Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT02710422: MMEP

Miami Membrane for Potency (MMEP) Trial

Terminated Phase 2 Results posted Last updated 11 September 2019
What this trial tests

Phase 2 trial testing Amniotic Membrane Placement in Prostate Cancer in 24 participants. Terminated before completion.

Timeline
17 May 2016
Primary endpoint
22 January 2019
22 January 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Miami
PhasePhase 2
StatusTerminated
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment24
Start date17 May 2016
Primary completion22 January 2019
Estimated completion22 January 2019
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Miami

Who can join

Adults 40 to 80, male only, with Prostate Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

The Difference in Average Change in SHIM Score, Between Baseline and 12-Months Post-RARP, of Study Participants in Each Group Primary · Baseline, 12 Months Post-RARP

The difference in average change in Sexual History Inventory for Men (SHIM) score, between baseline and 12 months post RARP between the membrane and control arms will be assessed as the primary endpoint. The SHIM score is measured in points on a scale: The minimum score is 5 to 7 indicating severe erectile dysfunction (ED), the maximum score is 22 to 25, indicating no ED.

GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1 - Amniotic Membrane Placement10± 12.288
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement13.33± 6.429
Proportion of Men in Each Group With Mild Erectile Dysfunction (ED) or Better Post-RARP Secondary · Baseline, 3, 6, 9 12 Months Post-RARP

Among men with a SHIM greater than or equal to 17 at baseline, the investigators will compare the proportion of men in each group with mild ED or better, defined by a SHIM greater than or equal to 17, at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post RARP.

Mild or Better ED, Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1 - Amniotic Membrane Placement100
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement100
Mild or Better ED, 3 months
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1 - Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Mild or Better ED, 6 months
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1 - Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Mild or Better ED, 9 months
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1 - Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Mild or Better ED, 12 months
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1 - Amniotic Membrane Placement66.67
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Proportion of Men in Each Group Who Are Able to Achieve An Erection Sufficient for Intercourse More the 50% of the Time Post-RARP. Secondary · Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months Post-RARP

Among men with a SHIM greater than or equal to 17 at baseline, the investigators will compare the proportion of men in each group who are able to achieve an erection sufficient for intercourse more than 50% of the time at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post RARP.

3 months
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1 - Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement0
6 months
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1 - Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement0
9 months
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1 - Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement0
12 months
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1 - Amniotic Membrane Placement66.67
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Proportion of Men Who Require the Use of More Invasive Erectile Aids Post-RARP Secondary · 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months Post-RARP

Among men with a SHIM greater than or equal to 17 at baseline, the investigators will evaluate the proportion of men who require the use of more invasive erectile aids (intra-cavernosal injection, vacuum pump, or penile prosthesis) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post RARP.

3 months Post-RARP
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1: Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Arm 2: No Amniotic Membrane Placement0
6 months Post-RARP
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1: Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Arm 2: No Amniotic Membrane Placement0
9 months Post-RARP
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1: Amniotic Membrane Placement0
Arm 2: No Amniotic Membrane Placement33.33
12 months Post-RARP
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1: Amniotic Membrane Placement66.67
Arm 2: No Amniotic Membrane Placement100
Rates of Urinary Control Experienced by Study Participants Secondary · Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months Post-RARP

Rates of urinary control as measured by no pads per day at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months,

No Pad Usage: Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1: Amniotic Membrane Placement100
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement100
No Pad Usage: 3 months post-RARP
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1: Amniotic Membrane Placement22.22
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement27.27
No Pad Usage: 6 months Post-RARP
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1: Amniotic Membrane Placement42.86
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement50
No Pad Usage: 9 months Post-RARP
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1: Amniotic Membrane Placement60
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement60
No Pad Usage: 12 months Post-RARP
GroupValue95% CI
Arm 1: Amniotic Membrane Placement100
Arm 2 - No Amniotic Membrane Placement33.33

Sponsor's own description

The use of dehydrated human amnionic membrane allograft improves erectile function recovery (as measured by (Sexual History Inventory for Men (SHIM) score) at 12 months after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compared to a control group with no allograft.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Prostate Cancer

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of Miami trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02710422.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing