Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03053570

Study Comparing Pulmonary Vein Isolation With the Cryoballoon and Radiofrequency Energy(Contact Force) in the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) (Cryo Vs CF in PerAF)

Status unknown NA Last updated 15 February 2017
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Cryoballoon in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in 200 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 March 2017
Primary endpoint
31 December 2018
31 December 2018

Quick facts

Lead sponsorChina Cardiometabolic Registries
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment200
Start date1 March 2017
Primary completion31 December 2018
Estimated completion31 December 2018
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

China Cardiometabolic Registries

Who can join

Adults 18 to 75, any sex, with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this study is to perform a prospective, randomised study investigating the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon catheter ablation compared with radiofrequency ablation(contact force), in the treatment of persistent AF.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03053570.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing