Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03247829: INTELLECT 2-HF

Investigation to Optimize Hemodynamic Management of Left Ventricular Assist Devices Using the CardioMEMS™

Completed Results posted Last updated 26 April 2024
What this trial tests

trial testing Hemodynamic management using CardioMEMS HF System in Heart Failure in 101 participants. Completed in 30 June 2020.

Timeline
24 August 2017
Primary endpoint
6 March 2020
30 June 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorAbbott Medical Devices
StatusCompleted
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment101
Start date24 August 2017
Primary completion6 March 2020
Estimated completion30 June 2020
Sites23 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Abbott Medical Devices — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Heart Failure. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Six Minute Hall Walk (6MHW) Distance Primary · Six Months

Change in 6MHW distance compared to baseline. The six-minute hall walk (6MHW) test measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes.

GroupValue95% CI
Group A-44.9± 135.0
Group B69.7± 100.6
Change in PA Diastolic Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months Secondary · six months

Changes in PA diastolic pressure measurement over time from baseline to 6 months follow-up.

GroupValue95% CI
Group A0.6± 4.2
Group B-1.7± 5.6
Days PA Diastolic Pressure is in the Pre-specified Target Range Secondary · six months

Average number of days PA diastolic pressure was in the pre-specified target range of 8-15 mmHg. For this measure, both arms were combined to assess the mean number of days, all study subjects spent in the target PA diastolic range. This was pre-defined as a whole population analysis.

GroupValue95% CI
All Patients28.2± 39.0
PA Diastolic Pressure Before 6MHW Test to After 6MHW Test Secondary · 6 months

Pulmonary Artery Diastolic Pressure collected using the CardioMEMS-HF system before and after the 6MHW test.

GroupValue95% CI
Group A Pre 6MHW Test13.9± 7.2
Group A Post 6MHW Test16.3± 6.8
Group B Pre 6MHW Test15.8± 8.2
Group B Post 6MHW Test19.8± 10.6
Number of Subjects With Either CardioMEMS or HeartMate Device Malfunctions Secondary · six months

Loss of performance, such as inability to submit pressure data for CardioMEMS and/or Pump failure for LVAD. This measure is independent of study arm as both patients had both devices at enrollment. This was pre-defined as a whole population analysis.

GroupValue95% CI
All Patients99
All Patients1
All Patients1
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification Secondary · six months

Change in NYHA classification from baseline assessed at 6 months. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification stratifies patients' heart failure (HF) by the severity of their symptoms. I - No limitation of physical activity. II - Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. III - Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. IV - Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

GroupValue95% CI
Group A0.12-0.11 – 0.35
Group B-0.10-0.32 – 0.11
EQ-5D-5L VAS Secondary · six months

Health related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L self-reported questionnaire includes a visual analog scale (VAS), which records the respondent's self-rated health status on a graduated (0-100) scale, with higher scores for higher quality of life. For this measure, both arms were combined to assess the mean of and changes to the EQ-5D-5L VAS for all study subjects, as all subjects were treated the same and had the same devices once enrolled. This was pre-defined as a whole population analysis.

GroupValue95% CI
Group A-1.4-7.7 – 4.9
Group B3.0-3.2 – 9.1
Number and Percent of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations. Secondary · six months

Number and percent of participants who were hospitalized for any cause during follow-up.

GroupValue95% CI
Group A27
Group B25
Number and Percent of Participants With Worsening Heart Failure Events Secondary · six months

Worsening HF events incudes emergency department visits, or unscheduled clinic visits for worsening HF, volume management, and/or cardiovascular medication management.

GroupValue95% CI
Group A10
Group B14

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: 6 months. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

All Patients
Serious: 36/101 (36%)
Deaths: 7/101

Serious adverse events (13 terms)

ReactionSystemAll Patients
Worsening Heart FailureCardiac disorders
Syncope/presyncope/dizziness and hypovolemiaCardiac disorders
Cardiac arrhythmiasCardiac disorders
Right heart failureCardiac disorders
OtherGeneral disorders
Renal dysfunction secondary to heart failureRenal and urinary disorders
Other neurological eventNervous system disorders
Respiratory failure secondary to cardiovascular causeVascular disorders
Strokes regardless of their type and etiologyNervous system disorders
PneumoniaInfections and infestations
HypotensionCardiac disorders
Over-diuresisRenal and urinary disorders
Volume OverloadCardiac disorders
Other adverse events (1 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemAll Patients
Non-serious Adverse Device EffectsCardiac disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Worsening Heart Failure, Syncope/presyncope/dizziness and hypovolemia, Cardiac arrhythmias, Right heart failure, Other, Renal dysfunction secondary to heart failure, Other neurological event, Respiratory failure secondary to cardiovascular cause.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03247829 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This observational post market study is intended to characterize hemodynamic-guided management of patients with an existing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) to protocol specified target ranges and its impact on functional status, quality of life, and readmissions

Publications & conference data

5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. LVAD as a Bridge to Remission from Advanced Heart Failure: Current Data and Opportunities for Improvement.
    Kyriakopoulos CP, Kapelios CJ, Stauder EL, Taleb I, et al · · 2022 · cited 20× · PMID 35743611 · DOI 10.3390/jcm11123542
  2. Clinical Update of the Latest Evidence for CardioMEMS Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Promising System for Remote Heart Failure Care.
    Brugts JJ, Radhoe SP, Aydin D, Theuns DA, et al · · 2021 · cited 20× · PMID 33801573 · DOI 10.3390/s21072335
  3. Use of a Pulmonary Artery Pressure Sensor to Manage Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.
    Thohan V, Abraham J, Burdorf A, Sulemanjee N, et al · · 2023 · cited 17× · PMID 37079511 · DOI 10.1161/circheartfailure.122.009960
  4. Changes in pulmonary artery pressure before and after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients utilizing remote haemodynamic monitoring.
    Kilic A, Katz JN, Joseph SM, Brisco-Bacik MA, et al · · 2019 · cited 17× · PMID 30350926 · DOI 10.1002/ehf2.12373
  5. Telemonitoring in Heart Failure Management.
    Planinc I, Milicic D, Cikes M. · · 2020 · cited 12× · PMID 32377385 · DOI 10.15420/cfr.2019.12

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Heart Failure

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Abbott Medical Devices trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03247829.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing