Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT02949921

Radiological Evaluation of Radiesse Implantation in the Hands

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 29 November 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Radiesse injectable implant and 2% lidocaine HCL in Volume Loss in the Dorsum of the Hand in 20 participants. Completed in 2 January 2018.

Timeline
1 December 2015
Primary endpoint
2 January 2018
2 January 2018

Quick facts

Lead sponsorMerz North America, Inc.
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationnon randomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment20
Start date1 December 2015
Primary completion2 January 2018
Estimated completion2 January 2018
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Merz North America, Inc. — full company profile →

Who can join

22 and older, any sex, with Volume Loss in the Dorsum of the Hand. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Number of Participants With X-ray of Either Hand With Bone Obscuration at Month 1 Primary · Month 1

Obscuration was defined as any post-treatment hand x-ray that at least 1 of the 2 blinded radiologist interpreted as Radiesse obscuring bones.

GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0
Number of Participants With X-ray of Either Hand With Bone Obscuration at Month 6 Primary · Month 6

Obscuration was defined as any post-treatment hand x-ray that at least 1 of the 2 blinded radiologist interpreted as Radiesse obscuring bones.

GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0
Number of Participants With X-ray of Either Hand With Bone Obscuration at Month 24 Primary · Month 24

Obscuration was defined as any post-treatment hand x-ray that at least 1 of the 2 blinded radiologist interpreted as Radiesse obscuring bones.

GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0
Percentage of Participants Reporting One or More Device or Injection-related Severe Adverse Events (AEs) at Months 1 and 6 Secondary · Months 1 and 6
Month 1
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group10.0
Month 6
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group10.0
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) Scores Secondary · Baseline, Months 1, 6, 7, 12, 13, 18, 19 and 24

The MHQ is a hand-specific outcomes instrument that measures outcomes of participants with conditions of, or injury to, the hand or wrist. The MHQ contains six domains: overall hand function, activities of daily living, work performance, pain, aesthetics and satisfaction. For this study, MHQ overall hand function and MHQ pain domains were evaluated. Scores for both scales range from 0-100. Higher MHQ hand function scores denote better hand performance whereas higher MHQ pain scores denote more pain. MHQ minimal clinically important differences were defined as score changes greater than an 11-p

Baseline: Left Hand (Function)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group96.5± 6.69
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group94.0± 12.87
Baseline: Left Hand (Pain)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group2.0± 4.83
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group4.0± 8.10
Baseline: Right Hand (Function)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group99.0± 3.16
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group96.5± 6.69
Baseline: Right Hand (Pain)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group1.0± 2.11
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group3.5± 8.18
Month 1: Left Hand (Function)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group99.5± 1.58
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group98.5± 4.74
Month 1: Left Hand (Pain)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group4.5± 6.43
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group4.5± 11.17
Month 1: Right Hand (Function)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group99.5± 1.58
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group97.5± 5.40
Month 1: Right Hand (Pain)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group2.0± 3.50
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group4.5± 9.56
Number of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 1 Point Improvement on the MHGS in Both Hands After Initial Treatment at Months 1 and 6 Secondary · Months 1 and 6

The MHGS was used to measure clinical efficacy of the Radiesse hand treatments by a masked evaluator performing live, dorsal hand assessments. The MHGS was an ordinal scale; therefore, ratings were made based on a "snap-shot" at a specific study time point. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect was demonstrated by a decrease in MHGS score. MHGS had 5 categories, where: 0 (no loss of fatty tissue); 1 (mild loss of fatty tissue; slight visibility of veins); 2 (moderate loss of fatty tissue; mild visibility of veins and tendons); 3 (severe loss of fatty tissue; moderate visibility

Month 1
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group10
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group10
Month 6
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group8
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group9
Number of Participants With >=1 Point Improvement on the MHGS in Both Hands Following Retreatment at Months 7 and 12 Secondary · Months 7 and 12

The MHGS was used to measure clinical efficacy of the Radiesse hand treatments by a masked evaluator performing live, dorsal hand assessments. The MHGS was an ordinal scale; therefore, ratings were made based on a "snap-shot" at a specific study time point. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect was demonstrated by a decrease in MHGS score. MHGS had 5 categories, where: 0 (no loss of fatty tissue); 1 (mild loss of fatty tissue; slight visibility of veins); 2 (moderate loss of fatty tissue; mild visibility of veins and tendons); 3 (severe loss of fatty tissue; moderate visibility

Month 7
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group7
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group4
Month 12
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group5
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group3
Percentage of Participants With Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Scores After Initial Treatment at Months 1 and 6 Secondary · Months 1 and 6

The GAIS is a 7-point scale. The 7-point scale are as follows: +3 (very much improved); +2 (much improved); +1 (improved); 0 (no change); -1 (worse); -2 (much worse); -3 (very much worse).

Month 1: Left hand (very much improved)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group60.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group60.0
Month 1: Right hand (very much improved)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group60.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group60.0
Month 1: Left hand (much improved)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group10.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group40.0
Month 1: Right hand (much improved)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group10.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group40.0
Month 1: Left hand (improved)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group30.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0.0
Month 1: Right hand (improved)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group30.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0.0
Month 1: Left hand (no change)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group0.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0.0
Month 1: Right hand (no change)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group0.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0.0
Percentage of Participants With GAIS Scores Following Retreatment at Months 7 and 12 Secondary · Months 7 and 12

The GAIS is a 7-point scale. The 7-point scale are as follows: +3 (very much improved); +2 (much improved); +1 (improved); 0 (no change); -1 (worse); -2 (much worse); -3 (very much worse).

Month 7: Left hand (very much improved)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group57.1
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group75.0
Month 7: Right hand (very much improved)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group57.1
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group75.0
Month 7: Left hand (much improved)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group28.6
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0.0
Month 7: Right hand (much improved)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group28.6
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0.0
Month 7: Left hand (improved)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group14.3
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group25.0
Month 7: Right hand (improved)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group14.3
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group25.0
Month 7: Left hand (no change)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group0.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0.0
Month 7: Right hand (no change)
GroupValue95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group0.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group0.0

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 24. Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
Serious: 0/10 (0%)
Deaths: 0/10
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
Serious: 0/10 (0%)
Deaths: 0/10
Other adverse events (16 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemGroup A: MHGS Grade 4 Hand…Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3…
SwellingGeneral disorders
NoduleGeneral disorders
PainGeneral disorders
Herpes zosterInfections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations
Animal scratchInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fibula fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon ruptureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal burnInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Synovial cystMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Dental implantationSurgical and medical procedures
Oral surgerySurgical and medical procedures
Rotator cuff repairSurgical and medical procedures

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02949921 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The objective of this study is to provide a preliminary assessment of the radiographic appearance of Radiesse material that has been injected into the dorsum of the hands.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Radiesse injectable implant and 2% lidocaine HCL

Trials testing the same drug.

Other Merz North America, Inc. trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02949921.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing