Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03081026

Transphyseal Vs. Physeal Sparing ACL Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: Risk of Subsequent Lower Extremity Growth Deformity

Completed Last updated 8 October 2020
What this trial tests

trial testing Bilateral hip to ankle x-ray, exam and strength testing. in ACL Reconstruction in 49 participants. Completed in 6 March 2020.

Timeline
1 May 2017
Primary endpoint
6 March 2020
6 March 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorDuke University
StatusCompleted
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment49
Start date1 May 2017
Primary completion6 March 2020
Estimated completion6 March 2020
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Duke University

Who can join

Adults 6 to 16, any sex, with ACL Reconstruction. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

To assess the risk of lower extremity angular growth deformity following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions in young patients who are not yet skeletally mature. The study will compare two surgical techniques (physeal sparing vs transphyseal).

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for ACL Reconstruction

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Duke University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03081026.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing