18 and older, any sex, with Opiate Addiction. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Buprenorphine EngagementPrimary· 30 days after randomization
Buprenorphine engagement was defined as the number of participants having an active buprenorphine prescription at 30 days after randomization. Responses were tallied using a dichotomous (i.e., Yes/No) measure. Data are summarized by study arm.
Group
Value
95% CI
O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)
19
Enhanced Referral
19
Treatment RetentionSecondary· 6 months
Treatment retention was assessed by the number/percentage of participants who had a medical visit AND active buprenorphine prescription each month after buprenorphine initiation for 6 months. Results are summarized by study arm.
Group
Value
95% CI
O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)
2
Enhanced Referral
6
HIV Risk BehaviorsSecondary· 6 months
Change in HIV risk behaviors will be assessed using the HIV risk behavior survey. This survey, consisting of a dichotomous (yes/no) measure of injection risk, will be used based on self-report of at least one risk behavior (sharing syringes, not using bleach to clean syringes, sharing cookers, or front/back loading of syringes) reported during the interval. The number of participants demonstrating at least one risk behavior is during the 6 month interval is summarized by study arm.
Group
Value
95% CI
O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)
5
Enhanced Referral
4
Buprenorphine DiversionSecondary· 6 months
Buprenorphine diversion will be defined as having at least one problem behavior: non-adherence to prescribed medication on electronic monitoring, self-reported diversion, or a urine sample consistent with diversion during the 6 month interval. This outcome measure is used to determine how many participants sell or give away prescribed medication. The number of participants with at least one problem behavior is summarized by study arm.
Group
Value
95% CI
O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)
8
Enhanced Referral
2
Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER)Secondary· 6 months
The ICER will be calculated by dividing the incremental mean cost of the O-BMT arm relative to the control arm by the incremental mean effectiveness of the O-BMT arm relative to the control arm. The primary economic effectiveness outcome will be the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), a measure that incorporates both duration and health-related quality-of-life and is recommended as the primary economic effectiveness measure. ICER is a composite measure that incorporates QALYs (also reported as a separate outcome measure) and mean costs (also reported as a separate outcome measure).
The main economic effectiveness outcome will be the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), a measure that incorporates both duration and health-related quality-of-life and is recommended as the primary economic effectiveness measure. Mean years gained are summarized by study arm.
Group
Value
95% CI
O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)
0.20
0.18 – 0.21
Enhanced Referral
0.17
0.15 – 0.19
Mean Difference in Total CostsSecondary· 6 months
Mean cost (in US dollars) of the O-BMT arm were compared to the control arm. The resource utilization and resulting cost of implementing and administering the O-BMT intervention were estimated using microcosting analysis and participant self-report. Mean costs (in US dollars) are summarized by study arm.
Group
Value
95% CI
O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)
2702.43
1280.77 – 6825.75
Enhanced Referral
26853.97
7001.37 – 146995.55
Time to First Buprenorphine PrescriptionSecondary· 1 month
Time to first buprenorphine prescription is defined as the amount of time, in days, from when a participant enrolled in the study to receipt of first buprenorphine prescription. Results are summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Group
Value
95% CI
O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)
3.0
± 4.6
Enhanced Referral
14.0
± 20.9
Number/Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Buprenorphine PrescriptionSecondary· 6 months
The Number/percentage of participants who received any buprenorphine prescription is defined as the number/percentage of participants that filled at least one prescription for buprenorphine while enrolled in the study. Results are summarized by study arm.
Group
Value
95% CI
O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)
36
Enhanced Referral
29
Total Time Prescribed BuprenorphineSecondary· 6 months
Total time prescribed buprenorphine is defined as the amount of time in days that participants were prescribed buprenorphine during the study period. Results are summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
Group
Value
95% CI
O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)
46.7
± 32.9
Enhanced Referral
56.6
± 34.8
Buprenorphine Adherence (Self-reported)Secondary· 30 days after randomization
Buprenorphine Adherence (self-reported), defined as meeting the primary outcome of buprenorphine engagement and self-reporting buprenorphine use at 30 days, was assessed as a composite measure for sensitivity analysis. The number of participants who both maintained an active buprenorphine prescription at 30 days after randomization, based on a dichotomous (i.e., Yes/No) measure, AND self-reported having taken buprenorphine on 1 or more days during the 30-day period were tabulated. Data are summarized by study arm.
Group
Value
95% CI
O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)
13
Enhanced Referral
13
Buprenorphine Adherence (Confirmed)Secondary· 30 days after randomization
Buprenorphine Adherence (confirmed) was defined as meeting the primary outcome and having a urine drug screen positive for buprenorphine at 30 days. This outcome was assessed as a composite measure for sensitivity analysis. The number of participants who both maintained an active buprenorphine prescription at 30 days after randomization, based on a dichotomous (i.e., Yes/No) measure, AND tested positive for Buprenorphine in their urine sample following the 30-day period were tabulated. Data are summarized by study arm.
Group
Value
95% CI
O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)
5
Enhanced Referral
8
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: 24 weeks.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
This trial will recruit syringe exchange participants with opioid use disorder in New York City and test whether starting buprenorphine treatment at the syringe exchange program is more effective than referral to a community health center for buprenorphine treatment.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07224061 — Promoting Asthma Management Guidelines With Technology-Based Intervention and Care Coordination in Clinics and Schools
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06775886 — Effect of Personalized Accelerated Pacing in Symptomatic Patients With Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
· NA
· terminated
NCT06919094 — A Virtual Life Story Club Intervention to Improve Loneliness and Apathy in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07076069 — The Effect of Multimodal Pain Regimen on Use of Narcotics After Rotator Cuff Tear Repair
· Phase 4
· recruiting
NCT07037940 — Physician Response Evaluation With Contextual Insights vs. Standard Engines - Artificial Intelligence RAG vs LLM Clinica
· NA
· completed
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Montefiore Medical Center
Last refreshed: 11 December 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03150173.