Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03322826

Systematic Sampling of Lymph Nodes vs. Lymphadenectomy According to Intraoperative Frozen Pathology for Pulmonary Invasive Adenocarcinoma With Ground-glass Opacity

Status unknown NA Last updated 19 December 2017
What this trial tests

NA trial testing systematic sampling of the lymph-node in Lymph Node Excision in 600 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
8 December 2017
Primary endpoint
28 October 2021
28 October 2023

Quick facts

Lead sponsorShanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment600
Start date8 December 2017
Primary completion28 October 2021
Estimated completion28 October 2023
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China

Who can join

Adults 18 to 80, any sex, with Lymph Node Excision. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of systematic sampling of lymph nodes vs. lymphadenectomy on outcome according to intraoperative frozen pathology for pulmonary invasive adenocarcinoma with ground-glass opacity (GGO) after VATS lobectomy.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. The number of metastatic lymph nodes is more predictive of prognosis than location-based N stage for nonsmall cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
    Xu L, Si H, Su H, Wang F, et al · · 2023 · cited 9× · PMID 37755369 · DOI 10.1097/js9.0000000000000723

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Lymph Node Excision

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03322826.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing