Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03181958

A Trial Comparing Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies in Preterm Infants Following Extubation

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 30 September 2021
What this trial tests

NA trial testing NHFOV in Intubated Infants Were Intend to Extubation Using Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies in 1,493 participants. Completed in 30 June 2021.

Timeline
1 December 2017
Primary endpoint
31 May 2021
30 June 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorDaping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment1,493
Start date1 December 2017
Primary completion31 May 2021
Estimated completion30 June 2021
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University

Who can join

Adults 30 Minutes to 1 Month, any sex, with Intubated Infants Were Intend to Extubation Using Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Primary · up to 8 weeks

the total days of the baby supported with the ventilator

GroupValue95% CI
NHFOV6.3± 6.0
NCPAP7.8± 7.2
NIPPV7.3± 9.2
Ventilator-free Days Primary · up to 8 weeks

non-invasive ventilation was need after extubation

GroupValue95% CI
NHFOV3417 – 52
NCPAP3220 – 45
NIPPV3521 – 52
Number of Babies With Reintubation Primary · up to 8 weeks

the total numbers of the baby supported with ventilator

GroupValue95% CI
NHFOV63
NCPAP123
NIPPV84
Number of Participants With Airleaks Secondary · up to 8 weeks

airleaks was diagnosed after extubation

GroupValue95% CI
NHFOV4
NCPAP3
NIPPV9
Number of Participants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia(BPD) Secondary · at gestational age of 36 weeks or at discharge

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia was defined, according to National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria, by the receipt of any form of positive-airway-pressure support or a requirement for supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks. A requirement for supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks was defined as an FiO2 of 0.30 or more or

GroupValue95% CI
NHFOV163
NCPAP184
NIPPV182
Number of Participants With Retinopathy of Prematurity> 2nd Stage Secondary · up to 8 weeks

Retinopathy of prematurity\> 2nd stage was diagnosed after extubation

GroupValue95% CI
NHFOV63
NCPAP74
NIPPV72
Number of Participants With Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis≥ 2nd Stage Secondary · up to 8 weeks

Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis≥ 2nd stage was diagnosed after extubation

GroupValue95% CI
NHFOV33
NCPAP24
NIPPV36
Number of Participants With Intraventricular Hemorrhage>2nd Grade Secondary · up to 8 weeks

Intraventricular hemorrhage\>2nd grade was diagnosed after extubation

GroupValue95% CI
NHFOV48
NCPAP63
NIPPV59
Number of Participants With Need for Postnatal Steroids Secondary · up to 8 weeks

steroids was used for chronic lung disease

GroupValue95% CI
NHFOV63
NCPAP77
NIPPV98
In-hospital Mortality Secondary · up to 8 weeks

the baby died in hospital

GroupValue95% CI
NHFOV8
NCPAP5
NIPPV4
Composite Mortality/BPD Secondary · up to 8 weeks

the baby was dead or diagnosed with BPD.

GroupValue95% CI
NHFOV171
NCPAP189
NIPPV186
Weekly Weight Gain Secondary · during hospitalization for the first 4 weeks of life or until NICU discharge whichever came first, an average of 1 month

Weekly weight gain (in grams/day) for the first 4 weeks of life or until NICU discharge, whichever comes first

GroupValue95% CI
NHFOV13.0± 5.3
NCPAP12.1± 4.9
NIPPV12.4± 6.4

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: up to 8 weeks. Reporting threshold: 4%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

NHFOV
Serious: 0/480 (0%)
Deaths: 8/480
NCPAP
Serious: 0/480 (0%)
Deaths: 5/480
NIPPV
Serious: 0/480 (0%)
Deaths: 4/480
Other adverse events (1 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemNHFOVNCPAPNIPPV
Nasal skin injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03181958 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the main cause of respiratory failure in preterm neonates, its incidence varying from 80% to 25% depending on gestational age.When optimal prenatal care is provided, the best approach to treat RDS, according to several recent trials,consists in providing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) from the first minutes of life using short binasal prongs or masks, followed by early selective surfactant administration for babies with worsening oxygenation and/or increasing work of breathing. Any effort should be done to minimize the time under invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).Nonetheless, clinical trials have shown that a relevant proportion of preterm neonates fails this approach and eventually need IMV.The duration of IMV is a well known risk factor for the development of broncho-pulmonary dysplasia (BPD) - a condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. To minimize the duration of IMV, various non invasive respiratory support modalities are available in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). CPAP is presently the most common technique used in this regard. However, a systematic review has shown that non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) reduces the need for IMV (within one week from extubation) more effectively than NCPAP, although it is not clear if NIPPV may reduce need for intubation longterm and it seems to have no effect on BPD and mortality. NIPPV main drawback is the lack of synchronization, which is difficult to be accurately achieved and is usually unavailable. A more recent alternative technique is non-invasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) which consists on the application of a bias flow generating a continuous distending positive pressure with oscillations superimposed on spontaneous tidal breathing with no need for synchronization. The physiological, biological and clinical details about NHFOV have been described elsewhere. To date, there is only one small observational uncontrolled study about the use of NHFOV after extubation in preterm infants. Other relatively small case series or retrospective cohort studies suggested safety, feasibility and possible usefulness of NHFOV and have been reviewed elsewhere.The only randomized trial published so far compared NHFOV to biphasic CPAP,in babies failing CPAP and it has been criticized for methodological flaws and for not taking into account respiratory physiology.An European survey showed that, despite the absence of large randomized clinical trials, NHFOV is quite widely used, at least in some Countries and no major side effects are reported, although large data about NHFOV safety are lacking. This may be due to the relative NHFOV easiness of use but evidence-based and physiology-driven data are warranted about this technique.

Publications & conference data

6 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Postextubation Support for Preterm Neonates in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Zhu X, Qi H, Feng Z, Shi Y, et al · · 2022 · cited 47× · PMID 35467744 · DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0710
  2. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation as respiratory support in preterm infants: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Li J, Li X, Huang X, Zhang Z. · · 2019 · cited 38× · PMID 30876411 · DOI 10.1186/s12931-019-1023-0
  3. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) vs noninvasive high frequency oscillation ventilation (NHFOV) as post-extubation support in preterm neonates: protocol for an assessor-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
    Shi Y, De Luca D, NASal OscillatioN post-Extubation (NASONE) study group. · · 2019 · cited 22× · PMID 31349833 · DOI 10.1186/s12887-019-1625-1
  4. Effectiveness of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation vs Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation as Support After Extubation of Neonates Born Extremely Preterm or With More Severe Respiratory Failure: A Secondary
    Zhu X, Li F, Shi Y, Feng Z, et al · · 2023 · cited 14× · PMID 37399009 · DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21644
  5. Non-invasive high-frequency ventilation in newborn infants with respiratory distress.
    Abdel-Latif ME, Tan O, Fiander M, Osborn DA. · · 2024 · cited 11× · PMID 38695628 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012712.pub2
  6. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillation ventilation as post- extubation respiratory support in neonates: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Prasad R, Saha B, Sk MH, Sahoo JP, et al · · 2024 · cited 3× · PMID 39078848 · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0307903

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of NHFOV

Trials testing the same drug.

Other Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03181958.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing