18 and older, any sex, with Heart Failure. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Six Minute Hall Walk (6MHW) DistancePrimary· Six Months
Change in 6MHW distance compared to baseline. The six-minute hall walk (6MHW) test measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A
-44.9
± 135.0
Group B
69.7
± 100.6
Change in PA Diastolic Pressure From Baseline to 6 MonthsSecondary· six months
Changes in PA diastolic pressure measurement over time from baseline to 6 months follow-up.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A
0.6
± 4.2
Group B
-1.7
± 5.6
Days PA Diastolic Pressure is in the Pre-specified Target RangeSecondary· six months
Average number of days PA diastolic pressure was in the pre-specified target range of 8-15 mmHg. For this measure, both arms were combined to assess the mean number of days, all study subjects spent in the target PA diastolic range. This was pre-defined as a whole population analysis.
Group
Value
95% CI
All Patients
28.2
± 39.0
PA Diastolic Pressure Before 6MHW Test to After 6MHW TestSecondary· 6 months
Pulmonary Artery Diastolic Pressure collected using the CardioMEMS-HF system before and after the 6MHW test.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A Pre 6MHW Test
13.9
± 7.2
Group A Post 6MHW Test
16.3
± 6.8
Group B Pre 6MHW Test
15.8
± 8.2
Group B Post 6MHW Test
19.8
± 10.6
Number of Subjects With Either CardioMEMS or HeartMate Device MalfunctionsSecondary· six months
Loss of performance, such as inability to submit pressure data for CardioMEMS and/or Pump failure for LVAD. This measure is independent of study arm as both patients had both devices at enrollment. This was pre-defined as a whole population analysis.
Group
Value
95% CI
All Patients
99
All Patients
1
All Patients
1
New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassificationSecondary· six months
Change in NYHA classification from baseline assessed at 6 months. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification stratifies patients' heart failure (HF) by the severity of their symptoms.
I - No limitation of physical activity. II - Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. III - Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. IV - Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A
0.12
-0.11 – 0.35
Group B
-0.10
-0.32 – 0.11
EQ-5D-5L VASSecondary· six months
Health related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). The EQ-5D-5L self-reported questionnaire includes a visual analog scale (VAS), which records the respondent's self-rated health status on a graduated (0-100) scale, with higher scores for higher quality of life. For this measure, both arms were combined to assess the mean of and changes to the EQ-5D-5L VAS for all study subjects, as all subjects were treated the same and had the same devices once enrolled. This was pre-defined as a whole population analysis.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A
-1.4
-7.7 – 4.9
Group B
3.0
-3.2 – 9.1
Number and Percent of Participants With All-cause Hospitalizations.Secondary· six months
Number and percent of participants who were hospitalized for any cause during follow-up.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A
27
Group B
25
Number and Percent of Participants With Worsening Heart Failure EventsSecondary· six months
Worsening HF events incudes emergency department visits, or unscheduled clinic visits for worsening HF, volume management, and/or cardiovascular medication management.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A
10
Group B
14
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: 6 months.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
All Patients
Serious: 36/101 (36%)
Deaths: 7/101
Serious adverse events (13 terms)
Reaction
System
All Patients
Worsening Heart Failure
Cardiac disorders
—
Syncope/presyncope/dizziness and hypovolemia
Cardiac disorders
—
Cardiac arrhythmias
Cardiac disorders
—
Right heart failure
Cardiac disorders
—
Other
General disorders
—
Renal dysfunction secondary to heart failure
Renal and urinary disorders
—
Other neurological event
Nervous system disorders
—
Respiratory failure secondary to cardiovascular cause
This observational post market study is intended to characterize hemodynamic-guided management of patients with an existing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) to protocol specified target ranges and its impact on functional status, quality of life, and readmissions
Publications & conference data
5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Abbott Medical Devices
Last refreshed: 26 April 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03247829.