Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03060512

To Evaluate Patient Preference of Movantik and Polyethylene Glycol 3350 for Opioid Induced Constipation

Completed Phase 4 Results posted Last updated 13 July 2018
What this trial tests

Phase 4 trial testing Polyethylene Glycol 3350 in Opioid Induced Constipation in 276 participants. Completed in 23 August 2017.

Timeline
2 March 2017
Primary endpoint
23 August 2017
23 August 2017

Quick facts

Lead sponsorAstraZeneca
PhasePhase 4
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designcrossover
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment276
Start date2 March 2017
Primary completion23 August 2017
Estimated completion23 August 2017
Sites53 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

AstraZeneca — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 18 to 84, any sex, with Opioid Induced Constipation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for Opioid-induced Constipation (OIC) Treatment Primary · From Visit 2 (Day 1) of Treatment Period 1 to Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2 (end of study).

The Patient Preference Assessment was conducted at Visit 5 using a 7-point scale in subjects with chronic non-cancer pain. The 3 categories were formed by collapsing the 7-point rating scale to: 1. Prefer Movantik (including Strong preference for Movantik, Moderate preference for Movantik, Slight preference for Movantik), 2. No preference, and 3. Prefer PEG 3350 (including Strong preference for PEG 3350, Moderate preference for PEG 3350, and Slight preference for PEG 3350). The number of subjects in each category is presented for the total number of subjects in the Per-Protocol (PP) Set.

Prefer Movantik
GroupValue95% CI
Total (PP Set)124
Prefer PEG 3350
GroupValue95% CI
Total (PP Set)118
No preference
GroupValue95% CI
Total (PP Set)4
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for OIC Treatment by Treatment Sequence Primary · From Visit 2 (Day 1) of Treatment Period 1 to Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2 (end of study).

The Patient Preference Assessment was conducted at Visit 5 using a 7-point scale in subjects with chronic non-cancer pain. The following categories were the possible responses: Strong preference for Movantik, Moderate preference for Movantik, Slight preference for Movantik, No preference, Slight preference for PEG 3350, Moderate preference for PEG 3350 and Strong preference for PEG 3350. Prefer Movantik included subjects in the categories Strong preference for Movantik, Moderate preference for Movantik and Slight preference for Movantik. Prefer PEG 3350 included subjects in the categories Stro

Strong preference for Movantik
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 335037
PEG 3350, Then Movantik38
Moderate preference for Movantik
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 335014
PEG 3350, Then Movantik17
Slight preference for Movantik
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 335011
PEG 3350, Then Movantik7
No preference
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 33502
PEG 3350, Then Movantik2
Slight preference for PEG 3350
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 33509
PEG 3350, Then Movantik8
Moderate preference for PEG 3350
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 335015
PEG 3350, Then Movantik23
Strong preference for PEG 3350
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 335037
PEG 3350, Then Movantik26
Prefer Movantik
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 335062
PEG 3350, Then Movantik62
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Median Scores That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 Secondary · From Visit 2 (Day 1) of Treatment Period 1 to Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2 (end of study).

In order to assess the reason for patient preference of Movantik or PEG 3350, subjects reported on the influence of 5 medication characteristics using a 4-point rating scale. The following were the scale options: efficacy ('worked better to relieve my OIC'), tolerability ('tolerated better'), convenience ('was more convenient'), works quickly ('worked quickly') and works predictably ('worked predictably'). For each characteristic, influence scores were rated as: 0 = No influence, 1 = Mildly influenced, 2 = Moderately influenced or 3 = Strongly influenced. The scale range for each characteristi

Worked better to relieve my OIC
GroupValue95% CI
Preferred Movantik2.00 – 3
Preferred PEG 33502.00 – 3
Tolerated better
GroupValue95% CI
Preferred Movantik3.00 – 3
Preferred PEG 33503.00 – 3
Was more convenient
GroupValue95% CI
Preferred Movantik3.00 – 3
Preferred PEG 33501.00 – 3
Worked quickly
GroupValue95% CI
Preferred Movantik2.00 – 3
Preferred PEG 33502.00 – 3
Worked predictably
GroupValue95% CI
Preferred Movantik2.00 – 3
Preferred PEG 33502.00 – 3
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 Secondary · From Visit 2 (Day 1) of Treatment Period 1 to Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2 (end of study).

In order to assess the reason for patient preference of Movantik or PEG 3350, subjects reported on the influence of 5 medication characteristics using a 4-point rating scale. The following were the scale options: efficacy ('worked better to relieve my OIC'), tolerability ('tolerated better'), convenience ('was more convenient'), works quickly ('worked quickly') and works predictably ('worked predictably'). For each characteristic, influence scores were rated as: 0 = No influence, 1 = Mildly influenced, 2 = Moderately influenced or 3 = Strongly influenced. The scale range for each characteristi

Efficacy: No Influence
GroupValue95% CI
Preferred Movantik4
Preferred PEG 33502
Efficacy: Mildly Influenced
GroupValue95% CI
Preferred Movantik18
Preferred PEG 335020
Efficacy: Moderately Influenced
GroupValue95% CI
Preferred Movantik40
Preferred PEG 335043
Efficacy: Strongly Influenced
GroupValue95% CI
Preferred Movantik61
Preferred PEG 335052
Tolerability: No Influence
GroupValue95% CI
Preferred Movantik14
Preferred PEG 335015
Tolerability: Mildly Influenced
GroupValue95% CI
Preferred Movantik16
Preferred PEG 335011
Tolerability: Moderately Influenced
GroupValue95% CI
Preferred Movantik30
Preferred PEG 335032
Tolerability: Strongly Influenced
GroupValue95% CI
Preferred Movantik63
Preferred PEG 335059
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC Symptoms Secondary · At Visit 3 (Day 15) of Treatment Period 1 and Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2.

