Evaluate the effect of a rapid turnaround CT/NG test compared to standard of care on antibiotic prescription for female patients with STI.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid Turnaround Test | 4 | |
| Usual Care | 10 |
Last reviewed · How we verify
Use of a Rapid Test for Gonorrhea & Chlamydia for Women Presenting With Possible Sexually Transmitted Infections
NA trial testing Cepheid Xpert CT/NG Rapid Turnaround Test in Sexually Transmitted Infection in 64 participants. Terminated before completion.
| Lead sponsor | University of Maryland, Baltimore |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Terminated |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | triple |
| Primary purpose | diagnostic |
| Enrollment | 64 |
| Start date | 24 September 2018 |
| Primary completion | 25 March 2022 |
| Estimated completion | 20 June 2023 |
| Sites | 1 location across United States |
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Adults 18 to 65, female only, with Sexually Transmitted Infection or Gonorrhea Female. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Evaluate the effect of a rapid turnaround CT/NG test compared to standard of care on antibiotic prescription for female patients with STI.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid Turnaround Test | 4 | |
| Usual Care | 10 |
Evaluate the effect of utilizing a rapid turnaround CT/NG test on length of stay (minutes) in the Emergency Department.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid Turnaround Test | 200.6896552 | ± 48.12936692 |
| Usual Care | 129.6060606 | ± 60.9717862 |
Compare the congruence of test results between the rapid turnaround CT/NG test with the usual care test (send out PCR) in subjects that have both performed (Experimental Group).
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects Who Received Both RTAT and Usual Care Tests | 92.307 |
Evaluate patient satisfaction with provider's explanations for the 2 diagnostic groups. Patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with their provider's explanations on a five point scale, with 0 being "not at all satisfied" and 4 being "very satisfied."
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid Turnaround Test | 3.346153846 | ± 0.745241314 |
| Usual Care | 3.24137931 | ± 0.872401137 |
Evaluate patient satisfaction with treatment effectiveness for the 2 diagnostic groups. Patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with their treatment effectiveness on a five point scale, with 0 being "not at all satisfied" and 4 being "very satisfied."
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid Turnaround Test | 3.153846154 | ± 0.731699812 |
| Usual Care | 3.206896552 | ± 0.726012118 |
Evaluate patient satisfaction with overall experience during visit for the 2 diagnostic groups. Patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with their wait times on a five point scale, with 0 being "not at all satisfied" and 4 being "very satisfied."
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid Turnaround Test | 3.346153846 | ± 0.561591146 |
| Usual Care | 3.275862069 | ± 0.797162455 |
Compare need for additional healthcare utilization between the groups.
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid Turnaround Test | 4 | |
| Usual Care | 1 |
Evaluate patient satisfaction with wait times during visit for the 2 diagnostic groups. Patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with their wait times on a five point scale, with 0 being "not at all satisfied" and 4 being "very satisfied."
| Group | Value | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid Turnaround Test | 3.038461538 | ± 0.999230473 |
| Usual Care | 2.931034483 | ± 0.923155864 |
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of utilizing a rapid turnaround CT/NG test on treatment of female patients in the emergency department or urgent care setting with possible STIs.
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
Verify or expand the search:
Currently open trials in the same condition.
Trials by the same sponsor.
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03098394.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing