Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT03052764: LO-BOT

Evaluation of an Alternative Injection Paradigm for OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in Patients With Urinary Incontinence

Completed Phase 4 Results posted Last updated 24 December 2019
What this trial tests

Phase 4 trial testing onabotulinumtoxinA in Urinary Bladder, Overactive in 120 participants. Completed in 10 December 2018.

Timeline
12 December 2016
Primary endpoint
10 December 2018
10 December 2018

Quick facts

Lead sponsorAllergan
PhasePhase 4
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingquadruple
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment120
Start date12 December 2016
Primary completion10 December 2018
Estimated completion10 December 2018
Sites31 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Allergan — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Urinary Bladder, Overactive or Urinary Incontinence. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Change From Baseline in Daily Average Number of Urinary Incontinence Episodes Primary · Baseline (3 consecutive days during the Screening Period; within 35 days prior to Day 1) to 3 consecutive days prior to Week 12

The participant recorded urinary incontinence in a 3-day bladder diary. Data for the three days was averaged. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a factor at 2 levels, and the number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) episodes reported at Baseline (\<= 9 versus \> 9 daily episodes) and Baseline daily average number of episodes of incontinence as covariates was used for analyses.

GroupValue95% CI
BOTOX® 100 U/BOTOX® 100 U-2.99± 0.488
Placebo/BOTOX® 100 U-0.42± 0.612
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Continence Secondary · Baseline (3 consecutive days during the Screening Period; within 35 days prior to Day 1) to 3 consecutive days prior to Week 12]

Complete continence is defined as 100% reduction in urinary incontinence from Baseline.

GroupValue95% CI
BOTOX® 100 U/BOTOX® 100 U13.9
Placebo/BOTOX® 100 U2.7
Change From Baseline in Daily Average Number of Micturition Episodes Secondary · Baseline (3 consecutive days during the Screening Period; within 35 days prior to Day 1) to 3 consecutive days prior to Week 12

The participant recorded the number of micturition episodes in a 3-day bladder diary. Data for the three days was averaged. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model with treatment as a factor at 2 levels, and the number of UUI episodes reported at Baseline (\<= 9 versus \> 9 daily episodes) and Baseline daily average number of micturition as covariates was used for analyses.

GroupValue95% CI
BOTOX® 100 U/BOTOX® 100 U-2.25± 0.421
Placebo/BOTOX® 100 U-0.01± 0.525
Change From Baseline in Daily Average Number of Urgency Episodes Secondary · Baseline (3 consecutive days during the Screening Period; within 35 days prior to Day 1) to 3 consecutive days prior to Week 12

The participant recorded the number of urgency episode in a 3-day bladder diary. Data for the three days was averaged. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model with treatment as a factor at 2 levels, and the number of UUI episodes reported at Baseline (\<= 9 versus \> 9 daily episodes) and Baseline daily average number of urgency episodes as covariates was used for analyses.

GroupValue95% CI
BOTOX® 100 U/BOTOX® 100 U-2.79± 0.491
Placebo/BOTOX® 100 U-0.23± 0.618
Change From Baseline in Daily Average Number of Nocturia Episodes Secondary · Baseline (3 consecutive days during the Screening Period; within 35 days prior to Day 1) to, 3 consecutive days prior to Week 12

The participants recorded the number of nocturia episodes in a 3-day bladder diary. Data for the three days was averaged. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model with treatment as a factor at 2 levels, and the number of UUI episodes reported at Baseline (\<= 9 versus \> 9 daily episodes) and Baseline daily average number of nocturia episodes as covariates was used for analyses.

GroupValue95% CI
BOTOX® 100 U/BOTOX® 100 U-0.53± 0.154
Placebo/BOTOX® 100 U0.17± 0.193
Percentage of Participants Who Have a Positive Treatment Response on the Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS) Secondary · Week 12

The participant rated their condition during treatment using the TBS 4-point scale where: 1=greatly improved, 2=improved, 3=not changed or 4=worsened. A positive treatment response is either as score of 1=greatly improved or 2=improved.

GroupValue95% CI
BOTOX® 100 U/BOTOX® 100 U74.0
Placebo/BOTOX® 100 U17.6

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Randomization to the Study Exit Visit (Up to 70 Weeks). Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Double Blind: BOTOX® 100 U
Serious: 5/78 (6%)
Deaths: 0/80
Double Blind: Placebo
Serious: 2/39 (5%)
Deaths: 0/40
Open Label: BOTOX® 100 U/BOTOX® 100 U
Serious: 2/58 (3%)
Deaths: 0/58
Open Label: Placebo/BOTOX® 100 U
Serious: 1/33 (3%)
Deaths: 0/33

Serious adverse events (15 terms)

ReactionSystemDouble Blind: BOTOX® 100 UDouble Blind: PlaceboOpen Label: BOTOX® 100 U/B…Open Label: Placebo/BOTOX®…
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Acute coronary syndromeCardiac disorders
HaematocheziaGastrointestinal disorders
CellulitisInfections and infestations
Post procedural cellulitisInfections and infestations
PyelonephritisInfections and infestations
UrosepsisInfections and infestations
Breast cancer recurrentNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
SciaticaNervous system disorders
Urinary bladder haemorrhageRenal and urinary disorders
Arteriosclerosis coronary arteryCardiac disorders
Chest painGeneral disorders
Troponin increasedInvestigations
HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
SyncopeNervous system disorders
Other adverse events (3 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemDouble Blind: BOTOX® 100 UDouble Blind: PlaceboOpen Label: BOTOX® 100 U/B…Open Label: Placebo/BOTOX®…
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations
DysuriaRenal and urinary disorders
Productive coughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Anaemia, Acute coronary syndrome, Haematochezia, Cellulitis, Post procedural cellulitis, Pyelonephritis, Urosepsis, Breast cancer recurrent.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03052764 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (BOTOX®), compared to placebo, when injected into the bladder using an alternative injection paradigm in reducing the number of daily urinary incontinence episodes in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) and urinary incontinence whose symptoms have not been adequately managed with an anticholinergic.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. 2019 NSAUA Abstracts.
    · 2019 · PMID 31536472 · DOI 10.5489/cuaj.6197

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of onabotulinumtoxinA

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Urinary Bladder, Overactive

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Allergan trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03052764.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing