18 and older, any sex, with Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change in Median (Headache Impact Test-6) HIT-6 Score From BaselinePrimary· Baseline, 1 month
Absolute change in median HIT-6 score from pre-procedural baseline to 1 month post procedure for each group. The HIT-6 consists of six items: pain, social functioning, role functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, and psychological distress. The patient answers each of the six related questions using one of the following five responses: "never", "rarely", "sometimes", "very often", or "always". These responses are summed to produce a total HIT-6 score that ranges from 36 to 78, where a higher score indicates a greater impact of headache on the daily life of the respondent.
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
-12
-16 – -7
Simulated Patching Procedure
-7
-13 – -1
Change in Median HIT-6 Score From BaselineSecondary· Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 months
Absolute change in median HIT-6 score from pre-procedural baseline to 2 weeks and 4 months post procedure for each group. The HIT-6 consists of six items: pain, social functioning, role functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, and psychological distress. The patient answers each of the six related questions using one of the following five responses: "never", "rarely", "sometimes", "very often", or "always". These responses are summed to produce a total HIT-6 score that ranges from 36 to 78, where a higher score indicates a greater impact of headache on the daily life of the respondent.
2 weeks
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
-5.5
-10 – 0.5
Simulated Patching Procedure
-7
-17 – -3
4 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
-4.5
-16.5 – -1.5
Simulated Patching Procedure
-12
-24 – -7
Reduction in Median Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Score From BaselineSecondary· Baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 months
The MIDAS questionnaire assesses headache-related disability. Patients answer five questions, scoring the number of days, in the past 3 months, where their activity was limited due to headache. A higher score indicates greater headache-related disability. This tool has been shown to be internally consistent, highly reliable, valid, and correlates with physicians' clinical judgment. MIDAS Scale Range: 0 - 270
2 weeks
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
-25
-55 – 6
Simulated Patching Procedure
16
-35 – 100
1 month
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
-62.5
-117 – -37
Simulated Patching Procedure
-40
-86 – -3
4 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
-87
-134.5 – -69.5
Simulated Patching Procedure
-53
-210 – -22
Change in Median NRS Score From BaselineSecondary· Baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 months
The pain numerical rating scale (NRS) is a well-validated tool for quantitatively assessing patients' pain. The NRS asks patients to rate their current pain intensity on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). It has been found to be a valid measure of pain intensity with minimum clinically important difference noted to be a change of 2 points. The investigators will use NRS averaged over the past 24 hours for all time points in this trial. The Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) consensus statement indicates
2 weeks
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
-0.5
-1.5 – 1
Simulated Patching Procedure
-1
-3 – 0
1 month
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
-2.5
-4.5 – -1
Simulated Patching Procedure
0
-3 – 3
4 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
-1.5
-5 – -0.5
Simulated Patching Procedure
-2
-3 – -1
Change in Median EQ-5D (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) Score From BaselineSecondary· Baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 months
The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status that provides a simple, generic measure of health for clinical appraisal. It is well-validated for health status measurement and for quality-of-life in headache. Scores on the EQ-5D were calculated using the United States 3L, time trade off (TTO) valuation technique. Scores range from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating perfect health.
2 weeks
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
0.1
0 – 0.2
Simulated Patching Procedure
0.1
-0.1 – 0.3
1 month
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
0
0 – 0.4
Simulated Patching Procedure
0.1
0 – 0.4
4 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
0
-0.1 – 0.1
Simulated Patching Procedure
0.2
0.1 – 0.4
Change in Median WPAI (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment) Score From BaselineSecondary· Baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 months
The WPAI is a validated instrument with good test-retest reliability used extensively in health research that quantifies impairment in daily activities and work productivity. Scores on the WPAI range from 0 - 100% with higher percentages indicating greater impact on work productivity and more severe activity impairment.
2 weeks
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
1.3
-16.9 – 13.5
Simulated Patching Procedure
-0.3
-8.8 – 3.6
1 month
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
-13.8
-51 – 5
Simulated Patching Procedure
-2.3
-20.8 – 20
4 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
-9
-29 – 13.7
Simulated Patching Procedure
-28.5
-47 – -10
Change in PGIC (Patient Global Impression of Change) Score From BaselineSecondary· Baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 months
PGIC is a validated 7-point Likert-type scale assessing a patient's overall impression of improvement after intervention. Scores range from 1 - 7 (1: no change or worsening of condition; 2: almost the same, hardly any change at all; 3: a little better, but no noticeable change; 4: somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference; 5: moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change; 6: better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference; 7: a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference) with higher scores i
2 weeks
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
3.5
3 – 4.5
Simulated Patching Procedure
2
1 – 4
1 month
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
4
3 – 5.5
Simulated Patching Procedure
3
1 – 5
4 months
Group
Value
95% CI
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
4.5
3.5 – 6
Simulated Patching Procedure
6
2 – 6
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Adverse event data were collected immediately after the initial procedure, immediately after any crossover procedures (performed at the 2-month time point), and also at 1 week after any procedure (initial or crossover)..
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Targeted Epidural Patching of CSF Leaks With Autologous Blood and Fibrin Glue
The goal of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to compare the efficacy of CT fluoroscopy-guided targeted epidural patching for treatment of imaging-confirmed spinal CSF leaks to that of a simulated procedure without patching material in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Duke University
Last refreshed: 18 June 2021
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03276975.