50 and older, any sex, with Dementia, Alzheimer Type. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
ADAS-Cog v14Primary· Baseline, Week 12
Change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scales - Cognitive Subscale Score, version 14 (ADAS-Cog v14) Total scores of ADAS Cog 14 range from 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Group
Value
95% CI
Xanamem™
-1.5
± 6.47
Placebo
-0.7
± 6.65
AD COMposite ScoresPrimary· Baseline, Week 12
Change in AD COMposite Scores (ADCOMs- ADCOMs, composite score is derived from a weighted linear combination of items from commonly used outcome scales Cognitive Subscale Version 14 \[ADAS-Cog v14\], Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes \[CDR-SOB\], and Mini-Mental Status Examination \[MMSE\]. Th ADCOMs range: 0 - 1.97, whereas a lover score is interpreted as a better result.
Included scales:
ADAS-Cog v14 (range: 0-90): A lower score is indicative of better cognition, a higher score indicates higher cognitive impairment.
CDR-SOB (range: 0-18): A lower score is indicative of better
Group
Value
95% CI
Xanamem™
0.02472
± 0.144135
Placebo
0.01908
± 0.151502
RAVLTSecondary· Baseline, Week 12
Change in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) RAVLT will be administered using five trials, with individual scores from 0-15. The total score is the combined score of all five trials, ranging from 0 to 75, whereas a lower score is considered a worse outcome and a higher score a better outcome.
Recall List A - Total number of correct words
Group
Value
95% CI
Xanamem™
0.3
± 6.54
Placebo
0.4
± 6.31
Recall List B - Number of correct words
Group
Value
95% CI
Xanamem™
0.3
± 1.63
Placebo
0.1
± 1.30
Final recall of List A - Number of correct words
Group
Value
95% CI
Xanamem™
0.2
± 3.14
Placebo
0.4
± 2.40
CDR-SOBSecondary· Baseline, Week 12
Change in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) The CDR is obtained through semi-structured interviews of patients and informants, and cognitive functioning is rated in six domains of functioning: memory, orientation, judgement and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care.
Each domain is rated on a five-point scale of functioning as follows: 0, no impairment; 0.5, questionable impairment; 1, mild impairment; 2, moderate impairment; and 3, severe impairment.
The CDR-SOB is based on summing each of the domain box scores, with scores ranging from
Group
Value
95% CI
Xanamem™
0.25
± 1.276
Placebo
0.16
± 1.325
MMSESecondary· Baseline, Week 12
Change in Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) MMSE total score (0 - 30) is a sum of all 30 point questionnaire of MMSE. A score of 20 to 24 suggests mild dementia, 13 to 20 suggests moderate dementia, and less than 12 indicates severe dementia.
Change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) The NPI includes questions to ten behavioural and two neurodegenerative domains.
Raters recorded neuropsychiatric symptoms using a 1-4 scale for frequency and a 1-3 scale for severity for each item in the instrument, with the score for each domain being: domain score = frequency x severity.
The total score is calculated by adding the scores of the first 10 domain scores.
The two neurodegenerative items are not included in the NPI total score as they form part of the depression syndrome in some patients and were specifically excluded from the dyspho
Change in Neuropsychological Test Batteries (NTB) - Executive Domains: Controlled Oral Word Association - Test (COWAT) and Total Correct Response (CFT) Total NTB score is the sum of COWAT and CFT. During the COWAT test, the subject is asked to mention as many words as possible beginning with different letters (F, A, S) within 1 minute each. The number of words for each letter is recorded, the score is the sum of all words. There is no minimum or maximum score, whereas more words indicate a better outcome.
During the CFT test, the subject is given 1 minute to produce as many unique words as po
COWAT Total Correct Words
Group
Value
95% CI
Xanamem™
0.5
± 8.08
Placebo
0.5
± 8.12
CTF Total Correct Responses
Group
Value
95% CI
Xanamem™
0.3
± 8.53
Placebo
-0.7
± 6.28
NTB Total Score
Group
Value
95% CI
Xanamem™
0.8
± 11.50
Placebo
-0.2
± 9.84
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Median treatment duration (weeks) was 12 weeks (range: 0.14, 13.0 weeks) for subjects in the Xanamem group and 12 weeks (range: 0.14, 13.1 weeks) for subjects in the placebo group..
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
This XanADu Phase II study in mild Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of Xanamem in subjects with mild dementia due to Alzheimer's Disease. Subjects will be randomized to receive either 10mg once daily Xanamem or Placebo at a 1:1 ratio in a double-blinded fashion.
Publications & conference data
8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Actinogen Medical
Last refreshed: 3 February 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02727699.