Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT03021863: ResponseQT
How Frequently and in What Format Are Research Trial Results Disseminated to Participants (ResponseQT)
NA trial testing Group A Reminder in Motivation in 1,198 participants. Completed in 30 September 2019.
30 June 2018
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | ThinkWell |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | triple |
| Primary purpose | health services research |
| Enrollment | 1,198 |
| Start date | 15 January 2017 |
| Primary completion | 30 June 2018 |
| Estimated completion | 30 September 2019 |
| Sites | 1 location across United Kingdom |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Group A Reminder
- Group B Reminder
- Group C Reminder
- Group D Reminder
- Group E Reminder
- Group F Reminder
- Group G Reminder
- Group H Reminder
- Group I Reminder
Conditions studied
- Motivation — all drugs for Motivation →
Sponsor
ThinkWell
Who can join
18 and older, any sex, with Motivation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Questionnaires are frequently used in online research, however recruiting, and completion rates of online participants from a variety of cultures and demographic backgrounds can be challenging. The challenge is greater in an online cohort because there is no way to observe the participant beyond what is contributed online. Poor recruiting and completion can result in underpowered research that may not be representative of the sample population. This can trigger an increase in costs as the recruitment period may have to be extended until sample size is reached. When recruiting and completion rates are inadequate studies may have to be terminated and the answer to the research question can remain unknown. To mitigate these challenges, reminder emails are sent to questionnaire respondents. There is uncertainty about how the tone of the email reminder affects the proportion of recruitment rates. A nested randomized trial will be used to test the intervention of tone delivery in survey email reminders to establish an evidence base. This study (ResponseQT) proposes to link with the anticipated 20,000 person international cohort study, (How Frequently and in What Format are Research Trial Results Disseminated to Participants: A Survey of Trialists (ResponseQT) to explore the evidence of effect for the research question, "Does the tone of a survey email reminder affect the proportion of survey participants recruited. The population will consist of researchers who have published a clinical trial indexed in Pub Med in 2014-15.The intervention is the tone of questionnaire email reminders and the outcomes will be the proportion of participants recruited after invitation (partial plus complete responses) following reminder 1 and 2.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT03021863
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other trials of Group A Reminder
Trials testing the same drug.
- NCT02961036 — The Role of Supplementary Material in Journal Articles QT · NA · completed
Other recruiting trials for Motivation
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT07413185 — Relationship Between the Severity of Sleep Deprivation in the First 48 Hours Postpartum, Breastfeeding Motivation, and B · recruiting
- NCT07067554 — Breastfeeding Myths and Mothers' Motivation · recruiting
- NCT07113067 — Accelerated rTMS vs. Sham for Stroke Apathy · Phase 1, PHASE2 · recruiting
- NCT06826703 — The Effect of Motivational Interviewing on Diabetes Self-Management and Severity of Cyberchondria in Individuals With Di · NA · recruiting
- NCT07143123 — Enhancing Nursing Skills With SimCapture Technology · NA · active not recruiting
Other ThinkWell trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT03498365 — Effects of the Use of Multi Criterion Decision Analysis (MCDA) on Decision Quality in an Online Delphi · NA · completed
- NCT03498690 — Protocol Lab for Online Trials-Delphi · NA · completed
- NCT03498677 — Protocol Lab for Online Trial Delphi and Question Effects · NA · completed
- NCT03505450 — Effects of Population Compared to Purposive Sampling for Consensus in an Online Delphi Study · completed
- NCT02961036 — The Role of Supplementary Material in Journal Articles QT · NA · completed
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03021863 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by ThinkWell
- Last refreshed: 22 March 2021
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT03021863.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing