Adults 18 to 84, any sex, with Opioid Induced Constipation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for Opioid-induced Constipation (OIC) TreatmentPrimary· From Visit 2 (Day 1) of Treatment Period 1 to Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2 (end of study).
The Patient Preference Assessment was conducted at Visit 5 using a 7-point scale in subjects with chronic non-cancer pain. The 3 categories were formed by collapsing the 7-point rating scale to: 1. Prefer Movantik (including Strong preference for Movantik, Moderate preference for Movantik, Slight preference for Movantik), 2. No preference, and 3. Prefer PEG 3350 (including Strong preference for PEG 3350, Moderate preference for PEG 3350, and Slight preference for PEG 3350). The number of subjects in each category is presented for the total number of subjects in the Per-Protocol (PP) Set.
Prefer Movantik
Group
Value
95% CI
Total (PP Set)
124
Prefer PEG 3350
Group
Value
95% CI
Total (PP Set)
118
No preference
Group
Value
95% CI
Total (PP Set)
4
Patient Reported Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350 for OIC Treatment by Treatment SequencePrimary· From Visit 2 (Day 1) of Treatment Period 1 to Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2 (end of study).
The Patient Preference Assessment was conducted at Visit 5 using a 7-point scale in subjects with chronic non-cancer pain. The following categories were the possible responses: Strong preference for Movantik, Moderate preference for Movantik, Slight preference for Movantik, No preference, Slight preference for PEG 3350, Moderate preference for PEG 3350 and Strong preference for PEG 3350. Prefer Movantik included subjects in the categories Strong preference for Movantik, Moderate preference for Movantik and Slight preference for Movantik. Prefer PEG 3350 included subjects in the categories Stro
Strong preference for Movantik
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 3350
37
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
38
Moderate preference for Movantik
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 3350
14
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
17
Slight preference for Movantik
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 3350
11
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
7
No preference
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 3350
2
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
2
Slight preference for PEG 3350
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 3350
9
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
8
Moderate preference for PEG 3350
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 3350
15
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
23
Strong preference for PEG 3350
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 3350
37
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
26
Prefer Movantik
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik, Then PEG 3350
62
PEG 3350, Then Movantik
62
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Median Scores That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350Secondary· From Visit 2 (Day 1) of Treatment Period 1 to Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2 (end of study).
In order to assess the reason for patient preference of Movantik or PEG 3350, subjects reported on the influence of 5 medication characteristics using a 4-point rating scale. The following were the scale options: efficacy ('worked better to relieve my OIC'), tolerability ('tolerated better'), convenience ('was more convenient'), works quickly ('worked quickly') and works predictably ('worked predictably'). For each characteristic, influence scores were rated as: 0 = No influence, 1 = Mildly influenced, 2 = Moderately influenced or 3 = Strongly influenced. The scale range for each characteristi
Worked better to relieve my OIC
Group
Value
95% CI
Preferred Movantik
2.0
0 – 3
Preferred PEG 3350
2.0
0 – 3
Tolerated better
Group
Value
95% CI
Preferred Movantik
3.0
0 – 3
Preferred PEG 3350
3.0
0 – 3
Was more convenient
Group
Value
95% CI
Preferred Movantik
3.0
0 – 3
Preferred PEG 3350
1.0
0 – 3
Worked quickly
Group
Value
95% CI
Preferred Movantik
2.0
0 – 3
Preferred PEG 3350
2.0
0 – 3
Worked predictably
Group
Value
95% CI
Preferred Movantik
2.0
0 – 3
Preferred PEG 3350
2.0
0 – 3
Patient Reported Influence of Each Medication Characteristic Individual Category Results That Contributed to Their Overall Preference for Movantik or PEG 3350Secondary· From Visit 2 (Day 1) of Treatment Period 1 to Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2 (end of study).
In order to assess the reason for patient preference of Movantik or PEG 3350, subjects reported on the influence of 5 medication characteristics using a 4-point rating scale. The following were the scale options: efficacy ('worked better to relieve my OIC'), tolerability ('tolerated better'), convenience ('was more convenient'), works quickly ('worked quickly') and works predictably ('worked predictably'). For each characteristic, influence scores were rated as: 0 = No influence, 1 = Mildly influenced, 2 = Moderately influenced or 3 = Strongly influenced. The scale range for each characteristi
Efficacy: No Influence
Group
Value
95% CI
Preferred Movantik
4
Preferred PEG 3350
2
Efficacy: Mildly Influenced
Group
Value
95% CI
Preferred Movantik
18
Preferred PEG 3350
20
Efficacy: Moderately Influenced
Group
Value
95% CI
Preferred Movantik
40
Preferred PEG 3350
43
Efficacy: Strongly Influenced
Group
Value
95% CI
Preferred Movantik
61
Preferred PEG 3350
52
Tolerability: No Influence
Group
Value
95% CI
Preferred Movantik
14
Preferred PEG 3350
15
Tolerability: Mildly Influenced
Group
Value
95% CI
Preferred Movantik
16
Preferred PEG 3350
11
Tolerability: Moderately Influenced
Group
Value
95% CI
Preferred Movantik
30
Preferred PEG 3350
32
Tolerability: Strongly Influenced
Group
Value
95% CI
Preferred Movantik
63
Preferred PEG 3350
59
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC SymptomsSecondary· At Visit 3 (Day 15) of Treatment Period 1 and Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2.
