Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03137082

Guanfacine to Reduce Relapse Risk in Women With Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)

Completed Phase 1, PHASE2 Results posted Last updated 5 June 2024
What this trial tests

Phase 1, PHASE2 trial testing Guanfacine XR 3mgs/daily in Alcohol Abstinence in 32 participants. Completed in 31 March 2021.

Timeline
12 July 2017
Primary endpoint
31 March 2021
31 March 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorStony Brook University
PhasePhase 1, PHASE2
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingtriple
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment32
Start date12 July 2017
Primary completion31 March 2021
Estimated completion31 March 2021
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Stony Brook University

Who can join

Adults 18 to 50, female only, with Alcohol Abstinence. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Percentage of Days Abstinent Primary · 12 weeks

Percentage of days abstinent across the 12-week trial was calculated using the Timeline follow Back.

GroupValue95% CI
Guanfacine XR 3mgs/Daily74.7± 27.4
Placebo (for Guanfacine)50.6± 26.5
Percentage of Heavy Drinking Days Primary · 12 weeks

Percentage of heavy drinking days across the 12-week trial was calculated using the Timeline follow Back.

GroupValue95% CI
Guanfacine XR 3mgs/Daily15.5± 26.7
Placebo (for Guanfacine)30.6± 26.7
Alcohol Consumption (Percentage of Negative Urines) Primary · 12 weeks

Urine screening will be conducted twice per week across the trial.

GroupValue95% CI
Guanfacine XR 3mgs/Daily45.3± 35.7
Placebo (for Guanfacine)35.2± 19.4
Mood (Anxiety) Secondary · 2 times per week for 12 weeks

The Anxiety subscale of the Profile of Mood States (POMS) was administered to assess anxiety. The subscale comprises 9 adjectives that describe anxiety-related feelings, and participants are required to rate the extent to which they are experiencing each feeling at that moment, from 0= not at all; 1= a little; 2= moderately; 3= quite a bit; 4= extremely. Possible scores range from 0 to 36, with higher scores representing higher levels of anxiety. Anxiety ratings were collected two times per week across twelve weeks (24 time-points). Each time-point represented change from baseline anxiety. The

GroupValue95% CI
Guanfacine XR 3mgs/Daily-8.2± 8.2
Placebo (for Guanfacine)-0.75± 4.7
Mood (Depression) Secondary · 2 times per week for 12 weeks

The Depression subscale of the Profile of Mood States (POMS) was administered to assess depression. The subscale comprises 15 adjectives that describe depression-related feelings, and participants are required to rate the extent to which they are experiencing each feeling at that moment, from 0= not at all; 1= a little; 2= moderately; 3= quite a bit; 4= extremely. Possible scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores representing higher levels of depression. Depression ratings were collected two times per week across twelve weeks (24 time-points). Each time-point represented change from basel

GroupValue95% CI
Guanfacine XR 3mgs/Daily-13.9± 13.3
Placebo (for Guanfacine)0.03± 5.2
Alcohol Craving Secondary · 12-weeks

The desire for using alcohol was assessed using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) in which 1 = 'not at all' and 10 = 'extremely high'. Alcohol craving ratings were collected two times per week across twelve weeks (24 time-points). Each time-point represented change from baseline alcohol craving. The calculation here represents mean change from baseline values across the 12 weeks, where minus scores represent lower mean alcohol craving compared with baseline.

GroupValue95% CI
Guanfacine XR 3mgs/Daily-1.6± 1.4
Placebo (for Guanfacine)-1.9± 3.4
Emotion Regulation (Difficulties in Impulse Control) Secondary · 12-weeks

We used the Impulse Control Difficulties subscale (IMPULSE) of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) to assess changes in impulse control across the trial. The DERS was administered two times per week, and the IMPULSE subscale comprised 6 items with a potential score range of 6 to 30 with higher scores representing greater difficulties in impulse control. Each time-point represents change from baseline impulse control difficulties. The calculation here represents mean change from baseline values across the 12 weeks, where minus values represent less difficulties in impulse contro

GroupValue95% CI
Guanfacine XR 3mgs/Daily-2.8± 2.4
Placebo (for Guanfacine)0.85± 3.2
Emotion Regulation (Difficulties With Engaging in Goal Related Behavior) Secondary · 12-week

We used the Difficulties in Engaging in Goal-Directed Behavior (GOALS) subscale of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) to assess changes in goal-directed behavior across the trial. The DERS was administered two times per week (24 time-points) and the GOALS subscale comprised 5 items with a potential score range of 5 to 25 with higher scores representing greater difficulties in engaging in goal-directed behavior. Each time-point represented change from baseline GOALS. The calculation here represents mean change from baseline values across the 12 weeks, where minus values represe

GroupValue95% CI
Guanfacine XR 3mgs/Daily-3.0± 3.6
Placebo (for Guanfacine)0.95± 2.2
Emotion Regulation (Difficulties With Emotional Clarity) Secondary · 12-weeks

We used the Lack of Emotional Clarity subscale (CLARITY) of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) to assess changes in emotional clarity across the trial. The DERS was administered two times per week, and the CLARITY subscale comprised 5 items with a potential score range of 5 to 25 with higher scores representing greater difficulties in emotional clarity. Each time-point represents change from baseline difficulties in emotional clarity. The calculation here represents mean change from baseline values across the 12 weeks, where minus values represent less difficulties in emotiona

GroupValue95% CI
Guanfacine XR 3mgs/Daily-2.3± 2.8
Placebo (for Guanfacine)-0.71± 2.3
Emotion Regulation (Limited Access to Emotion Regulation Strategies) Secondary · 12-weeks

We used the Limited Access to Emotion Regulation Strategies subscale (STRATEGIES) of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) to assess changes in ability to access emotion regulation strategies across the trial. The DERS was administered two times per week, and the STRATEGIES subscale comprised 8 items with a potential score range of 8 to 40 with higher scores representing greater difficulties in accessing emotion regulation strategies. Each time-point represents change from baseline STRATEGIES. The calculation here represents mean change from baseline values across the 12 weeks, w

GroupValue95% CI
Guanfacine XR 3mgs/Daily-5.1± 5.4
Placebo (for Guanfacine)-0.28± 5.4
Emotion Regulation (Difficulties With Emotional Awareness) Secondary · 12-weeks

We used the Lack of Emotional Awareness subscale (AWARENESS) of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) to assess changes in emotional awareness across the trial. The DERS was administered two times per week, and the AWARENESS subscale comprised of 6 items with a potential score range of 6 to 30 with higher scores representing greater a greater lack of emotional awareness. Each time-point represents change from baseline emotional awareness. The calculation here represents mean change from baseline values across the 12 weeks, where minus values represent less difficulties in emotion

GroupValue95% CI
Guanfacine XR 3mgs/Daily-1.6± 4.3
Placebo (for Guanfacine)-2.9± 5.1
Emotion Regulation (Non-Acceptance of Emotional Responses) Secondary · 12-Week

We used the Non-Acceptance of Emotional Responses subscale (NON-ACCEPTANCE) of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) to assess changes in non-acceptance of emotional responses across the trial. The DERS was administered two times per week, and the NON-ACCEPTANCE subscale comprised 6 items with a potential score range of 6 to 30 with higher scores representing greater difficulties in acceptance of emotional response. Each time-point represents change from baseline NON-ACCEPTANCE. The calculation here represents mean change from baseline values across the 12 weeks, where minus valu

GroupValue95% CI
Guanfacine XR 3mgs/Daily-6.4± 5.7
Placebo (for Guanfacine)-0.88± 6.6

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: 12-weeks. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Guanfacine XR 3mgs/Daily
Serious: 1/8 (13%)
Deaths: 0/8
Placebo (for Guanfacine)
Serious: 0/7 (0%)
Deaths: 0/7

Serious adverse events (1 terms)

ReactionSystemGuanfacine XR 3mgs/DailyPlacebo (for Guanfacine)
Pelvic PainReproductive system and breast disorders
Other adverse events (12 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemGuanfacine XR 3mgs/DailyPlacebo (for Guanfacine)
HeadachesGeneral disorders
Upset StomachGeneral disorders
Dry MouthGeneral disorders
DizzinessGeneral disorders
ShakinessGeneral disorders
Weight GainGeneral disorders
Appetite LossGeneral disorders
NightmaresGeneral disorders
EnuresisGeneral disorders
ItchinessGeneral disorders
DehydrationGeneral disorders
Urinary Tract InfectionGeneral disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Pelvic Pain.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03137082 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

Guanfacine may preferentially reduce craving and improve cognitive control in women with Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), compared to men. As these behaviors are related to relapse, the objectives of this study are to conduct a 10-week out-patient clinical trial to examine the effects of Guanfacine Extended Release (XR; 3mgs) versus placebo on drinking measures in women with AUD.

Publications & conference data

7 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Noradrenergic targets for the treatment of alcohol use disorder.
    Haass-Koffler CL, Swift RM, Leggio L. · · 2018 · cited 61× · PMID 29460163 · DOI 10.1007/s00213-018-4843-6
  2. The Corticotropin Releasing Factor Receptor 1 in Alcohol Use Disorder: Still a Valid Drug Target?
    Pomrenze MB, Fetterly TL, Winder DG, Messing RO. · · 2017 · cited 48× · PMID 28940382 · DOI 10.1111/acer.13507
  3. Noradrenergic circuits and signaling in substance use disorders.
    Downs AM, McElligott ZA. · · 2022 · cited 36× · PMID 35176286 · DOI 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.108997
  4. Noradrenergic Mechanisms and Circuitry of Hyperkatifeia in Alcohol Use Disorder.
    Varodayan FP, Erikson CM, Scroger MV, Roberto M. · · 2025 · cited 9× · PMID 39304172 · DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.09.009
  5. Orphan peptide and G protein-coupled receptor signalling in alcohol use disorder.
    Anversa RG, Maddern XJ, Lawrence AJ, Walker LC. · · 2024 · cited 4× · PMID 38073127 · DOI 10.1111/bph.16301
  6. Alpha-2 Adrenergic Agonists Reduce Heavy Alcohol Drinking and Improve Cognitive Performance in Mice.
    Quadir SG, Lepeak L, Miracle S, Collu R, et al · · 2026 · cited 1× · PMID 41513468 · DOI 10.1523/eneuro.0368-25.2026
  7. Decoding the bidirectional links between alcohol misuse and aggression: toward a unified translational framework.
    Russell NM, Frier MD, Bortolato M, Mangieri RA. · · 2026 · PMID 41171339 · DOI 10.1007/s00213-025-06938-0

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Alcohol Abstinence

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Stony Brook University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03137082.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing