Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT02713529

Safety and Efficacy Study of AMG 820 and Pembrolizumab Combination in Select Advanced Solid Tumor Cancer

Completed Phase 1, PHASE2 Results posted Last updated 20 January 2023
What this trial tests

Phase 1, PHASE2 trial testing AMG820 and pembrolizumab in Pancreatic Cancer in 117 participants. Completed in 17 May 2019.

Timeline
14 April 2016
Primary endpoint
2 January 2019
17 May 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsorAmMax Bio, Inc.
PhasePhase 1, PHASE2
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment117
Start date14 April 2016
Primary completion2 January 2019
Estimated completion17 May 2019
Sites15 locations across Belgium, Germany, Canada, Australia, United States, Spain

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

AmMax Bio, Inc. — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Pancreatic Cancer or Colorectal Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) Primary · The DLT evaluation period was Day 1 to Day 21

DLTs were evaluated by the Dose Level Review Team (DLRT). A DLT was defined as any grade \>=3 adverse event occurring during a DLT time window (21 day period from the initial administration of AMG 820 and pembrolizumab in combination), and if judged by the investigator to be related to the administration of AMG 820 and/or pembrolizumab.

Participants with treatment emergent DLTs
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg1
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient3
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer2
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low1
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High0
DLT: Autoimmune pancreatitis
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg1
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient0
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer0
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low0
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High0
DLT: Autoimmune hepatitis
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg1
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient0
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer0
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low0
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High0
DLT: Cholecystitis
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg1
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient0
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer0
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low0
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High0
DLT: Electrolyte imbalance
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg1
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient0
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer0
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low0
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High0
DLT: Fatigue
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient1
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer0
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low0
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High0
DLT: Aspartate aminotransferase increased
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient1
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer1
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low0
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High0
DLT: Lipase increased
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient0
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer0
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low1
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High0
Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Primary · Day 1 up to 207 days for Part 1 and Day 1 up to 572 days for Part 2

TEAEs include any adverse event starting on or after the first dose of AMG 820 or pembrolizumab. Relation to study drugs was determined by the investigator. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by the investigator according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0, where Grade 1 = mild AE, Grade 2 = moderate AE, Grade 3 = severe AE, Grade 4 = life-threatening AE, and Grade 5 = death due to AE. Errors in the case report form design resulted in investigators misunderstanding the CTCAE definition for severity grade 5. Therefore data are not repo

>=1 TEAE
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg8
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg7
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient41
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer31
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve4
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low19
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High6
Grade >=3
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg7
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg7
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient40
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer30
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve4
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low19
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High6
Grade >=4
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg2
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg4
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient24
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer26
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve2
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low12
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High4
Grade >=5
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mgNA
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mgNA
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficientNA
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic CancerNA
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, NaïveNA
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 LowNA
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 HighNA
Serious AE
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg5
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg2
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient31
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer23
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve3
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low11
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High5
Leading to interruption of AMG 820
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg4
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg3
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient23
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer7
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve1
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low7
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High2
Leading to discontinuation AMG 820
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient6
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer5
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve2
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low1
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High3
---- SAE leading to d/c AMG 820
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient4
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer4
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve1
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low0
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High2
Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Related to AMG 820 Treatment Primary · Day 1 up to 207 days for Part 1; Day 1 up to 572 days for Part 2

TEAEs include any adverse event starting on or after the first dose of AMG 820 or pembrolizumab. Relation to study drugs was determined by the investigator. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by the investigator according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0, where Grade 1 = mild AE, Grade 2 = moderate AE, Grade 3 = severe AE, Grade 4 = life-threatening AE, and Grade 5 = death due to AE. Errors in the case report form design resulted in investigators misunderstanding the CTCAE definition for severity grade 5. Therefore data are not repo

>=1 TEAE
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg5
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg7
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient41
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer25
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve4
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low14
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High6
Grade >=3
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg3
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg5
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient28
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer11
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve1
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low10
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High6
Grade >=4
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg1
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg1
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient5
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer5
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low2
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High2
Grade >=5
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mgNA
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mgNA
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficientNA
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic CancerNA
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, NaïveNA
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 LowNA
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 HighNA
Serious AE
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg2
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg2
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient12
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer4
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low3
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High3
Leading to interruption of AMG 820
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg2
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg3
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient16
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer7
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low5
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High2
Leading to discontinuation AMG 820
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient3
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer3
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve1
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low0
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High3
---- SAE leading to d/c AMG 820
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient3
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer2
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low0
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High2
Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Related to Pembrolizumab Treatment Primary · Day 1 up to 207 days for Part 1 and Day 1 up to 572 days for Part 2

TEAEs include any adverse event starting on or after the first dose of AMG 820 or pembrolizumab. Relation to study drugs was determined by the investigator. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by the investigator according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0, where Grade 1 = mild AE, Grade 2 = moderate AE, Grade 3 = severe AE, Grade 4 = life-threatening AE, and Grade 5 = death due to AE. Errors in the case report form design resulted in investigators misunderstanding the CTCAE definition for severity grade 5. Therefore data are not repo

>=1 TEAE
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg5
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg7
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient39
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer24
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve4
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low13
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High6
Grade >=3
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg2
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg5
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient29
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer9
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve1
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low10
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High4
Grade >=4
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg1
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg1
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient5
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer4
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low2
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High2
Grade >=5
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mgNA
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mgNA
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficientNA
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic CancerNA
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, NaïveNA
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 LowNA
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 HighNA
Serious AE
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg2
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg2
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient16
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer5
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low3
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High4
Leading to interruption of PEM
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg1
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg3
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient15
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer6
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low5
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High2
Leading to discontinuation AMG 820
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient4
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer2
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve1
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low1
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High3
---- SAE leading to d/c AMG 820
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1, Cohort 2: AMG 820 1100 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 1, Cohort 1: AMG 820 1400 mg + Pem 200 mg0
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient3
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer1
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low0
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High2
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Immune-Related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) Primary · Baseline: Day -28; Treatment: up to Month 13.7

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response or partial response assessed by the investigator using immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST). Response was based on the size of tumors assessed by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). During treatment radiographic imaging was performed at Week 10 and repeated at least every 10 weeks until disease progression. Complete response (iCR): Disappearance of all lesions (whether measurable or not and whether baseline or new) and confirmation by

GroupValue95% CI
Part 1: AMG 820 + Pem0.00.00 – 0.00
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient4.90.60 – 16.53
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer0.00.0 – 0.0
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0.00.0 – 0.0
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low5.30.13 – 26.03
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High0.00.0 – 0.0
Time to Response (TTR) Per Immune-Related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) For Participants Who Responded Secondary · Day 1 up to Month 16 (max time to censoring)

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose of AMG 820 until first documented complete or partial response per irRECIST divided by 365.25 days/12.

GroupValue95% CI
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient2.15872.004 – 2.168
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low2.0698NA – NA
Time to Progression (TTP) for Participants Who Had Progressive Disease Secondary · Day 1 up to 14.4 months (max time to censoring)

Time to progression was defined as the time from first dose of AMG 820 until first documented progressive disease per irRECIST divided by 365.25 days/12.

GroupValue95% CI
Part 1: AMG 820 + Pem2.18650.460 – 5.552
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient3.06910.559 – 8.411
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer2.38780.296 – 4.698
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve4.67622.070 – 6.604
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low6.08631.150 – 11.992
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High7.78641.938 – 13.667
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS) at Month 6 and Month 12 Secondary · Day 1 up to Month 6 or Month 12

Overall survival time was calculated as the number of days from the first administration of AMG 820 to date of death or censoring divided by (365.25/12). Data are reported as the percentage of participants who were alive at Month 6 and Month 12.

Month 6
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1: AMG 820 + Pem 200 mg59.07732.25 – 78.28
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient53.91540.00 – 63.93
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer16.7057.40 – 29.24
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve75.00022.34 – 94.63
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low52.10531.91 – 68.93
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High41.6679.26 – 72.47
Month 12
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1: AMG 820 + Pem 200 mg47.26221.19 – 69.63
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient38.96325.77 – 51.94
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer8.3532.22 – 19.81
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve25.002.08 – 60.89
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low34.73717.37 – 52.79
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High41.6679.26 – 72.47
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per irRECIST at Month 6 and Month 12 Secondary · Day 1 up to Month 6 or Month 12

Progression-free survival time was calculated as the number of days from the first administration of AMG 820 to date of progressive disease or death or censoring divided by (365.25/12). Data are reported as the percentage of participants who were alive and progression-free at Month 6 and Month 12.

Month 6
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1: AMG 820 + Pem 200 mg10.4761.23 – 31.40
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient13.4905.99 – 24.04
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer0.0000.00 – 0.00
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve25.0002.08 – 60.89
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low26.47110.67 – 45.41
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High33.3337.37 – 62.95
Month 12
GroupValue95% CI
Part 1: AMG 820 + Pem 200 mg0.0000.00 – 0.00
Part 2, Group 1: CRC MMR-proficient5.3961.36 – 13.77
Part 2, Group 2: Pancreatic Cancer0.0000.00 – 0.00
Part 2, Group 3: NSCLC PD-L1 Low, Naïve0.0000.00 – 0.00
Part 2, Group 4a: Refractory / Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 Low6.6180.77 – 21.97
Part 2, Group 4b: Refractory/Relapsing NSCLC PD-L1 High33.3337.37 – 62.95
AMG 820 Pharmacokinetic Parameter by Dose Group: Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) During Treatment Cycles 1 + 2 Secondary · Cycle 1, Study Day 1: pre-infusion, at end of infusion, hours 1, 6 and 24 post infusion, Days 5, 8 and 15. Cycle 2, Study Day 22: pre-infusion, at end of infusion, hours 1, 6, 24 post infusion, Days 26, 29 and 36
Cycle 1
GroupValue95% CI
AMG 820 1100 mg2.01.0 – 170
AMG 820 1400 mg2.01.0 – 7.0
Cycle 2
GroupValue95% CI
AMG 820 1100 mg3.001.00 – 25.0
AMG 820 1400 mg2.001.00 – 25.0
AMG 820 Pharmacokinetic Parameter by Dose Group: Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Cmax) During Treatment Cycles 1 + 2 Secondary · Cycle 1, Study Day 1: pre-infusion, at end of infusion, hours 1, 6 and 24 post infusion, Days 5, 8 and 15. Cycle 2, Study Day 22: pre-infusion, at end of infusion, hours 1, 6, 24 post infusion, Days 26, 29 and 36
Cycle 1
GroupValue95% CI
AMG 820 1100 mg331± 27
AMG 820 1400 mg485± 23
Cycle 2
GroupValue95% CI
AMG 820 1100 mg363± 32
AMG 820 1400 mg536± 21
AMG 820 Pharmacokinetic Parameter by Dose Group: Area Under the Curve Last (AUClast) During Treatment Cycles 1 + 2 Secondary · Cycle 1, Study Day 1: pre-infusion, at end of infusion, hours 1, 6 and 24 post infusion, Days 5, 8 and 15. Cycle 2, Study Day 22: pre-infusion, at end of infusion, hours 1, 6, 24 post infusion, Days 26, 29 and 36

AUClast is the area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration.

Cycle 1
GroupValue95% CI
AMG 820 1100 mg55100± 37
AMG 820 1400 mg80400± 33
Cycle 2
GroupValue95% CI
AMG 820 1100 mg55200± 38
AMG 820 1400 mg73500± 45

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: The TEAE timeframe was Day 1 up to 207 days for Part 1 and Day 1 up to 572 days for Part 2. The median time frame is 122 days.. Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

AMG 820 1100 MG
Serious: 70/98 (71%)
Deaths: 12/98
AMG 820 1400 MG
Serious: 10/18 (56%)
Deaths: 1/18

Serious adverse events (107 terms)

ReactionSystemAMG 820 1100 MGAMG 820 1400 MG
PyrexiaGeneral disorders
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
AstheniaGeneral disorders
Bile duct obstructionHepatobiliary disorders
Device related infectionInfections and infestations
PneumoniaInfections and infestations
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rash maculo-papularSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders
FatigueGeneral disorders
HepatitisHepatobiliary disorders
CellulitisInfections and infestations
Lung infectionInfections and infestations
Transaminases increasedInvestigations
HypercalcaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
HyperkalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Colorectal cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-small cell lung cancer metastaticNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders
Other adverse events (126 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemAMG 820 1100 MGAMG 820 1400 MG
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations
FatigueGeneral disorders
Periorbital oedemaEye disorders
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders
PyrexiaGeneral disorders
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
Amylase increasedInvestigations
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Lipase increasedInvestigations
HypophosphataemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
HypertensionVascular disorders
Face oedemaGeneral disorders
Rash maculo-papularSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Blood alkaline phosphatase increasedInvestigations
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
HyponatraemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
ChillsGeneral disorders
HypoalbuminaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
HeadacheNervous system disorders
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders
HypomagnesaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pancreatic carcinoma metastaticNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders
AstheniaGeneral disorders
Candida infectionInfections and infestations
Transaminases increasedInvestigations
Musculoskeletal painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
HaematuriaRenal and urinary disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Pyrexia, Urinary tract infection, Pleural effusion, Anaemia, Abdominal pain, Asthenia, Bile duct obstruction, Device related infection.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02713529 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

A multi-center Phase 1b/2 study testing the combination of AMG 820 and pembrolizumab in subjects with select advanced solid tumors.

Publications & conference data

8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Inflammation and tumor progression: signaling pathways and targeted intervention.
    Zhao H, Wu L, Yan G, Chen Y, et al · · 2021 · cited 1932× · PMID 34248142 · DOI 10.1038/s41392-021-00658-5
  2. Macrophages as regulators of tumour immunity and immunotherapy.
    DeNardo DG, Ruffell B. · · 2019 · cited 1903× · PMID 30718830 · DOI 10.1038/s41577-019-0127-6
  3. Macrophages as tools and targets in cancer therapy.
    Mantovani A, Allavena P, Marchesi F, Garlanda C. · · 2022 · cited 1279× · PMID 35974096 · DOI 10.1038/s41573-022-00520-5
  4. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibitors in cancer therapy.
    Cannarile MA, Weisser M, Jacob W, Jegg AM, et al · · 2017 · cited 796× · PMID 28716061 · DOI 10.1186/s40425-017-0257-y
  5. Targeting tumor-associated macrophages to synergize tumor immunotherapy.
    Xiang X, Wang J, Lu D, Xu X. · · 2021 · cited 712× · PMID 33619259 · DOI 10.1038/s41392-021-00484-9
  6. Progress in tumor-associated macrophage (TAM)-targeted therapeutics.
    Ngambenjawong C, Gustafson HH, Pun SH. · · 2017 · cited 659× · PMID 28449873 · DOI 10.1016/j.addr.2017.04.010
  7. Tumor-associated macrophages: from basic research to clinical application.
    Yang L, Zhang Y. · · 2017 · cited 654× · PMID 28241846 · DOI 10.1186/s13045-017-0430-2
  8. Targeting M2-like tumor-associated macrophages is a potential therapeutic approach to overcome antitumor drug resistance.
    Wang S, Wang J, Chen Z, Luo J, et al · · 2024 · cited 406× · PMID 38341519 · DOI 10.1038/s41698-024-00522-z

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Pancreatic Cancer

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other AmMax Bio, Inc. trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02713529.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing