Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03267264

Evaluating the User Performance and Experience of Nucleus Pen vs. Commercially Available Pen Needle

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 16 July 2019
What this trial tests

NA trial testing BD Nano™ vs Nucleus in Diabetes in 248 participants. Completed in 24 May 2018.

Timeline
1 September 2017
Primary endpoint
24 April 2018
24 May 2018

Quick facts

Lead sponsorBecton, Dickinson and Company
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designcrossover
Maskingnone
Primary purposeother
Enrollment248
Start date1 September 2017
Primary completion24 April 2018
Estimated completion24 May 2018
Sites4 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Becton, Dickinson and Company — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 18 to 75, any sex, with Diabetes. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Overall User Preference -Combined Groups Primary · 30 Days

This is a combined endpoint for all study subjects. User preference is assessed through a single question reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the Nucleus Pen labeled at +75 mm and the subject's current pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference for BD Nucleus and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator (current pen needle).

GroupValue95% CI
Combined Groups17.510.3 – 24.7
Overall User Preference - Each Comparator Group Secondary · 30 Days

This endpoint analyzes data for individual groups. User preference is assessed through a single question reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the Nucleus Pen labeled at +75 mm and the subject's current pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference for BD Nucleus and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator (current pen needle).

GroupValue95% CI
Group 130.516.8 – 44.3
Group 220.64.1 – 37.1
Group 36.2-7.2 – 19.5
Group 412.8-1.1 – 26.7
User Experience - All Study Groups Combined Secondary · 30 Days

This is a combined endpoint for all study subjects. User experience is assessed through a series of questions reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the Nucleus Pen labeled at +75 mm and the subject's current pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference for BD Nucleus and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator (current pen needle). Questions include the subject's perception of: Overall Comfort, Anxiety Associated with a Needle Stick Injury, Inj

Overall Comfort
GroupValue95% CI
All Groups Combined18.011.3 – 24.7
Anxiety Associated with a Needle Stick Injury
GroupValue95% CI
All Groups Combined15.99.9 – 21.8
Injection Pain
GroupValue95% CI
All Groups Combined15.58.9 – 22.1
Ease of Use
GroupValue95% CI
All Groups Combined19.713.8 – 25.7
User Experience - Each Individual Study Group Secondary · 30 Days

This endpoint analyzes data for individual groups. User experience is assessed through a series of questions reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the Nucleus Pen labeled at +75 mm and the subject's current pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference for BD Nucleus and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator (current pen needle). Questions include the subject's perception of: Overall Comfort, Anxiety Associated with a Needle Stick Injury, Inje

Overall Comfort
GroupValue95% CI
Group 127.814.9 – 40.7
Group 220.75.3 – 36.1
Group 38.4-4 – 20.9
Group 415.12.1 – 28.1
Anxiety Associated with a Needle Stick Injury
GroupValue95% CI
Group 120.28.9 – 31.6
Group 219.46 – 32.8
Group 312.91.9 – 23.8
Group 411.0-0.5 – 22.4
Injection Pain
GroupValue95% CI
Group 116.13.4 – 28.8
Group 218.63.6 – 33.7
Group 37.0-5.3 – 19.4
Group 420.27.4 – 33.1
Ease of Use
GroupValue95% CI
Group 130.719.3 – 42.1
Group 218.44.9 – 31.9
Group 317.76.7 – 28.8
Group 412.00.5 – 23.5

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Adverse Events were collected over 6 week period.. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Nucleus
Serious: 1/241 (0%)
Deaths: 0/241
BD Nano
Serious: 0/65 (0%)
Deaths: 0/65
NovoFine®
Serious: 1/49 (2%)
Deaths: 0/49
NovoTwist®/NovoFine®
Serious: 0/66 (0%)
Deaths: 0/66
Other Commercially Available Pen Needles (Unifine® Pentips®/M
Serious: 1/61 (2%)
Deaths: 0/61

Serious adverse events (3 terms)

ReactionSystemNucleusBD NanoNovoFine®NovoTwist®/NovoFine®Other Commercially Availab…
Broken Right AnkleSurgical and medical procedures
Infection of L Hand LacerationInfections and infestations
InfluenzaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other adverse events (12 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemNucleusBD NanoNovoFine®NovoTwist®/NovoFine®Other Commercially Availab…
BleedingInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
BruisingInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Swelling/Pain at injection siteInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
HypoglycemiaEndocrine disorders
Abcess under chinInfections and infestations
Common ColdRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders
L hand LacerationSurgical and medical procedures
Respiratory IllnessRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Stomach UlcerGastrointestinal disorders
Worsening of Type 2 DiabetesEndocrine disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Broken Right Ankle, Infection of L Hand Laceration, Influenza.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03267264 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This is a multi-site, prospective, open-label, randomized, 2 period cross over study comparing the subjects' current 32G pen needle (four groups of pen needles) to the BD Nucleus pen needle. The study will consist of two 15 day periods ( in which the subject will use each pen needle \[BD Nucleus pen needle or subject's current pen needle, order randomized\] for injection. At the end of the last study period, each subject will be asked to evaluate his or her perceptions using a 150mm relative VAS scale.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Evaluating the User Performance and Experience with a Re-Engineered 4 mm × 32G Pen Needle: A Randomized Trial with Similar Length/Gauge Needles.
    Whooley S, Briskin T, Gibney MA, Blank LR, et al · · 2019 · cited 9× · PMID 30809762 · DOI 10.1007/s13300-019-0585-7

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Diabetes

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Becton, Dickinson and Company trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03267264.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing