Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT03360357
Laparoscopic Vaginal Cuff Suturing Profienciency for OBGYN Residents
NA trial testing Guided drills in Educational Problems. Withdrawn.
30 September 2020
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Mayo Clinic |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Withdrawn |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | health services research |
| Start date | 1 September 2019 |
| Primary completion | 30 September 2020 |
| Estimated completion | 30 September 2020 |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Guided drills
Conditions studied
- Educational Problems — all drugs for Educational Problems →
Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Who can join
18 and older, any sex, with Educational Problems. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
A recent survey of obstetrics and gynecology fellowship program directors showed that graduating OB/GYN residents may be underprepared for advanced laparoscopic training, necessitating an evaluation of the current structure of resident and fellow curriculum. Specifically, only 46% of first year fellows were able to independently perform an abdominal hysterectomy. Out of 28 residents tested using a previously validated laparoscopic cuff suturing model, only 8 (28.6%) passed the assessment. For this reason, it is necessary to identify the most effective and efficient educational approaches to obtain procedural proficiency. Time and effort has been placed in developing simulation programs. Simulation has shown promising outcomes in improving the performance of trainees and attending physicians with the ultimate objective of generating better surgeons. A previous meta-analysis of simulation-based educational assessments demonstrated that these assessments correlate positively with patient-related outcomes. However, there are limited studies with adequate validity to use simulation for summative evaluations of performance for gynecology residents. The widely used Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program is used for credentialing of general surgeons, however, a systematic review suggested that more validity evidence is required to support its content (selection of tasks and scoring rubric) and the consequences (favorable and unfavorable impact) assessment. Although there has been an increase in the number of models available to teach OB/GYN common gynecologic procedures, there is a lack of evidence to support that these methods are actually allowing residents to create better surgical skills. To address the current limitations in OB/GYN training, the investigators have developed short, guided drills that cover the steps required for laparoscopic suturing and allow residents opportunities for deliberate practice. These drills will be tested compared to residents watching a laparoscopic suturing video and practicing using a high fidelity, suturing simulation model. Both of these methods are standard educational approaches for teaching laparoscopic skills, but it is unknown if one of the approaches is more effective than the other.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT03360357
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Educational Problems
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT06941753 — Off-script Diagnosis & Differential Diagnosis (D&D) Training and Residents' Stroke Knowledge · NA · recruiting
- NCT06989528 — Midwifery Students' Opinions on Educational Material Development and Evaluation in Birth Education · active not recruiting
- NCT06765096 — Impact of Virtual Reality Model for Pelvic Floor Anatomy on Users' Educational Level and Experience · NA · recruiting
- NCT06772389 — Teaching Electronic Fetal Monitoring to Midwifery Students With Peer Teaching Method · NA · recruiting
- NCT06695650 — The Effect of Mandala Coloring Activity on Test Anxiety · NA · recruiting
Other Mayo Clinic trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07126548 — A Point of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Virtual Reality Assistant Intervention in Supporting Newly Diagnosed Black Men · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07221656 — Evaluation of Prolonged Asparaginase Activity Levels After Calaspargase Pegol Administration · not yet recruiting
- NCT06891001 — The Utilization of a Shoe Insert on Individuals With Unilateral Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome on Single Leg Stance, · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07169799 — Impact of Cryotherapy Spray (Tru-Freeze) for the Eradication of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia (ICE-GAVE) · NA · recruiting
- NCT07086183 — Perioperative Risk in Patients on Chronic Aspirin Undergoing Craniotomy · not yet recruiting
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03360357 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Mayo Clinic
- Last refreshed: 13 April 2020
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03360357.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing