Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT02656693: PROPS

Integrating Online Weight Management With Primary Care Support

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 5 November 2020
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Online weight management program in Obesity in 840 participants. Completed in 8 May 2019.

Timeline
19 July 2016
Primary endpoint
8 November 2018
8 May 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsorBrigham and Women's Hospital
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposehealth services research
Enrollment840
Start date19 July 2016
Primary completion8 November 2018
Estimated completion8 May 2019
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Who can join

Adults 20 to 70, any sex, with Obesity. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Change in Body Weight at 12 Months Primary · 12 months after the initial primary care visit

change in body weight from enrollment to 12 months

GroupValue95% CI
Usual Care-1.2-2.1 – -0.3
Online Program Only-1.9-2.6 – -1.1
Combined Intervention-3.1-3.7 – -2.5
Change in Body Weight at 6 Months Secondary · 6 months after the initial primary care visit

change in body weight from enrollment to 6 months

GroupValue95% CI
Usual Care-1.0-1.9 – -0.1
Online Program Only-2.1-2.8 – -1.5
Combined Intervention-2.9-3.5 – -2.3
Change in Body Weight at 18 Months Secondary · 18 months after the initial primary care visit

change in body weight from enrollment to 18 months

GroupValue95% CI
Usual Care-1.9-2.8 – -1.0
Online Program Only-1.1-2.0 – -0.3
Combined Intervention-2.8-3.5 – -2.0
Percent Weight Change at 6 Months Secondary · 6 months after the initial primary care visit

Percent weight change from enrollment to 6 months

GroupValue95% CI
Usual Care-1.0-1.9 – 0.03
Online Program Only-2.0-3.1 – -0.9
Combined Intervention-2.8-3.8 – -1.8
Percent Weight Change at 12-Months Secondary · 12 months after the initial primary care visit

Percent weight change from enrollment to 12 months

GroupValue95% CI
Usual Care-1.4-2.3 – -0.6
Online Program Only-1.9-2.8 – -1.0
Combined Intervention-3.0-3.8 – -2.1
Percent Weight Change at 18-Months Secondary · 18 months after the initial primary care visit

Percent weight change from enrollment to 18 months

GroupValue95% CI
Usual Care-1.9-2.9 – -0.9
Online Program Only-0.9-2.0 – 0.2
Combined Intervention-2.6-3.6 – -1.5
Percent of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss at 6 Months Secondary · 6-months after the initial primary care visit

Percent of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss from enrollment to 6 months

GroupValue95% CI
Usual Care13.47.8 – 19.0
Online Program Only22.114.2 – 30.0
Combined Intervention29.521.4 – 37.5
Percent of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss at 12-months Secondary · 12 months after the initial primary care visit

Percent of Patients with at least 5% weight loss from enrollment to 12 months

GroupValue95% CI
Usual Care14.910.2 – 19.6
Online Program Only20.814.5 – 27.2
Combined Intervention32.325.8 – 38.8
Percent of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss at 18 Months Secondary · 18-months after the initial primary care visit

Percent of Patients With at least 5% weight loss from enrollment to 18 months

GroupValue95% CI
Usual Care20.914.3 – 27.6
Online Program Only19.912.5 – 27.3
Combined Intervention31.323.0 – 39.6
Changes in Self-efficacy Around Weight Loss at 12 Months Secondary · 12 months after initial primary care visit

Changes in self-efficacy around weight loss at 12 months Self-efficacy will be assessed by asking patients to rate their confidence in their ability to lose weight on a scale from 1 ("not at all confident") to 10 ("very confident"). A rank of 1-7 reflects low self-efficacy, while 8-10 reflects high self-efficacy based on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy.

GroupValue95% CI
Usual Care-0.7-1.1 – -0.3
Online Program Only-0.4-0.9 – 0.07
Combined Intervention0.50.06 – 0.9
Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure Secondary · 12 months after the initial primary care visit

changes in systolic blood pressure (BP) from enrollment to 12 months

GroupValue95% CI
Usual Care-0.9-2.8 – 1.0
Online Program Only-3.0-5.4 – -0.6
Combined Intervention-0.2-2.3 – 1.9
Changes in Diastolic Blood Pressure Secondary · 12 months after the initial primary care visit

changes in diastolic blood pressure (BP) from enrollment to 12 months

GroupValue95% CI
Usual Care-1.0-2.2 – 0.3
Online Program Only-2.2-3.8 – -0.7
Combined Intervention-1.1-2.4 – 0.2

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Adverse event data were collected from the date of enrollment to 18 months (+/- 90 days) after enrollment in the study.. Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Usual Care
Serious: 12/326 (4%)
Deaths: 0/326
Online Program Only
Serious: 11/216 (5%)
Deaths: 0/216
Combined Intervention
Serious: 18/298 (6%)
Deaths: 1/298

Serious adverse events (23 terms)

ReactionSystemUsual CareOnline Program OnlyCombined Intervention
Prostate cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)Cardiac disorders
Heart attackCardiac disorders
PancreatitisEndocrine disorders
Bladder cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pulmonary embolismVascular disorders
AnginaCardiac disorders
Coronary arteriogramCardiac disorders
DyspneaCardiac disorders
GI bleedGastrointestinal disorders
EndocarditisInfections and infestations
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Endometrial cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Melanoma in situNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
HeadacheNervous system disorders
SeizureNervous system disorders
Alcohol use disorderPsychiatric disorders
DepressionPsychiatric disorders
Brain surgerySurgical and medical procedures
Spinal stenosis of lumbar regionSurgical and medical procedures
Transient ischemic attackVascular disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Prostate cancer, Breast cancer, Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), Heart attack, Pancreatitis, Bladder cancer, Pulmonary embolism, Angina.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02656693 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The goal of this project is to adapt an evidence-based online weight management program and integrate it with population management support from primary care practices. Investigators then will conduct a three-arm, cluster-randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of 1) the combined intervention (online weight management program plus population management support) with 2) the stand-alone online weight management program and with 3) usual care, among overweight and obese primary care patients with type 2 diabetes or hypertension. The specific aims are: 1. a. To adapt an online weight management program and integrate it with population management support, incorporating input from patients, primary care clinicians, and other stakeholders; afterward, investigators will acquire feedback on the positive and negative aspects of the intervention. b. To compare the effectiveness of the combined intervention (online weight management program plus population management support) with the stand-alone online program and with usual care. Hypothesis 1: The combined intervention will lead to greater weight loss at 12 months compared with the stand-alone online program and with usual care. 2. To identify mediators of the combined intervention and the stand-alone online program. Hypothesis 2: The effects of the combined intervention and the stand-alone online program on weight loss will be mediated by patients' level of engagement, changes in self-efficacy, and changes in diet and physical activity. 3. To explore whether the effectiveness of the combined intervention and the stand-alone weight management program varies by patient characteristics. Hypothesis 3: The interventions will be more effective among patients who are younger, white, and higher socioeconomic status, although the population management strategy may help to reduce these differences.

Publications & conference data

4 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Effect of an Online Weight Management Program Integrated With Population Health Management on Weight Change: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Baer HJ, Rozenblum R, De La Cruz BA, Orav EJ, et al · · 2020 · cited 38× · PMID 33141209 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2020.18977
  2. Integrating an online weight management program with population health management in primary care: Design, methods, and baseline data from the PROPS randomized controlled trial (Partnerships for Reducing Overweight and Obesity with Patient-centered Strategies).
    Baer HJ, De La Cruz BA, Rozenblum R, Nolido NV, et al · · 2020 · cited 7× · PMID 32428586 · DOI 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106026
  3. Primary Care Patients' and Providers' Perspectives about an Online Weight Management Program: a Qualitative Study.
    Rozenblum R, De La Cruz BA, Nolido NV, Adighibe I, et al · · 2019 · cited 6× · PMID 31152361 · DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05022-6
  4. Primary care patients' and providers' perspectives about an online weight management program integrated with population health management: Post-intervention qualitative results from the PROPS study.
    Rozenblum R, De La Cruz BA, Nolido NV, McNulty S, et al · · 2022 · PMID 37213741 · DOI 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100057

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Obesity

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Brigham and Women's Hospital trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02656693.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing