Radiological Evaluation of Radiesse Implantation in the Hands
CompletedNAResults postedLast updated 29 November 2023
What this trial tests
NA trial testing Radiesse injectable implant and 2% lidocaine HCL in Volume Loss in the Dorsum of the Hand in 20 participants. Completed in 2 January 2018.
22 and older, any sex, with Volume Loss in the Dorsum of the Hand. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of Participants With X-ray of Either Hand With Bone Obscuration at Month 1Primary· Month 1
Obscuration was defined as any post-treatment hand x-ray that at least 1 of the 2 blinded radiologist interpreted as Radiesse obscuring bones.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
0
Number of Participants With X-ray of Either Hand With Bone Obscuration at Month 6Primary· Month 6
Obscuration was defined as any post-treatment hand x-ray that at least 1 of the 2 blinded radiologist interpreted as Radiesse obscuring bones.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
0
Number of Participants With X-ray of Either Hand With Bone Obscuration at Month 24Primary· Month 24
Obscuration was defined as any post-treatment hand x-ray that at least 1 of the 2 blinded radiologist interpreted as Radiesse obscuring bones.
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
0
Percentage of Participants Reporting One or More Device or Injection-related Severe Adverse Events (AEs) at Months 1 and 6Secondary· Months 1 and 6
Month 1
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
10.0
Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
10.0
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) ScoresSecondary· Baseline, Months 1, 6, 7, 12, 13, 18, 19 and 24
The MHQ is a hand-specific outcomes instrument that measures outcomes of participants with conditions of, or injury to, the hand or wrist. The MHQ contains six domains: overall hand function, activities of daily living, work performance, pain, aesthetics and satisfaction. For this study, MHQ overall hand function and MHQ pain domains were evaluated. Scores for both scales range from 0-100. Higher MHQ hand function scores denote better hand performance whereas higher MHQ pain scores denote more pain. MHQ minimal clinically important differences were defined as score changes greater than an 11-p
Baseline: Left Hand (Function)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
96.5
± 6.69
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
94.0
± 12.87
Baseline: Left Hand (Pain)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
2.0
± 4.83
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
4.0
± 8.10
Baseline: Right Hand (Function)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
99.0
± 3.16
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
96.5
± 6.69
Baseline: Right Hand (Pain)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
1.0
± 2.11
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
3.5
± 8.18
Month 1: Left Hand (Function)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
99.5
± 1.58
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
98.5
± 4.74
Month 1: Left Hand (Pain)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
4.5
± 6.43
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
4.5
± 11.17
Month 1: Right Hand (Function)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
99.5
± 1.58
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
97.5
± 5.40
Month 1: Right Hand (Pain)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
2.0
± 3.50
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
4.5
± 9.56
Number of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 1 Point Improvement on the MHGS in Both Hands After Initial Treatment at Months 1 and 6Secondary· Months 1 and 6
The MHGS was used to measure clinical efficacy of the Radiesse hand treatments by a masked evaluator performing live, dorsal hand assessments. The MHGS was an ordinal scale; therefore, ratings were made based on a "snap-shot" at a specific study time point. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect was demonstrated by a decrease in MHGS score. MHGS had 5 categories, where: 0 (no loss of fatty tissue); 1 (mild loss of fatty tissue; slight visibility of veins); 2 (moderate loss of fatty tissue; mild visibility of veins and tendons); 3 (severe loss of fatty tissue; moderate visibility
Month 1
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
10
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
10
Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
8
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
9
Number of Participants With >=1 Point Improvement on the MHGS in Both Hands Following Retreatment at Months 7 and 12Secondary· Months 7 and 12
The MHGS was used to measure clinical efficacy of the Radiesse hand treatments by a masked evaluator performing live, dorsal hand assessments. The MHGS was an ordinal scale; therefore, ratings were made based on a "snap-shot" at a specific study time point. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect was demonstrated by a decrease in MHGS score. MHGS had 5 categories, where: 0 (no loss of fatty tissue); 1 (mild loss of fatty tissue; slight visibility of veins); 2 (moderate loss of fatty tissue; mild visibility of veins and tendons); 3 (severe loss of fatty tissue; moderate visibility
Month 7
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
7
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
4
Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
5
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
3
Percentage of Participants With Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Scores After Initial Treatment at Months 1 and 6Secondary· Months 1 and 6
The GAIS is a 7-point scale. The 7-point scale are as follows: +3 (very much improved); +2 (much improved); +1 (improved); 0 (no change); -1 (worse); -2 (much worse); -3 (very much worse).
Month 1: Left hand (very much improved)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
60.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
60.0
Month 1: Right hand (very much improved)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
60.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
60.0
Month 1: Left hand (much improved)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
10.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
40.0
Month 1: Right hand (much improved)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
10.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
40.0
Month 1: Left hand (improved)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
30.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
0.0
Month 1: Right hand (improved)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
30.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
0.0
Month 1: Left hand (no change)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
0.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
0.0
Month 1: Right hand (no change)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
0.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
0.0
Percentage of Participants With GAIS Scores Following Retreatment at Months 7 and 12Secondary· Months 7 and 12
The GAIS is a 7-point scale. The 7-point scale are as follows: +3 (very much improved); +2 (much improved); +1 (improved); 0 (no change); -1 (worse); -2 (much worse); -3 (very much worse).
Month 7: Left hand (very much improved)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
57.1
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
75.0
Month 7: Right hand (very much improved)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
57.1
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
75.0
Month 7: Left hand (much improved)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
28.6
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
0.0
Month 7: Right hand (much improved)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
28.6
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
0.0
Month 7: Left hand (improved)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
14.3
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
25.0
Month 7: Right hand (improved)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
14.3
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
25.0
Month 7: Left hand (no change)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
0.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
0.0
Month 7: Right hand (no change)
Group
Value
95% CI
Group A: MHGS Grade 4 Hands Group
0.0
Group B: MHGS Grade 2 or 3 Hands Group
0.0
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Baseline up to Month 24.
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The objective of this study is to provide a preliminary assessment of the radiographic appearance of Radiesse material that has been injected into the dorsum of the hands.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Other trials of Radiesse injectable implant and 2% lidocaine HCL
Trials testing the same drug.
NCT02904096 — Radiesse® Safety Study For the Treatment of Hands
· NA
· completed
Other Merz North America, Inc. trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06093815 — Prospective Study to Assess Tissue Responses After Injection With Biostimulatory Products
· NA
· completed
NCT05222607 — Longitudinal Evaluation and Real-world Evidence of NT201
· terminated
NCT05784363 — A Study of NT 201 in the Treatment of Enlarged Pores and Excessive Sebum Production in the Face
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT05163353 — Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Diluted RADIESSE® in the Treatment of Décolleté Wrinkles
· NA
· completed
NCT04886232 — A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparator-controlled, Evaluator-blinded Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effect
· NA
· completed
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Merz North America, Inc.
Last refreshed: 29 November 2023
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02949921.