Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03189147

BicepsTenodesis vs. Biceps Debridement in Combined RC Tears and SLAP Lesions

Terminated NA Last updated 22 September 2021
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Biceps Tenodesis in SLAP Lesion in 20 participants. Terminated before completion.

Timeline
15 January 2018
Primary endpoint
29 August 2019
29 August 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Alberta
PhaseNA
StatusTerminated
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment20
Start date15 January 2018
Primary completion29 August 2019
Estimated completion29 August 2019
Sites1 location across Canada

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Alberta

Who can join

35 and older, any sex, with SLAP Lesion. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The appropriate treatment of labral lesions such as SLAP tears in patients undergoing RC tears repair is controversial. Most surgeons are reluctant to repair RC and SLAP tears simultaneously due to the high likelihood of prolonged postoperative immobilization, stiffness and poor clinical outcomes. The current standard care interventions include debridement, biceps tenotomy or tenodesis rather than surgical repair of SLAP tears. Simple debridement is a low cost and time-saving procedure that has the advantage of maintaining the anatomy of the long head of biceps (LHB), a muscle that acts as an active depressor of the head of the humerus in patients with RC tears. Biceps tenotomy is also low cost and time-saving; however, since the LHB is released from its attachment in the shoulder joint, the anatomy is not preserved and results in decreased strength and possible development of a 'Popeye' deformity. Biceps tenodesis has higher costs and time than the other two approaches, but has the advantage of preserving the LHB anatomy and power, and a lower possibility of developing complications. Finally, labral repair has the highest costs and associated surgical time and may lead to increase stiffness after surgery, particularly in patients over 45 years old. Currently, the standard care of the surgeons involved in this study is to use either debridement or biceps tenodesis to address labral lesions in patients undergoing surgery for their RC tear. Based on the current evidence and current practice in our facility, we aim to compare the efficacy of tenodesis versus debridement in patients with combined RC tear, degenerative labrum (SLAP tears) and a normal biceps tendon.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Biceps Tenodesis

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for SLAP Lesion

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of Alberta trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03189147.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing