18 and older, any sex, with Arthritis, Rheumatoid. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change From Baseline in Target Engagement Biomarkers- Soluble Granulocyte-macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) Complexed to GSK3196165Primary· Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12-Week follow-up (FU) (Week 22)
Blood samples were collected for markers which may influence rheumatoid arthritis. Target engagement biomarkers included soluble GM-CSF complexed to GSK3196165. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for GM-CSF - Complex log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (\<=2 or \>2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Analysis was performed on Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population which consisted of all participants who were randomized
GM-CSF - Complex, Week 1, n=9, 27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.972
± 35.98
GSK3196165 180 mg
13.799
± 20.65
GM-CSF - Complex, Week 2, n=8, 26
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.960
± 31.23
GSK3196165 180 mg
31.056
± 17.58
GM-CSF - Complex, Week 4, n=8, 27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.959
± 34.51
GSK3196165 180 mg
53.496
± 18.55
GM-CSF - Complex, Week 6, n=7, 26
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.964
± 40.96
GSK3196165 180 mg
46.620
± 22.37
GM-CSF - Complex, Week 8, n=7, 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.964
± 41.80
GSK3196165 180 mg
33.404
± 22.47
GM-CSF - Complex, Week 12, n=7, 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.970
± 44.95
GSK3196165 180 mg
22.556
± 24.38
GM-CSF - Complex, 12-Week FU, n=8, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.954
± 20.80
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.176
± 12.88
Change From Baseline in Predictive Biomarkers: 14-3-3 ETA Protein, S100 Calcium Binding Protein (CBP) A8 and A9Primary· Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22)
Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Predictive biomarkers included analysis of 14-3-3 ETA Protein, S100 CBP A8 and A9. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for 14-3-3 ETA Protein (mg/L) and S100 CBP A8 and A9 log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (\<=2 or \>2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data availab
14-3-3 ETA Protein, Week 1, n=9, 27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.046
± 3.88
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.986
± 2.16
14-3-3 ETA Protein, Week 2, n=8, 26
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.959
± 12.14
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.986
± 6.70
14-3-3 ETA Protein, Week 4, n=9, 26
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.128
± 16.59
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.838
± 9.55
14-3-3 ETA Protein, Week 6, n=7, 26
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.093
± 15.55
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.833
± 8.88
14-3-3 ETA Protein, Week 8, n=7, 23
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.950
± 15.19
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.842
± 8.48
14-3-3 ETA Protein, Week 12, n=7, 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.131
± 20.90
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.897
± 11.89
14-3-3 ETA Protein, 12-Week FU, n=7, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.040
± 24.06
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.893
± 13.45
S100 CBP A8 and A9, Week 1, n=9, 27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.940
± 15.20
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.939
± 8.92
Change From Baseline in Predictive Biomarkers: Amyloid APrimary· Baseline and Week 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22)
Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Predictive biomarkers included analysis of Amyloid A. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for Amyloid A log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (\<=2 or \>2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X i
Amyloid A, Week 12, n=7, 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.845
± 49.31
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.653
± 25.45
Amyloid A, 12-Week FU, n=7, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.529
± 35.12
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.623
± 19.68
Change From Baseline in Predictive Biomarkers: Amyloid A, Chemokine (C-C Motif) Ligand 17, Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 13, Interleukin 6, Macrophage-Derived ChemokinePrimary· Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22)
Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Predictive biomarkers included analysis of Chemokine (C-C Motif) Ligand 17 (CL17), Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand 13 (CL13), Interleukin 6, Macrophage-Derived Chemokine (MDC). Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for CL17, CL13, Interleukin 6, MDC log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (\<=2 or \>2 years), visit and trea
CL17, Week 1, n=9, 27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.117
± 18.81
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.773
± 10.94
CL17, Week 2, n=8, 26
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.912
± 24.37
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.651
± 13.60
CL17, Week 4, n=9, 27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.117
± 21.91
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.679
± 12.51
CL17, Week 6, n=7, 27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.032
± 24.38
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.779
± 12.48
CL17, Week 8, n=7, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.211
± 20.63
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.675
± 11.21
CL17, Week 12, n=7, 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.711
± 24.96
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.890
± 13.90
CL17, 12-Week FU, n=7, 20
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.434
± 23.26
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.357
± 13.59
CL13, Week 1, n=9, 27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.198
± 15.63
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.915
± 8.87
Change From Baseline in Predictive Biomarkers: Chitinase 3 Like 1, Matrix Metalloproteinase 3 (MMP-3)Primary· Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22)
Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Predictive biomarkers included analysis of Chitinase 3 Like 1 and MMP-3. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for Chitinase 3 Like 1 and MMP-3 log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (\<=2 or \>2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data point
Chitinase 3 Like 1, Week 1, n=9, 27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.033
± 13.97
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.917
± 8.13
Chitinase 3 Like 1, Week 2, n=8, 26
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.013
± 15.05
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.966
± 8.55
Chitinase 3 Like 1, Week 4, n=9, 27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.961
± 17.14
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.088
± 9.96
Chitinase 3 Like 1, Week 6, n=7, 27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.897
± 17.08
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.031
± 8.80
Chitinase 3 Like 1, Week 8, n=7, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.851
± 18.24
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.947
± 9.70
Chitinase 3 Like 1, Week 12, n=7, 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.066
± 21.53
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.071
± 11.64
Chitinase 3 Like 1, 12-Week FU, n=7, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.735
± 16.87
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.019
± 9.75
MMP 3, Week 1, n=9, 27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.076
± 6.72
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.984
± 3.88
Change From Baseline in Cartilage BiomarkersPrimary· Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22)
Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers that may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Cartilage biomarkers included analysis of ARGS Neo-Epitope, Citrullinated MMP-Degraded Vimentin (CMDV), MMP-Degraded C Reactive Protein (CRP), MMP-Degraded Type I Collagen (MD1C), MMP-Degraded Type II Collagen (MD2C), MMP-Degraded Type III Collagen (MD3C). Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for ARGS Neo-Epitope, Citrullinated MMP-Degra
ARGS Neo-Epitope, Week 1, n=9, 27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.979
± 16.10
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.075
± 9.67
ARGS Neo-Epitope, Week 2, n=8, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.790
± 17.38
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.249
± 9.87
ARGS Neo-Epitope, Week 4, n=8, 26
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.904
± 17.02
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.104
± 10.05
ARGS Neo-Epitope, Week 6, n=6, 26
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.894
± 14.28
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.164
± 7.82
ARGS Neo-Epitope, Week 8, n=7, 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.854
± 26.42
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.238
± 14.20
ARGS Neo-Epitope, Week 12, n=7, 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.913
± 13.97
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.156
± 7.78
ARGS Neo-Epitope, 12-Week FU, n=8, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.129
± 17.44
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.124
± 9.86
CMDV, Week 1,n=9,27
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.981
± 24.12
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.876
± 13.80
Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry: Helper/Suppressor CellsPrimary· Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22)
Whole blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Flow cytometry assessment included assessment of Helper/Suppressor. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for Helper/Suppressor log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (\<=2 or \>2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were ana
Helper/Suppressor, Week 1, n=8, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.024
± 6.98
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.976
± 4.00
Helper/Suppressor, Week 4, n=8, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.053
± 7.18
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.998
± 4.11
Helper/Suppressor, Week 12, n=6, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.040
± 6.83
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.088
± 3.49
Helper/Suppressor, 12-Week FU, n=6, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.051
± 8.99
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.065
± 4.88
Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry: 6 Colour TB Natural Killer (NK) Panel- CD16+CD56+, CD19, CD3, CD3+CD4+Primary· Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22)
Whole blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Flow cytometry assessment included assessment of cluster of differentiation (CD)16+CD56+, CD19, CD3, CD3+CD4+. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Repeated measures analysis adjusted for CD16+CD56+, CD19, CD3, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+ and T Cell B Cell NKL log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (\<=2 or \>2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participan
CD16+CD56+, Week 1, n=8, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.989
± 11.39
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.025
± 6.30
CD16+CD56+, Week 4, n=8, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.163
± 12.97
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.951
± 7.25
CD16+CD56+, Week 12, n=6, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.193
± 15.49
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.911
± 7.81
CD16+CD56+, 12-Week FU, n=6, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.298
± 15.10
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.920
± 7.98
CD19, Week 1, n=8, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.880
± 11.05
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.984
± 6.23
CD19, Week 4, n=8, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.090
± 15.31
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.971
± 8.60
CD19, Week 12, n=6, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.054
± 12.26
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.003
± 6.51
CD19, Week 22, n=6, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.980
± 17.75
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.938
± 9.75
Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry: 6 Colour TBNK Panel- CD3+CD8+ and T Cell B Cell Natural Killer Lymphocytes (NKL)Primary· Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22)
Whole blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Flow cytometry assessment included assessment of CD3+CD8+ and T Cell B Cell NKL. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose value from the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for CD3+CD8+ and T Cell B Cell NKL log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (\<=2 or \>2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with data availabl
CD3+CD8+, Week 1, n=8, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-0.041
± 0.0390
GSK3196165 180 mg
-0.005
± 0.0222
CD3+CD8+, Week 4, n=8, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.000
± 0.0580
GSK3196165 180 mg
-0.023
± 0.0327
CD3+CD8+, Week 12, n=6, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-0.056
± 0.0418
GSK3196165 180 mg
-0.037
± 0.0215
CD3+CD8+, 12-Week FU, n=6, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-0.060
± 0.0506
GSK3196165 180 mg
-0.027
± 0.0279
T Cell B Cell NKL, Week 1, n=8, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-0.123
± 0.1557
GSK3196165 180 mg
-0.020
± 0.0881
T Cell B Cell NKL, Week 4, n=8, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.108
± 0.2174
GSK3196165 180 mg
-0.050
± 0.1229
T Cell B Cell NKL, Week 12, n=6, 25
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-0.093
± 0.1792
GSK3196165 180 mg
-0.006
± 0.0925
T Cell B Cell NKL, 12-Week FU, n=6, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-0.029
± 0.2168
GSK3196165 180 mg
-0.050
± 0.1183
Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry: T Regulatory (Reg) Cell Foxp3- CD3+ CD4+, CD3+ CD8+ and CD3+Primary· Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22)
Whole blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Flow cytometry assessment included assessment of CD3+ CD4+, CD3+ CD8+ and CD3+. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as ratio of Baseline value to post-dose value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for CD3+ CD4+, CD3+ CD8+ and CD3+ Number of Cells (10\^6/L) log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (\<=2 or \>2 years), visit and treatment group by visit interaction. Only those participants with da
CD3+ CD4+, Week 1, n=7, 23
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.905
± 10.21
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.007
± 5.65
CD3+ CD4+, Week 4, n=7, 22
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.038
± 11.31
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.976
± 6.38
CD3+ CD4+, Week 12, n=5, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.981
± 10.55
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.004
± 5.31
CD3+ CD4+, 12-Week FU, n=5, 17
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.926
± 11.70
GSK3196165 180 mg
1.003
± 6.39
CD3+ CD8+, Week 1, n=7, 23
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.885
± 9.97
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.983
± 5.50
CD3+ CD8+, Week 4, n=7, 22
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.981
± 11.89
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.939
± 6.66
CD3+ CD8+, Week 12, n=5, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.878
± 10.50
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.945
± 5.40
CD3+ CD8+, 12-Week FU, n=5, 17
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.936
± 10.99
GSK3196165 180 mg
0.965
± 6.05
Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry: T Reg Cell Foxp3: CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127-, CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127-Primary· Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22)
Whole blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Flow cytometry assessment included assessment of CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127- and CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127-. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose value from the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis adjusted for CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127- and CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127-Number of Cells (10\^6 cells/L) log(Baseline value), treatment group, disease duration (\<=2 or \>2 years), visit and treatment g
CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127-, Week 1, n=7, 23
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-3.6
± 8.35
GSK3196165 180 mg
2.9
± 4.67
CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127-, Week 4, n=7, 22
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.4
± 8.34
GSK3196165 180 mg
-0.4
± 4.70
CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127-, Week 12, n=5, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-9.4
± 9.87
GSK3196165 180 mg
-3.1
± 4.94
CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127-, 12-Week FU, n=5, 17
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-12.9
± 9.92
GSK3196165 180 mg
-2.3
± 5.43
CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127, Week 1, n=7, 23
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.8
± 6.39
GSK3196165 180 mg
2.8
± 3.58
CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127, Week 4, n=7, 22
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
4.3
± 7.05
GSK3196165 180 mg
2.0
± 3.98
CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127, Week 12, n=5, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
2.7
± 7.99
GSK3196165 180 mg
-4.4
± 3.91
CD3+CD4+foxP3+CD25+CD127,12-Week FU, n=5,17
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-8.7
± 5.94
GSK3196165 180 mg
-4.6
± 3.15
Change From Baseline in T Helper Cell Panel EventsPrimary· Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 12, 12-Week FU (Week 22)
Blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers which may be predictive of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. T Helper Cell Panel included analysis of CD45+3+8-4+CCR6+CXCR3+38+DR+, CD45+3+8-4+CCR6+CXCR3-38+DR+, CD45+3+8-4+CCR6-CXCR3+38+DR+, CD45+3+8-4+CCR6-CXCR3-38+DR+, CD45+CD3+CD8-CD4+, CD45+CD3+CD8-CD4+CCR6+CXCR3+, CD45+CD3+CD8-CD4+CCR6+CXCR3-, CD45+CD3+CD8-CD4+CCR6-CXCR3+ and CD45+CD3+CD8-CD4+CCR6-CXCR3-. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose value from the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using repeated measures ana
CD45+3+8-4+CCR6+CXCR3+38+DR+, Week 1, n=7, 23
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-48.6
± 13.50
GSK3196165 180 mg
-34.0
± 7.35
CD45+3+8-4+CCR6+CXCR3+38+DR+, Week 4, n=7, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-14.5
± 18.36
GSK3196165 180 mg
-6.1
± 10.63
CD45+3+8-4+CCR6+CXCR3+38+DR+, Week 12, n=5, 22
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
42.3
± 37.80
GSK3196165 180 mg
-6.9
± 17.69
CD45+3+8-4+CCR6+CXCR3+38+DR+,12-Week FU,n=5,18
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
11.5
± 16.47
GSK3196165 180 mg
-18.7
± 8.66
CD45+3+8-4+CCR6+CXCR3-38+DR+, Week 1, n=7, 23
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-17.0
± 6.80
GSK3196165 180 mg
-10.5
± 3.62
CD45+3+8-4+CCR6+CXCR3-38+DR+, Week 4, n=7, 21
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
14.2
± 15.65
GSK3196165 180 mg
12.2
± 9.10
CD45+3+8-4+CCR6+CXCR3-38+DR+, Week 12, n=5, 22
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
3.4
± 16.09
GSK3196165 180 mg
-3.0
± 7.55
CD45+3+8-4+CCR6+CXCR3-38+DR+, 12-Week FU, n=5, 18
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
8.9
± 12.29
GSK3196165 180 mg
3.3
± 6.36
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: AEs and SAEs were collected from start of study treatment up to 12-Week FU (Week 22)..
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
This study is designed to explore the activity of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) signaling pathway in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the potential impact of inhibition of this axis by GSK3196165, and to evaluate whether there are any differences in the GM-CSF axis between subjects with early RA compared with those with more established disease. This study also aims to establish the potential impact of GSK3196165 on inflammatory structural joint damage in the hand/wrist using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This is a randomized Phase IIa, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study. Approximately 40 subjects with active RA despite treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (including conventional or biologic) will be randomized into the study, following a screening period of up to 6 weeks. The total treatment period is up to 10 weeks, with a 12-week follow-up period after the last dose (Week 22).
Publications & conference data
8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT02683785 — A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 in Inflammatory Hand Osteoarthritis
· Phase 2
· completed
NCT02504671 — Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 Plus Methotrexate in Subjects With Active Moderate-Severe Rheuma
· Phase 2
· completed
Other recruiting trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07176390 — A Clinical Study of Tulisokibart (MK-7240) to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (MK-7240-014)
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06842316 — Effects of Phytocannabinoids on Immune Response and Autophagy During Chronic Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases
· recruiting
NCT06528431 — Design and Evaluation of an Individualized Biodrug Tapering Strategy Based on Biodrug Dosage: the MONITORA Study
· Phase 4
· recruiting
NCT06492200 — Impact of a High-fiber Diet on the Microbiome and Disease Activity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06246123 — A Study of Jyseleca Tablet (Filgotinib Maleate) in Korean Participants
· recruiting
Other GlaxoSmithKline trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07569081 — A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Momelotinib in Participants With Vacuoles, E1-enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflam
· Phase 2, PHASE3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07406347 — A Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Reactogenicity of an Investigational Pneumococcal Vaccine in Infants Receiving 3-dose
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT07286266 — A Study to Investigate GSK5733584 Compared With Chemotherapy in Participants With Platinum-resistant Ovarian Cancer (BEH
· Phase 3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07286331 — A Study to Investigate GSK5733584 Compared With Chemotherapy in Participants With Recurrent Endometrial Cancer (BEHOLD-E
· Phase 3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07406334 — A Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Reactogenicity of an Investigational Pneumococcal Vaccine in Toddlers 12 to 15 Months
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by GlaxoSmithKline
Last refreshed: 11 January 2021
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02799472.