Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT03207373
Stress ECG Test for the Evaluation of the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in a Paediatric Cohort With WPW Pattern
NA trial testing Stress test (ECG) in Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome in 3 participants. Terminated before completion.
30 January 2024
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Christian Balmer |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Terminated |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | na |
| Design | single group |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | screening |
| Enrollment | 3 |
| Start date | 13 April 2017 |
| Primary completion | 30 January 2024 |
| Estimated completion | 30 January 2024 |
| Sites | 1 location across Switzerland |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Stress test (ECG)
Conditions studied
- Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome — all drugs for Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome →
- Sudden Cardiac Death — all drugs for Sudden Cardiac Death →
- Risk Stratification — all drugs for Risk Stratification →
Sponsor
Christian Balmer
Who can join
Adults 8 to 18, any sex, with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome or Sudden Cardiac Death. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Patients with preexcitation are at risk for sudden cardiac death. The pathogenesis is a rapid antegrade conduction of atrial fibrillation over the accessory pathway to the ventricle resulting in ventricular fibrillation. Today it is possible to eliminate the conduction over the accessory pathway by catheter intervention (radiofrequency ablation) with a low rate of complications and a high rate of success. In clinical practice it is therefore important to estimate the risk for sudden cardiac death in an individual patient to give an advice to the patient and the parents about the further evaluation and therapeutic strategy. The velocity of the conduction over the accessory pathway can be estimated by analysing the ECG during sinus tachycardia. If the preexcitation disappears at a relatively low heart rate, the risk for sudden death is less than in patients with persisting preexcitation at the maximal heart rate. Compared to the gold standard i.e. measurement of the refractory period of the accessory pathway during invasive electrophysiological study (EPS), the measurements at the stress ECG have been reported to be a relatively poor indicator for an elevated risk which may be explained by a high intraindividual variability of this test. This study is designed to define the clinical relevance of the stress ECG in paediatric patients with preexcitation (compared to the invasive electrophysiological study). First Hypothesis: The results of the 3 stress ECG-tests are reproducible in an individual patient. Null hypothesis: there is no difference between the three measurements of cycle length during stress ECG. Alternate hypothesis: the difference between the three measurements of cycle length is \> 10%. Second Hypothesis: There is a close correlation between the results at stress ECG and the results at the invasive electrophysiological Intervention.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT03207373
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03207373 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Christian Balmer
- Last refreshed: 1 February 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03207373.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing