Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03361254: cryo-ECP

Cryopreservation of White Blood Cells Before Their UVA Irradiation for Graft Versus Host Disease Treatment

Status unknown NA Last updated 27 January 2020
What this trial tests

NA trial testing cryopreservation in Graft Versus Host Disease in 5 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
31 March 2020
Primary endpoint
30 June 2020
30 September 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, France
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment5
Start date31 March 2020
Primary completion30 June 2020
Estimated completion30 September 2020

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Graft Versus Host Disease. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a worldwide recognized treatment of acute and chronic mild to moderate graft versus host disease (GVHD), in second or further line of treatment. Contrary to immunosuppressive drugs, ECP is not associated with side effects such as opportunistic infections, and is not associated with a higher frequency of relapse of the initial hematological disease. High intensity of ECP regimen (1 to 3 sessions per week, in case of chronic or acute GVHD) seems to be correlated to a higher efficacy. However, high intensity of ECP treatment is often difficult to sustain, because of frequent logistical problems to perform aphereses, such as venous access failure, infections of central line, deep blood cytopenias that require many transfusions before performing aphereses. Merlin et al. first described the feasibility of white blood cells cryopreservation before UVA irradiation, in vitro, then in vivo. We also recently reported the feasibility and efficacy of cryopreserved ECP in a series of 20 patients (adults and children), with acute and chronic GVHD, who had recurrent contraindications to aphereses, that prevented the realization of an intensive program of ECP. No adverse events occurred, and efficacy seemed to be similar to "classical" ECP (35% of complete overall response, and 40% of partial response). White blood cells (WBC) were divided after collection on Optia or Cellex apheresis machines: one was immediately treated with 8-MOP (methoxsalen) and ultraviolet A (UVA) irradiation, while the other was cryopreserved, and further (a few days later) thawed, sensitized with 8-MOP and irradiated before injection to the patient. The aim of this study is to analyze this method in a prospective way, with complete biological data collection, of apoptosis, cytokines release etc…, necessary to the full description of cryopreservation of white blood cells before their irradiation and reinjection to the patient. We will propose this technique of cryopreservation to every patient with an indication of ECP for acute or chronic GVHD in Nancy Hospital for 18 months.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of cryopreservation

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Graft Versus Host Disease

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Central Hospital, Nancy, France trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03361254.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing