14 and older, any sex, with Malocclusion. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Successful Correction of MalocclusionPrimary· The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Achievement of target setup per treatment plan as determined by Orthodontist.
Group
Value
95% CI
3M Clear Aligner
32
3M Clear Aligner
20
Treatment Time for Tooth MovementSecondary· The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Achievement of individual tooth movement measured per treatment plan
Group
Value
95% CI
3M Clear Aligner
443
14 – 853
Effective Use of AttachmentsSecondary· The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Effective use of attachment by tracking attachment bond failures by visual assessment
Group
Value
95% CI
3M Clear Aligner
5.4
± 14.58
Orthodontist SatisfactionSecondary· The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Orthodontist satisfaction with treatment outcome
Group
Value
95% CI
3M Clear Aligner
5
3M Clear Aligner
33
3M Clear Aligner
7
3M Clear Aligner
2
Aligner ComfortSecondary· The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Aligner comfortable to wear
Group
Value
95% CI
3M Clear Aligner
24
3M Clear Aligner
390
3M Clear Aligner
41
3M Clear Aligner
22
Appearance SatisfactionSecondary· The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Subject satisfaction with appearance during treatment
Group
Value
95% CI
3M Clear Aligner
470
3M Clear Aligner
9
Aligner Ease of CleaningSecondary· The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Subject satisfaction with ease of cleaning during treatment
Group
Value
95% CI
3M Clear Aligner
436
3M Clear Aligner
43
Ease of InsertionSecondary· The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Subject satisfaction with treatment; specifically aligners easy to insert
Group
Value
95% CI
3M Clear Aligner
364
3M Clear Aligner
97
3M Clear Aligner
15
3M Clear Aligner
3
Mid Course Corrections/Refinements NeededSecondary· The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Number of mid course refinements or corrections
Group
Value
95% CI
3M Clear Aligner
21
3M Clear Aligner
19
3M Clear Aligner
8
3M Clear Aligner
4
Ease of Aligner RemovalSecondary· The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Subject satisfaction with treatment; specifically with aligner removal
Group
Value
95% CI
3M Clear Aligner
308
3M Clear Aligner
136
3M Clear Aligner
32
3M Clear Aligner
3
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Up to 28 months.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Clear Aligners to correct tooth malocclusions with the use of attachments and/or buttons, as determined by the amount of teeth movement and overall achievement goals of the treatment plan.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
NCT06792513 — The Effectiveness of Acrylic and Clear Aligners in the Treatment of Anterior Crossbite in Children
· NA
· completed
Other recruiting trials for Malocclusion
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT05684510 — Treatment of Mild Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Multibracket Therapy
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07290790 — A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Investigation Evaluating the Accuracy of the Trimline Design When Treated With SureSm
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06858670 — Effectiveness of Auxiliary Segmental Lingual Appliances in Leveling the Curve of Wilson at Second Molars
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06536335 — Evaluation of the Perceived Experience of Patients Treated With Aligners With Two Different Timings
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07094581 — Evaluation of the Effect of Adenoid Hypertrophy on the Masseter Muscle in Children: A Comparative Ultrasonographic Study
· recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Solventum Orthodontics Corporation
Last refreshed: 2 December 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03141788.