18 and older, any sex, with Hearing Loss. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Speech Intelligibility PerformancePrimary· 2 hour period of speech testing during a lab appointment after wearing the devices for approximately 2 weeks.
Speech test scores will be measured with speech reception thresholds (SRTs) of speech in noise in three conditions: unaided, aided with the current device, and aided with the new device. The score is measured by the the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which 50% of words in a sentence list are correctly repeated. The speech is always presented at 65 dB and the background noise varies to maintain the 50% correct. A lower SNR score indicates a better score. The maximum score will be 15 dB and the minimum will be -5 dB.
Unaided
Group
Value
95% CI
Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
-1.25
± 1.45
Aided with current device
Group
Value
95% CI
Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
-3.89
± 0.99
Adided with new device
Group
Value
95% CI
Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
-5.22
± 1.09
Subjective Performance of Aided BenefitSecondary· A 2 week time period during which they will wear the devices and answer questionnaires about the experience.
The subjective performance for the new device will be measured with the APHAB questionnaire (Abbreviated Hearing Aid Benefit Profile). The questionnaire is a list of 24 statement that the subjects must agree or disagree with using a scale of units from A to G (A being Always and G being Never). Each letter has a corresponding score used for the calculation: A receives 99, B receives 87, C receives 75, D receives 50, E receives 25, F recevies 12, and G receives 1.
An average for each subscale is calculated, and a global or overall score can be calculated by taking the mean of the three positiv
Ease of Communication
Group
Value
95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
37.38
± 24.11
Background Noise
Group
Value
95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
44.29
± 16.89
Reverberation
Group
Value
95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
42.08
± 23.96
Aversiveness
Group
Value
95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
-17.63
± 26.14
Global Score
Group
Value
95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
40.30
± 20.49
Speech Intelligibility Performance With New FeatureSecondary· 2 hour period of speech testing during a lab appointment after wearing the devices for approximately 2 weeks.
Word recognition test scores will be measured with two signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels in percent correct in two conditions, with the new feature on and the new feature off.
The test is a speech test with the words stated in noise at either a 5 dB SNR or a 15 dB SNR. The subject is presented with 5 rhyming words and must choose which word they heard. It is a forced choice meaning that the test will not continue with the next word until they've made a selection. They cannot leave any blank and are not penalized for wrong answers. The score is a percentage of words correct with the maximum s
+5 SNR WAKO Feature on
Group
Value
95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
73.5
± 5.2
+5 SNR WAKO Feature off
Group
Value
95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
73.7
± 4.95
+15 SNR WAKO Feature on
Group
Value
95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
87.27
± 4.08
+15 SNR WAKO Feature off
Group
Value
95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
88.1
± 4.63
Handling/Usability PerformanceSecondary· 2 hour period of usability testing with tasks and questionnaires.
The usability of the new device will be measured with a 3-point rating scale used by the tester to evaluate tasks performed by the end user as well as questionnaires and interviews.
The questionnaire asks subjects to perform tasks, and the clinician rates the ease with which they complete the tasks. 2 is the highest score meaning that they could complete without help, 1 means that they required some assistance, and 0 means that they could not complete the task. A higher score means a better outcome.
Group
Value
95% CI
Experimental: Successor Hearing Aid to Juna
97
EventsSecondary· A 2 hour period of interviews and questionnaires after having worn the devices for approximately 2 weeks and keeping a diary to make notes of device behavior.
Events will be measured by the reporting of unexpected sounds or behavior of the device through questionnaires, diaries, and interviews. The number of events reported including AEs related to the device will be used to measure the outcome. Less events is a better outcome.
Group
Value
95% CI
Experimental: Succssor Hearing Aid to Juna
4
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: 4 months.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of the hearing aid under laboratory as well as everyday conditions. In addition, the performance data of the hearing aid are compared with a Bernafon hearing aid already available on the market.
The hearing aids are adapted according to the user requirements. The data collected in the study is intended to show that the benefit of the hearing aid being examined is identical or better than the current CE-marked hearing aid. A further aim is to improve the adaptation of the hearing device in such a way that the benefit for people with hearing impairments can be increased.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
NCT07176936 — Improving Speech in Noise Using Noninvasive Stimulation
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07506408 — Randomised Study of Web-Based Auditory Training With Varying Perceptual and Cognitive Demands on Training Gains and Gene
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07218913 — Testing the Addition of Pedmark to Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Reducing Drug-Induced Ear Damage in Men With Stage II-III
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07414329 — Efficacy and Effectiveness of an Investigational Behind-the-Ear Hearing Device Kit
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06930560 — HEARS-NPS: Addressing Hearing Loss as a Common Unmet Contributor of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms
· NA
· recruiting
Other Bernafon AG trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT04939259 — A Comparative Clinical Investigation of Musician's Preference With Hearing Aids
· NA
· completed
NCT04374851 — A Comparative Clinical Investigation of Two Hearing Instrument Digital Signal Processing
· NA
· completed
NCT04147442 — A Standard Music Program Compared to an Optimized Music Program
· NA
· completed
NCT04146272 — A Comparison of a New Acoustic Feedback Canceller in Hearing Aids With the Current System
· NA
· completed
NCT04168229 — A Clinical Investigation of the Benefit: BTE Hearing Aids Versus ITE Hearing Aids
· NA
· completed
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Bernafon AG
Last refreshed: 6 November 2019
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03086018.