PGIC was measured on a 7-point scale at the end of each two-week treatment period to assess the subject's impression of the effectiveness of the treatment received for OIC. The scoring was as follows: 1 = No change (or condition has gotten worse); 2 = Almost the same, hardly any change at all; 3 = A little better, but no noticeable change; 4 = Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference; 5 = Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change; 6 = Better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference; and 7 = A great deal better and a considera

GroupValue95% CI
Movantik FAS4.5± 1.83
PEG 3350 FAS4.5± 1.83
PGIC Questionnaire Individual Item Results to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC Symptoms Secondary · At Visit 3 (Day 15) of Treatment Period 1 and Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2.

PGIC was measured on a 7-point scale at the end of each two-week treatment period to assess the subject's impression of the effectiveness of the treatment received for OIC. The subjects selected one of the following PGIC items as their response: 1 = No change (or condition has gotten worse); 2 = Almost the same, hardly any change at all; 3 = A little better, but no noticeable change; 4 = Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real differences; 5 = Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change; 6 = Better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile differenc

PGIC Item 1
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik FAS23
PEG 3350 FAS27
PGIC Item 2
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik FAS30
PEG 3350 FAS27
PGIC Item 3
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik FAS21
PEG 3350 FAS20
PGIC Item 4
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik FAS38
PEG 3350 FAS33
PGIC Item 5
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik FAS57
PEG 3350 FAS66
PGIC Item 6
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik FAS61
PEG 3350 FAS65
PGIC Item 7
GroupValue95% CI
Movantik FAS32
PEG 3350 FAS28
Mean Change From Baseline at Visit 3/5 in Bowel Function Index (BFI) Questionnaire Scores to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC Symptoms Secondary · From Baseline (Visit 2, Day 1) to Visit 3 (Day 15) and Visit 5 (Day 36).

The BFI is a 3-item questionnaire administered by a study clinician to measure constipation from the subject's perspective (ease of defecation, feeling of complete evacuation, and personal judgment of constipation). For each item the subject was asked to rate their response on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates the best response (easy/no diffculty) and 100 the worst response (severe difficulty). The total BFI score was calculated as the mean of the 3 item scores. The mean change from baseline in BFI scores at Visits 3 and/or 5 are presented.

GroupValue95% CI
Movantik FAS-25.0± 31.64
PEG 3350 FAS-26.0± 28.82

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Approximately 5 weeks.. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Movantik
Serious: 3/271 (1%)
Deaths: 0/271
PEG 3350
Serious: 1/268 (0%)
Deaths: 0/268

Serious adverse events (6 terms)

ReactionSystemMovantikPEG 3350
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders
HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
AphasiaNervous system disorders
SalmonellosisInfections and infestations
Other adverse events (77 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemMovantikPEG 3350
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders
FlatulenceGastrointestinal disorders
HeadacheNervous system disorders
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distensionGastrointestinal disorders
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders
Defaecation urgencyGastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
Drug withdrawal syndromeGeneral disorders
Non-cardiac chest painGeneral disorders
BronchitisInfections and infestations
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations
LacerationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
DizzinessNervous system disorders
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lymph node painBlood and lymphatic system disorders
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders
BradycardiaCardiac disorders
Diastolic dysfunctionCardiac disorders
Abdominal pain lowerGastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal tendernessGastrointestinal disorders
Abnormal faecesGastrointestinal disorders
EnteritisGastrointestinal disorders
EructationGastrointestinal disorders
Frequent bowel movementsGastrointestinal disorders
Rectal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders
ToothacheGastrointestinal disorders
Influenza like illnessGeneral disorders
MalaiseGeneral disorders
OedemaGeneral disorders
Abscess limbInfections and infestations
ConjunctivitisInfections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viralInfections and infestations
HordeolumInfections and infestations

Most-reported serious reactions: Gastroenteritis, Cardiac failure congestive, Diarrhoea, Hypokalaemia, Aphasia, Salmonellosis.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03060512 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients with opioid induced constipation prefer treatment with naloxegol (Movantik) or with Polyethylene Glycol 3350.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. A Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective, Crossover, Open-Label Study of Factors Associated With Patient Preferences for Naloxegol or PEG 3350 for Opioid-Induced Constipation.
    Brenner DM, Hu Y, Datto C, Creanga D, et al · · 2019 · cited 8× · PMID 31058652 · DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000229

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Polyethylene Glycol 3350

Trials testing the same drug.

Other AstraZeneca trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03060512.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing