Adults 40 to 99, any sex, with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Percentage of Participants With IPF SymptomsPrimary· Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
Percentage of participants with IPF symptoms such as cough, fatigue, dizziness, chest pain or any other symptom at 12-month follow up visit. The symptoms in the class 'other' reported upon specific visits were dyspnea, hemoptysis, post-nasal drip, sputum, weight loss, worsening of fatigue and lack of appetite.
Baseline (V1), 3 months (V2), 6 months (V3), 9 months (V4) and 12 months (V5).
More than 1 IPF symptom - V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
88.0
More than 1 IPF symptom - V2
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
51.8
More than 1 IPF symptom - V3
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
49.4
More than 1 IPF symptom - V4
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
42.9
More than 1 IPF symptom - V5
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
45.4
Cough - V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
59.8
Cough - V2
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
38.7
Cough - V3
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
36.6
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Visits in Lung Function: Vital CapacityPrimary· Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
In calculating the change from baseline to all follow-up visits (3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months) in lung function: Vital Capacity (VC), only participants with values available at baseline and at follow up were considered. At follow up visit the absolute changes of lung function assessment vs baseline value was calculated as:
Change in parameter VC = value of parameter VC at follow up visit - value of parameter VC at baseline visit.
A positive value of change indicates a better outcome.
V2-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
0.08
± 0.47
V3-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
0.07
± 0.55
V4-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
0.07
± 0.58
V5-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
0.03
± 0.58
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Visits in Lung Function: Forced Vital Capacity (Actual)Primary· Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
In calculating the change from baseline to follow-up visits in lung function: Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), only participants with values available at baseline and at follow up were considered. At follow up visit the absolute changes of lung function assessment vs baseline value was calculated as:
Change in parameter FVC = value of parameter FVC at follow up visit - value of parameter FVC at baseline visit.
A positive value of change indicates a better outcome.
V2-V1 Actual
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.02
± 0.27
V3-V1 Actual
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.02
± 0.34
V4-V1 Actual
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.02
± 0.31
V5-V1 Actual
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.05
± 0.33
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Visits in Lung Function: Forced Vital Capacity (Predicted)Primary· Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
In calculating the change from baseline to follow-up visits in lung function: Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), only participants with values available at baseline and at follow up were considered. At follow up visit the absolute changes of lung function assessment vs baseline value was calculated as:
Change in parameter FVC = value of parameter FVC at follow up visit - value of parameter FVC at baseline visit.
A positive value of change indicates a better outcome.
The value of FVC % of predicted is a relevant parameter to understand and classify the severity of the disease at the diagnosis and
V2-V1 Predicted
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
0.31
± 8.82
V3-V1 Predicted
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.59
± 8.20
V4-V1 Predicted
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.36
± 9.39
V5-V1 Predicted
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
0.01
± 10.17
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Visits in Lung Function: Forced Expiratory Volume in the 1st SecondPrimary· Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
In calculating the change from baseline to follow-up visits in lung function: Forced Expiratory Volume in the 1st second (FEV1), only participants with values available at baseline and at follow up were considered. At follow up visit the absolute changes of lung function assessment vs baseline value was calculated as:
Change in parameter FEV1 = value of parameter FEV1 at follow up visit - value of parameter FEV1 at baseline visit.
A positive value of change indicates a better outcome.
V2-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
0.01
± 0.21
V3-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.02
± 0.22
V4-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.01
± 0.24
V5-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.02
± 0.28
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Visits in Lung Function: Total Lung CapacityPrimary· Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
In calculating the change from baseline to follow-up visits in lung function: Total Lung Capacity (TLC), only participants with values available at baseline and at follow up were considered. At follow up visit the absolute changes of lung function assessment vs baseline value was calculated as:
Change in parameter TLC = value of parameter TLC at follow up visit - value of parameter TLC at baseline visit.
A positive value of change indicates a better outcome.
V2-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.07
± 0.62
V3-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.05
± 0.72
V4-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.03
± 0.65
V5-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.11
± 0.65
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Visits in Lung Function: Diffusion Capacity for Carbon MonoxidePrimary· Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
In calculating the change from baseline to follow-up visits in lung function: Diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), only participants with values available at baseline and at follow up were considered. At follow up visit the absolute changes of lung function assessment vs baseline value was calculated as:
Change in parameter DLCO = value of parameter DLCO at follow up visit - value of parameter DLCO at baseline visit.
A positive value of change indicates a better outcome.
Values of DLCO with unit = milliliter/minute/millimeter mercury (ml/min/mmHg) were converted to micromole/minut
V2-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.41
± 2.52
V3-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.46
± 2.27
V4-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.34
± 2.97
V5-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.25
± 3.03
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Visits in Lung Function: Partial Pressure of OxygenPrimary· Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
In calculating the change from baseline to follow-up visits in lung function: Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PO2), only participants with values available at baseline and at follow up were considered. At follow up visit the absolute changes of lung function assessment vs baseline value was calculated as:
Change in parameter PO2 = value of parameter PO2 at follow up visit - value of parameter PO2 at baseline visit.
A positive value of change indicates a better outcome.
V2-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.06
± 6.22
V3-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
2.13
± 9.56
V4-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.11
± 9.88
V5-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.47
± 14.05
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Visits in Lung Function: Partial Pressure of Carbon DioxidePrimary· Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
In calculating the change from baseline to follow-up visits in lung function: Partial Pressure of Carbon dioxide (PCO2), only patients with values available at baseline and at follow up were considered. At follow up visit the absolute changes of lung function assessment vs baseline value was calculated as:
Change in parameter PCO2 = value of parameter PCO2 at follow up visit - value of parameter PCO2 at baseline visit.
A positive value of change indicates a better outcome.
V2-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.03
± 3.63
V3-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.59
± 5.36
V4-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.24
± 4.42
V5-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.12
± 3.75
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Visits in Lung Function: Oxygen SaturationPrimary· Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
In calculating the change from baseline to follow-up visits in lung function: Oxygen Saturation (SaO2), only participants with values available at baseline and at follow up were considered. At follow up visit the absolute changes of lung function assessment vs baseline value was calculated as:
Change in parameter SaO2 = value of parameter SaO2 at follow up visit - value of parameter SaO2 at baseline visit.
A positive value of change indicates a better outcome.
V2-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.05
± 2.05
V3-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.33
± 2.23
V4-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.02
± 2.27
V5-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.13
± 2.56
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Visits in Lung Function: Partial Pressure of Oxygen in Arterial Blood at RestPrimary· Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
In calculating the change from baseline to follow-up visits in lung function: Partial Pressure of Oxygen in arterial blood at rest (PaO2), only participants with values available at baseline and at follow up were considered. At follow up visit the absolute changes of lung function assessment vs baseline value was calculated as:
Change in parameter PaO2 = value of parameter PaO2 at follow up visit - value of parameter PaO2 at baseline visit.
A positive value of change indicates a better outcome.
V2-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.03
± 6.78
V3-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
2.74
± 5.44
V4-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
-0.60
± 4.48
V5-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.43
± 4.86
Change From Baseline to Follow-up Visits in Lung Function: Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide in Arterial Blood at RestPrimary· Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
In calculating the change from baseline to follow-up visits in lung function: Partial Pressure of Carbon dioxide in arterial blood at rest (PaCO2), only participants with values available at baseline and at follow up were considered. At follow up visit the absolute changes of lung function assessment vs baseline value was calculated as:
Change in parameter PaCO2 = value of parameter PaCO2 at follow up visit - value of parameter PaCO2 at baseline visit.
A positive value of change indicates a better outcome.
V2-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.12
± 2.98
V3-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.61
± 2.63
V4-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
0.65
± 2.99
V5-V1
Group
Value
95% CI
Participants With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
1.27
± 4.20
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: For serious adverse event (SAE) and Non-SAE: From IPF diagnosis until the end of observation period, up to 12 months. For All-cause mortality: From signing informed consent until the end of observation period, up to 493 days..
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the characteristics, management and clinical course of patients with IPF as treated under real-world in Italian Pulmonary Centres, in terms of symptoms, lung function and exercise tolerance during 12 months of observation.
Publications & conference data
2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Other recruiting trials for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT05988463 — Dose-Escalation Study of Artesunate Patients With IPF
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT06241560 — A Study in People With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis to Test Whether Pirfenidone Influences the Amount of BI 1015550 in
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07407543 — A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of SRN001 in Healthy Korean and Cauc
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07036523 — A Study to Find Out Whether BI 765423 Has an Effect on Lung Function in People With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07225296 — A Single and Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics o
· Phase 1
· recruiting
Other Boehringer Ingelheim trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07044700 — Real-world Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Jardiance in Chinese Patients With Heart Failure of Reduced Ejection
· not yet recruiting
NCT07047508 — Real-world Study to Describe the Effectiveness and Safety Outcomes of Jardiance in Chinese Patients With Heart Failure a
· not yet recruiting
NCT07366034 — A Study to Find Out How Nerandomilast is Tolerated, Handled by the Body, and if it Helps Children and Adolescents With I
· Phase 3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07531628 — A Study to Test How Verducatib is Taken up in the Body of Healthy Chinese Participants
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT07497087 — A Study to Test Whether Nerandomilast Helps People With Systemic Sclerosis
· Phase 3
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Boehringer Ingelheim
Last refreshed: 13 September 2019
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02803580.