Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03188822

Steroid Delivery to the Frontal Sinus Opening With a Bioabsorbable Implant vs. a Bioabsorbable Nasal Dressing

Terminated NA Results posted Last updated 5 January 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Bioabsorbable steroid releasing sinus implant in Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis) in 9 participants. Terminated before completion.

Timeline
25 August 2017
Primary endpoint
28 September 2021
2 November 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Rochester
PhaseNA
StatusTerminated
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment9
Start date25 August 2017
Primary completion28 September 2021
Estimated completion2 November 2021
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Rochester

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis). Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Number of Participants Whose Propel Sinus Stent Appeared Worse, the Same, or Better Than the Bioabsorbable Nasal Dressing Primary · 12 months

Grading by a blinded independent sinus expert as to whether the propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is better, worse or the same, in terms of overall appearance after implant removal

propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is better
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid0
propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is same
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid1
propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is worse
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid1
Adhesion/Scarring Scale - Left Side Secondary · 12 months

Average adhesion/scarring Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant placement - Left side

adhesion/scarring Likert scale score of 0
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid3
adhesion/scarring Likert scale score of 1
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid0
Adhesion/Scarring Scale - Right Side Secondary · 12 months

Average adhesion/scarring Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid placement

adhesion/scarring Likert scale score of 0
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid2
adhesion/scarring Likert scale score of 1
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid1
Polypoid Edema Scale - Left Side Secondary · 12 months

Average polypoid edema Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant placement

polypoid edema Likert score 0
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid0
polypoid edema Likert score 1
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid0
polypoid edema Likert score 2
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid0
polypoid edema Likert score 3
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid0
polypoid edema Likert score 4
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid3
Polypoid Edema Scale - Right Side Secondary · 12 months

Average polypoid edema Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid placement

polypoid edema Likert score 0
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid1
polypoid edema Likert score 1
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid0
polypoid edema Likert score 2
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid0
polypoid edema Likert score 3
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid0
polypoid edema Likert score 4
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid2
Frontal Sinus Opening Size Secondary · 12 months

Frontal sinus opening greater than or equal to 4 mm for bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant vs. bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid

Left
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid0
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid3
Right
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid1
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid2
Visualization of Frontal Sinus Roof Secondary · 12 months

Odds ratio of frontal sinus roof visualized for bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant vs. bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid

GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid0
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid2
Number of Participants Whose Propel Sinus Stent Appeared Worse, the Same, or Better Than the Bioabsorbable Nasal Dressing Secondary · 30 Days

Grading by a blinded independent sinus expert as to whether the propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is better, worse or the same, in terms of overall appearance after implant removal

propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is better
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid2
propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is same
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid3
propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is worse
GroupValue95% CI
Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Sinus Implant & Nasal Dressing Impregnated With Steroid3

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this study is to compare how two different post-surgical treatments that both deliver steroids to the frontal sinus opening affect your healing after frontal sinus surgery.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis)

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of Rochester trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03188822.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing