Adults 18 to 70, any sex, with Olfactory Disorder. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Pre- and Post-intervention Difference in Functional Connectivity Before and After Smell Training.Primary· 12 weeks
Baseline and post-intervention connectivity within and between regions of interest in the olfactory and olfactory related networks using resting state fMRI will be obtained. Resting-state connectivity was analyzed using the CONN toolbox version 18b (https://web.conn-toolbox.org/) and SPM12, version 7487 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging). Functional connectivity values (Fisher z-transformed Pearson correlation coefficients) were compared using a paired, 2-tailed t test and corrected for multiple comparisons. p\<0.05 was considered to be significant.
Group
Value
95% CI
Smell Training
5
Pre- and Post-intervention Difference in Smell Testing Before and After Budesonide TreatmentSecondary· 30 days
Objective pre- and post-intervention differences of participant performance on the UPSIT and Sniffin Sticks tests before and after budesonide saline nasal irrigation.
University of Pennsylvania Identification Test (UPSIT) consists of 4 odor-impregnated booklets that participants scratch and sniff to identify various odors, and scores account for differences in sex. Hyposmia is defined as a score of 19 to 34 for females and 19 to 33 for males. Anosmia for either sex is defined as a score below 18. Possible scores range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating better sense of smell.
Sniffin'
UPSIT
Group
Value
95% CI
Budesonide Nasal Irrigation
19.5
5 – 40
TDI
Group
Value
95% CI
Budesonide Nasal Irrigation
17.5
7 – 27.2
Subjective Response to Smell Training InterventionSecondary· 12 weeks
Participants subjective sense of smell following intervention is measured using a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100 with 0 representing no sense of smell and 100 representing best possible sense of smell.
Group
Value
95% CI
Smell Training
23.8
9 – 83.8
Comparison of Olfactory Network in Healthy Controls to Study ParticipantsSecondary· 1 week
Baseline functional connectivity within and between the olfactory and associated networks of healthy controls will be compared to that of study participants prior to smell intervention treatment as measured by rs-fMRI.Resting-state connectivity was analyzed using the CONN toolbox version 18b (https://web.conn-toolbox.org/) and SPM12, version 7487 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging). Functional connectivity values (Fisher z-transformed Pearson correlation coefficients) were compared using a paired, 2-tailed t test and corrected for multiple comparisons . P \< .05 was considered statistical
Group
Value
95% CI
Control Group
13
Pre- and Post-intervention Difference in Smell Testing Before and After Smell TrainingSecondary· 12 weeks
Objective pre- and post-intervention differences of participant performance on the UPSIT and Sniffin Sticks tests before and after budesonide saline nasal irrigation.
University of Pennsylvania Identification Test (UPSIT) consists of 4 odor-impregnated booklets that participants scratch and sniff to identify various odors, and scores account for differences in sex. Hyposmia is defined as a score of 19 to 34 for females and 19 to 33 for males. Anosmia for either sex is defined as a score below 18. Possible scores range from 0 to 40 with higher scores representing better sense of smell.
Sniffi
UPSIT
Group
Value
95% CI
Smell Training
19
9 – 40
TDI
Group
Value
95% CI
Smell Training
18.3
7 – 34.5
Pre and Post Difference in QOD-NS After Smell TrainingSecondary· 12 weeks
The QOD-NS is a validated 17-item questionnaire that pertains to olfactory-specific quality of life domains adversely impacted by olfactory dysfunction and is inversely scored (maximum score of 51), with higher scores reflective of more impaired quality of life.
Group
Value
95% CI
Smell Training
7.4
0 – 17.1
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Up through 13 months.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The purpose of this research study is to examine the efficacy of a 12-week smell training intervention for participants with olfactory dysfunction following an infection of the upper respiratory tract.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Washington University School of Medicine
Last refreshed: 4 November 2022
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02985515.