Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03094962

Development of a Musculoskeletal Model of the PIP Joint

Completed NA Last updated 15 November 2018
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Motion capture in Patient Specific Computational Modeling in 10 participants. Completed in 5 September 2017.

Timeline
21 January 2015
Primary endpoint
5 September 2017
5 September 2017

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Southampton
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposebasic science
Enrollment10
Start date21 January 2015
Primary completion5 September 2017
Estimated completion5 September 2017
Sites1 location across United Kingdom

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Southampton

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Patient Specific Computational Modeling. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint is the second joint in the finger from the finger tip. The outcome following replacement surgery of this joint is considered unsatisfactory. In order to improve these outcomes, it would be helpful to understand the geometry of the joint, how it moves and the forces that are involved. This can be achieved using computer models that model the bones and the soft tissues - musculoskeletal models. In order to make these models as representative as possible, they should be generated using anatomical data. Data will initially be extracted from patients' existing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans. This will enable the computer model to begin being constructed. In parallel to the model initialisation, anatomical and motion data of the PIP joint of healthy volunteers will be collected. The necessary data will be collected using CT and MRI scans, as well as optical motion tracking methods. These data will then be used to populate the musculoskeletal model. Once the model is constructed, it will be used to simulate the motion of the joint and look at the effect of a simulated PIP joint replacement. This information should then provide insight as to how PIP joint replacements might be improved in future.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Quantifying Soft Tissue Artefacts and Imaging Variability in Motion Capture of the Fingers.
    Metcalf CD, Phillips C, Forrester A, Glodowski J, et al · · 2020 · cited 12× · PMID 32076882 · DOI 10.1007/s10439-020-02476-2

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Motion capture

Trials testing the same drug.

Other University of Southampton trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03094962.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing