Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03086018

A Comparative, Controlled, Clinical Investigation and Quality Control of a New Hearing Aid

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 6 November 2019
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Successor hearing aid to Juna in Hearing Loss in 30 participants. Completed in 28 June 2017.

Timeline
13 March 2017
Primary endpoint
28 June 2017
28 June 2017

Quick facts

Lead sponsorBernafon AG
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment30
Start date13 March 2017
Primary completion28 June 2017
Estimated completion28 June 2017
Sites1 location across Switzerland

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Bernafon AG

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Hearing Loss. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Speech Intelligibility Performance Primary · 2 hour period of speech testing during a lab appointment after wearing the devices for approximately 2 weeks.

Speech test scores will be measured with speech reception thresholds (SRTs) of speech in noise in three conditions: unaided, aided with the current device, and aided with the new device. The score is measured by the the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which 50% of words in a sentence list are correctly repeated. The speech is always presented at 65 dB and the background noise varies to maintain the 50% correct. A lower SNR score indicates a better score. The maximum score will be 15 dB and the minimum will be -5 dB.

Unaided
GroupValue95% CI
Successor Hearing Aid to Juna-1.25± 1.45
Aided with current device
GroupValue95% CI
Successor Hearing Aid to Juna-3.89± 0.99
Adided with new device
GroupValue95% CI
Successor Hearing Aid to Juna-5.22± 1.09
Subjective Performance of Aided Benefit Secondary · A 2 week time period during which they will wear the devices and answer questionnaires about the experience.

The subjective performance for the new device will be measured with the APHAB questionnaire (Abbreviated Hearing Aid Benefit Profile). The questionnaire is a list of 24 statement that the subjects must agree or disagree with using a scale of units from A to G (A being Always and G being Never). Each letter has a corresponding score used for the calculation: A receives 99, B receives 87, C receives 75, D receives 50, E receives 25, F recevies 12, and G receives 1. An average for each subscale is calculated, and a global or overall score can be calculated by taking the mean of the three positiv

Ease of Communication
GroupValue95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna37.38± 24.11
Background Noise
GroupValue95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna44.29± 16.89
Reverberation
GroupValue95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna42.08± 23.96
Aversiveness
GroupValue95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna-17.63± 26.14
Global Score
GroupValue95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna40.30± 20.49
Speech Intelligibility Performance With New Feature Secondary · 2 hour period of speech testing during a lab appointment after wearing the devices for approximately 2 weeks.

Word recognition test scores will be measured with two signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels in percent correct in two conditions, with the new feature on and the new feature off. The test is a speech test with the words stated in noise at either a 5 dB SNR or a 15 dB SNR. The subject is presented with 5 rhyming words and must choose which word they heard. It is a forced choice meaning that the test will not continue with the next word until they've made a selection. They cannot leave any blank and are not penalized for wrong answers. The score is a percentage of words correct with the maximum s

+5 SNR WAKO Feature on
GroupValue95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna73.5± 5.2
+5 SNR WAKO Feature off
GroupValue95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna73.7± 4.95
+15 SNR WAKO Feature on
GroupValue95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna87.27± 4.08
+15 SNR WAKO Feature off
GroupValue95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna88.1± 4.63
Handling/Usability Performance Secondary · 2 hour period of usability testing with tasks and questionnaires.

The usability of the new device will be measured with a 3-point rating scale used by the tester to evaluate tasks performed by the end user as well as questionnaires and interviews. The questionnaire asks subjects to perform tasks, and the clinician rates the ease with which they complete the tasks. 2 is the highest score meaning that they could complete without help, 1 means that they required some assistance, and 0 means that they could not complete the task. A higher score means a better outcome.

GroupValue95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna97
Events Secondary · A 2 hour period of interviews and questionnaires after having worn the devices for approximately 2 weeks and keeping a diary to make notes of device behavior.

Events will be measured by the reporting of unexpected sounds or behavior of the device through questionnaires, diaries, and interviews. The number of events reported including AEs related to the device will be used to measure the outcome. Less events is a better outcome.

GroupValue95% CI
Experimental: Succssor Hearing Aid to Juna4

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: 4 months. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
Serious: 1/30 (3%)
Deaths: 0

Serious adverse events (1 terms)

ReactionSystemExperimental: Successor He…
Hospitalization due to accidentSocial circumstances
Other adverse events (12 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemExperimental: Successor He…
ColdGeneral disorders
Tore MeniscusGeneral disorders
Scratch on ear canalGeneral disorders
Dome in EarProduct Issues
HeadacheGeneral disorders
Irritation in earGeneral disorders
Sore ConchaProduct Issues
Back PainGeneral disorders
Pressure pointGeneral disorders
Tore Groin muscleGeneral disorders
Leg problemGeneral disorders
Face SwellingGeneral disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Hospitalization due to accident.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03086018 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of the hearing aid under laboratory as well as everyday conditions. In addition, the performance data of the hearing aid are compared with a Bernafon hearing aid already available on the market. The hearing aids are adapted according to the user requirements. The data collected in the study is intended to show that the benefit of the hearing aid being examined is identical or better than the current CE-marked hearing aid. A further aim is to improve the adaptation of the hearing device in such a way that the benefit for people with hearing impairments can be increased.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Hearing Loss

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Bernafon AG trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03086018.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing