who have CRC is below 10%. Simultaneously, the burden on endoscopy units to conduct fast-track colonoscopies is growing. Occult blood in the faeces may be an early sign of cancer or precancerous lesions, and can be detected by an immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT). Few studies have examined the diagnostic properties of the iFOBT among symptomatic patients, and reported sensitivities ranging from 88%-100%, specificities from 77%-94%, and negative predictive values from 98%-100%. These results were derived from diverse patient populations, and used different cut-offs to define positive test results. Using iFOBT may be a valuable tool for the GP when deciding on referral of the patient to the cancer patient pathway. However, evidence is needed on the diagnostic accuracy of the test to detect CRC among patients presenting with alarm symptoms. Hypothesis: In patients presenting with alarm symptoms of CRC, detection of faecal occult blood by iFOBT is an accurate measure of the presence of colonic lesions. Aim: The aim of the study is to examine the diagnostic accuracy of the iFOBT among symptomatic patients referred to colonoscopy in the cancer patient pathway for CRC. Materials and methods: The project is conducted as a diagnostic accuracy study. Patients appointed for colonoscopy will be invited to collect a faecal sample and mail it for analysis. The iFOBT result will be registered in a computer-based laboratory information system. The result of the colonoscopy will be registered in Danish national health registries. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be calculated as measures of the diagnostic properties of the iFOBT, using the result of colonoscopy as the reference standard. The accuracy of the test by type of alarm symptom will also be assessed. Perspectives: The study will provide new and valuable data to evaluate the referral criteria for the cancer patient pathway. Given a good discriminatory ability of the iFOBT among symptomatic patients, fast-track colonoscopy may not be necessary as a first-choice examination in the diagnostic work-up of these patients.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT03367611
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Colorectal Neoplasms
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT06983639 — Randomized Trial Comparing Fecal Testing (FIT) to Colonoscopy for Post-polypectomy Surveillance · NA · recruiting
- NCT07222800 — Symbiotic-GI-03: A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08634404 in Combination With Chemotherapy in Adult · Phase 3 · recruiting
- NCT07239479 — DEXDES Trial: Dexmedetomidine-Desflurane Combination in Laparoscopic Colectomy · NA · recruiting
- NCT07262840 — Health Behavior Change in High-Risk Colorectal Cancer Individuals · NA · recruiting
- NCT07257653 — The Safety and Efficacy of Cetuximab Beta Plus Fruquintinib With or Without Immune Checkpoint Inhibitorrs in First-line · Phase 2 · recruiting
Other University of Aarhus trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07209540 — European LUpuS Inception-Cohort Developing initiATivE · not yet recruiting
- NCT07317401 — Investigating the Effects of Intermittent Hypoxia-Hyperoxia Treatment (IHHT) in People With Post-Viral Myalgic Encephalo · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07531966 — Vascular Complications After Kidney Transplantation · recruiting
- NCT07528339 — Prospective RegIstry for Oncologic Reirradiation (PRIOR-DK) · not yet recruiting
- NCT07451028 — Effect of an Oral Neuromuscular Training Device on Dysphagia · NA · not yet recruiting
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03367611 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by University of Aarhus
- Last refreshed: 2 March 2020
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03367611.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing