Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03111836

Effectiveness of User and Expert Driven Internet-based Lifestyle Interventions on Hypertension Control

Completed NA Last updated 13 April 2017
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Control Group in Hypertension in 129 participants. Completed in 1 June 2015.

Timeline
1 June 2012
Primary endpoint
1 July 2014
1 June 2015

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Toronto
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposeprevention
Enrollment129
Start date1 June 2012
Primary completion1 July 2014
Estimated completion1 June 2015

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Toronto

Who can join

Adults 35 to 74, any sex, with Hypertension. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. Lifestyle counseling is recommended as a first line therapy for reducing blood pressure (BP) and risk for cardiovascular events. Recent studies suggest that e-based lifestyle interventions are effective in evoking therapeutic change in BP1. However, BP response and adherence to exercise and diet behavior varies significantly after e-based interventions due to variations in treatment methodologies. Consensus is not yet established for a standardized e-counseling protocol for hypertension. As noted in our systematic review, the two dominant models of e-counseling procedures are expert-driven (protocol driven, prescriptive) and user-driven (self-guided, collaborative). Expert-driven programs prescribe specific changes for lifestyle behavior which are intended to facilitate compliance to behavioral change. In contrast, the user-driven method actively involves the subject in goal-setting and/or the selection of the intervention used to reach the behavioral goal. One conclusion from the systematic review is that these models are used indiscriminately in e-counseling programs. There is currently inadequate data to determine the efficacy of programs that are expert-driven vs. user-driven in reducing BP while modifying lifestyle behaviour. It is possible that a combination of expert-driven and user-driven features for lifestyle e-counseling is most effective. However, before these two approaches can be combined, it is essential to establish the strengths and limitations of each model.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Effectiveness of User- and Expert-Driven Web-based Hypertension Programs: an RCT.
    Liu S, Brooks D, Thomas SG, Eysenbach G, et al · · 2018 · cited 41× · PMID 29456025 · DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.009

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Control Group

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Hypertension

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of Toronto trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03111836.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing