18 and older, any sex, with Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis). Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of Participants Whose Propel Sinus Stent Appeared Worse, the Same, or Better Than the Bioabsorbable Nasal DressingPrimary· 12 months
Grading by a blinded independent sinus expert as to whether the propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is better, worse or the same, in terms of overall appearance after implant removal
propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is better
Adhesion/Scarring Scale - Left SideSecondary· 12 months
Average adhesion/scarring Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant placement - Left side
Adhesion/Scarring Scale - Right SideSecondary· 12 months
Average adhesion/scarring Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid placement
Polypoid Edema Scale - Left SideSecondary· 12 months
Average polypoid edema Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant placement
Polypoid Edema Scale - Right SideSecondary· 12 months
Average polypoid edema Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid placement
Number of Participants Whose Propel Sinus Stent Appeared Worse, the Same, or Better Than the Bioabsorbable Nasal DressingSecondary· 30 Days
Grading by a blinded independent sinus expert as to whether the propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is better, worse or the same, in terms of overall appearance after implant removal
propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is better
The purpose of this study is to compare how two different post-surgical treatments that both deliver steroids to the frontal sinus opening affect your healing after frontal sinus surgery.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
NCT06986629 — Effect of Photobiostimulation Versus Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on Quality of Life in Adults With Chronic Rhinosinusit
· NA
· recruiting
NCT05882903 — The Effect of Intra-sinus Application of Betamethasone Dipropionate Nasal Cream on Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT05857228 — Viral and Epigenetic Influences in CRSwNP
· active not recruiting
NCT07075965 — Calcium Channel Blocker in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT07423104 — A Study of Cladribine, Low Dose Cytarabine, and Venetoclax in Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory or Secondary Acute Myeloi
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT05744869 — SBAT for Health Equity
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06052956 — Efficacy of Methylene Blue Photodynamic Therapy for Treatment of Deep Tissue Abscesses
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07032636 — Reducing Crises and Suicide Within the Idaho Army National Guard
· NA
· not yet recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by University of Rochester
Last refreshed: 5 January 2023
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03188822.