PGIC was measured on a 7-point scale at the end of each two-week treatment period to assess the subject's impression of the effectiveness of the treatment received for OIC. The scoring was as follows: 1 = No change (or condition has gotten worse); 2 = Almost the same, hardly any change at all; 3 = A little better, but no noticeable change; 4 = Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference; 5 = Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change; 6 = Better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference; and 7 = A great deal better and a considera
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik FAS
4.5
± 1.83
PEG 3350 FAS
4.5
± 1.83
PGIC Questionnaire Individual Item Results to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC SymptomsSecondary· At Visit 3 (Day 15) of Treatment Period 1 and Visit 5 (Day 36) of Treatment Period 2.
PGIC was measured on a 7-point scale at the end of each two-week treatment period to assess the subject's impression of the effectiveness of the treatment received for OIC. The subjects selected one of the following PGIC items as their response: 1 = No change (or condition has gotten worse); 2 = Almost the same, hardly any change at all; 3 = A little better, but no noticeable change; 4 = Somewhat better, but the change has not made any real differences; 5 = Moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change; 6 = Better and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile differenc
PGIC Item 1
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik FAS
23
PEG 3350 FAS
27
PGIC Item 2
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik FAS
30
PEG 3350 FAS
27
PGIC Item 3
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik FAS
21
PEG 3350 FAS
20
PGIC Item 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik FAS
38
PEG 3350 FAS
33
PGIC Item 5
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik FAS
57
PEG 3350 FAS
66
PGIC Item 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik FAS
61
PEG 3350 FAS
65
PGIC Item 7
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik FAS
32
PEG 3350 FAS
28
Mean Change From Baseline at Visit 3/5 in Bowel Function Index (BFI) Questionnaire Scores to Compare the Impact of Movantik and PEG 3350 on OIC SymptomsSecondary· From Baseline (Visit 2, Day 1) to Visit 3 (Day 15) and Visit 5 (Day 36).
The BFI is a 3-item questionnaire administered by a study clinician to measure constipation from the subject's perspective (ease of defecation, feeling of complete evacuation, and personal judgment of constipation). For each item the subject was asked to rate their response on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates the best response (easy/no diffculty) and 100 the worst response (severe difficulty). The total BFI score was calculated as the mean of the 3 item scores.
The mean change from baseline in BFI scores at Visits 3 and/or 5 are presented.
Group
Value
95% CI
Movantik FAS
-25.0
± 31.64
PEG 3350 FAS
-26.0
± 28.82
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Approximately 5 weeks..
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients with opioid induced constipation prefer treatment with naloxegol (Movantik) or with Polyethylene Glycol 3350.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT06159777 — Pre-operative Polyethylene Glycol 3350 for Minimally Invasive Urogynecologic Surgery
· Phase 4
· completed
NCT05897086 — Polyethylene-glycol Assisted Nerve Repair in Phalloplasty
· Phase 2, PHASE3
· enrolling by invitation
NCT05805436 — Preop Laxatives in Robotic Urologic Surgery
· Phase 4
· recruiting
NCT05726344 — Lactulose vs. Polyethylene Glycol as Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Adults
· NA
· completed
NCT05318365 — Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction in Children
· NA
· recruiting
Other AstraZeneca trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06998095 — Tezepelumab (Tezspire) Regulatory Postmarketing Surveillance in Korea
· not yet recruiting
NCT07431775 — Saphnelo Use in Females of Child-bearing Potential
· not yet recruiting
NCT07516184 — Explore the Diagnostic Value of Bronchodilation Test With Portable Oscillometry in Asthma Diagnosis
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07279935 — Osimertinib Combined With Chemotherapy in Patients Who Had Distant Recurrence After Adjuvant Osimertinib for EGFRm Resec
· Phase 4
· not yet recruiting
NCT07279948 — A Single-arm Observational Study to Characterize the Demographic, Clinical Features and Outcomes of a Brazilian Cohort o
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by AstraZeneca
Last refreshed: 13 July 2018
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03060512.