Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT02966158: CAT vs MICE

A Randomized Controlled Trial in Women With Coronary Artery Disease Investigating the Effects of Aerobic Interval Training Versus Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise

Completed NA Last updated 2 December 2019
What this trial tests

NA trial testing AIT Group in Coronary Artery Disease in 31 participants. Completed in 22 October 2019.

Timeline
1 March 2017
Primary endpoint
31 August 2019
22 October 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity Health Network, Toronto
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposeprevention
Enrollment31
Start date1 March 2017
Primary completion31 August 2019
Estimated completion22 October 2019
Sites1 location across Canada

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto

Who can join

Eligibility, female only, with Coronary Artery Disease. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Heart disease is the number one killer amongst chronic diseases around the world, and it is responsible for taking the lives of an estimated 17.5 million people each year. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs, which help heart patients improve their current health, prevent future heart problems, and improve their quality of life, are an effective strategy for lowering the risk of heart-related deaths in heart patients. CR programs currently have their patients perform moderate intensity, continuous exercise (MICE), which traditionally takes the form of walking, jogging, or cycling at a comfortable pace for 30-60 minutes. Recently, aerobic interval training (AIT), which involves performing short bouts of exercise, typically ranging from 15 seconds to four minutes at near maximal effort, followed by periods of recovery or rest, has emerged as a more effective strategy than MICE for lowering the risk of heart-related deaths in heart patients. Although these initial findings appear to hold much promise for improving CR programs in the future, it is important to recognize that women have been underrepresented or not included in these studies to date. Therefore, the goal of this study is to determine the effects of AIT versus MICE on the risk of heart-related death, blood vessel health, and brain health in women who have heart disease, and who have been referred to a six-month, outpatient CR program.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Randomised controlled trial in women with coronary artery disease investigating the effects of aerobic interval training versus moderate intensity continuous exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: CAT versus MICE study.
    Lee LS, Tsai MC, Brooks D, Oh PI. · · 2019 · cited 21× · PMID 31749981 · DOI 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000589

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University Health Network, Toronto trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02966158.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing