Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT02635009

Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy With or Without Hippocampal Avoidance in Limited Stage or Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

Completed Phase 2, PHASE3 Results posted Last updated 2 March 2026
What this trial tests

Phase 2, PHASE3 trial testing Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Carcinoma in 418 participants. Completed in 4 September 2025.

Timeline
22 December 2015
Primary endpoint
18 May 2023
4 September 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorNRG Oncology
PhasePhase 2, PHASE3
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposesupportive care
Enrollment418
Start date22 December 2015
Primary completion18 May 2023
Estimated completion4 September 2025
Sites285 locations across Canada, United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

NRG Oncology — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Carcinoma or Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Carcinoma. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Number of Participants With Deterioration in HVLT-R Delayed Recall Score at Six Months (Phase III) Primary · Baseline and six months

The HVLT-R delayed recall test assesses verbal learning and memory. The test involves memorizing a list of 12 nouns for 3 consecutive trials to recall after a 20-minute delay. The score is the sum of the number of words correctly recalled and ranges from 0 to 36, with a higher score indicating better functioning. Deterioration is defined a decrease from baseline of at least 3 points.

GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT (Arm 1)33
PCI With HA Using IMRT (Arm 2)27
Number of Participants With Intracranial Relapse at 12 Months (Phase II) Primary · From baseline to 12 months

Intracranial relapse, defined as the development of a new brain metastasis as documented on brain MRI with contrast or head CT with contrast.

GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT (Arm 1)16
PCI With HA Using IMRT (Arm 2)12
Percentage of Participants With Neurocognitive Failure (Phase III) Secondary · Randomization to date of failure, death, or last known follow-up whichever occurred first. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 7.2 years.

Neurocognitive failure is defined as the first instance of neurocognitive decline in any of six assessments, as determined my reliable change index: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Total Recall, HVLT-R Delayed Recall, HVLT-R Delayed Recognition, Trail Making Test (TMT) part A, TMT part B, and Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA). Failure time is defined as time from randomization to failure, death (competing event), or last follow-up (censored). Neurocognitive failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The distributions of failure times are compared, wh

GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT57.049.6 – 63.8
PCI With HA Using IMRT52.745.3 – 59.5
Number of Participants With Deterioration in HVLT-R Total Recall Score (Phase III) Secondary · Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months.

The HVLT-R Total Recall score assesses verbal learning and memory. The test involves memorizing a list of 12 nouns for 3 consecutive trials. Raw score is the sum of the number of targets correctly recalled, ranging from 0 to 36. Higher score indicates better functioning. Deterioration is defined a decrease from baseline of at least 5 points.

3 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT47
PCI With HA Using IMRT47
6 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT33
PCI With HA Using IMRT35
12 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT20
PCI With HA Using IMRT17
Number of Participants With Deterioration in HVLT-R Total Recall Score (Phase III) Secondary · Baseline,18, 24 months.

he HVLT-R Total Recall score assesses verbal learning and memory. The test involves memorizing a list of 12 nouns for 3 consecutive trials. Raw score is the sum of the number of targets correctly recalled, ranging from 0 to 36. Higher score indicates better functioning. Deterioration is defined a decrease from baseline of at least 5 points.

18 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT (Arm 1)21
PCI With HA Using IMRT (Arm 2)22
24 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT (Arm 1)14
PCI With HA Using IMRT (Arm 2)15
Number of Participants With Deterioration in HVLT-R Delayed Recall Score (Phase III) Secondary · Baseline, 3, 12 months.

The HVLT-R Delayed Recall test assesses verbal learning and memory. After memorizing a list of 12 nouns for 3 consecutive trials, this test requires recalling the 12 targets after a 20-minute delay. Raw scores are sum of the number of targets correctly recalled. The score ranges from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates better functioning. Deterioration is defined a decrease from baseline of at least 3 points. Six-month results are reported as the primary endpoint.

3 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT40
PCI With HA Using IMRT34
12 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT23
PCI With HA Using IMRT19
Number of Participants With Deterioration in HVLT-R Delayed Recall Score (Phase III) Secondary · Baseline, 18, 24 months.

The HVLT-R Delayed Recall test assesses verbal learning and memory. After memorizing a list of 12 nouns for 3 consecutive trials, this test requires recalling the 12 targets after a 20-minute delay. Raw scores are sum of the number of targets correctly recalled. The score ranges from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates better functioning. Deterioration is defined a decrease from baseline of at least 3 points.

18 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT (Arm 1)16
PCI With HA Using IMRT (Arm 2)25
24 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT (Arm 1)18
PCI With HA Using IMRT (Arm 2)12
Number of Participants With Deterioration in HVLT-R Delayed Recognition Score (Phase III) Secondary · Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months.

The HVLT-R Delayed Recognition assesses verbal learning and memory. After memorizing a list of 12 nouns for 3 consecutive trials and recalling the 12 targets after a 20-minute delay, the test involves then identifying the 12 targets from a list of semantically related or unrelated items (delayed recognition). Raw scores are the sum of targets incorrectly identified subtracted from the sum of the number of targets correctly identified. The score ranges from -12 to 12 for recognition. A higher score indicates better functioning. Deterioration is defined a decrease from baseline of at least 2 poi

3 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT49
PCI With HA Using IMRT45
6 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT11
PCI With HA Using IMRT11
12 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT19
PCI With HA Using IMRT22
Number of Participants With Deterioration in HVLT-R Delayed Recognition Score (Phase III) Secondary · Baseline, 18, 24 months.

The HVLT-R Delayed Recognition assesses verbal learning and memory. After memorizing a list of 12 nouns for 3 consecutive trials and recalling the 12 targets after a 20-minute delay, the test involves then identifying the 12 targets from a list of semantically related or unrelated items (delayed recognition). Raw scores are the sum of targets incorrectly identified subtracted from the sum of the number of targets correctly identified. The score ranges from -12 to 12 for recognition. A higher score indicates better functioning. Deterioration is defined a decrease from baseline of at least 2 poi

18 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT (Arm 1)13
PCI With HA Using IMRT (Arm 2)12
24 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT (Arm 1)12
PCI With HA Using IMRT (Arm 2)3
Number of Participants With Deterioration in Trail Making Test (TMT) Part A (Phase III) Secondary · Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months.

The TMT is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching that can provide information about visual search speed, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and executive functioning. Subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible while still maintaining accuracy. There are two parts to the test: in the first (Part A, reported here), the targets are all numbers (1, 2, 3, etc.) and the test taker needs to connect them in sequential order. The score is the amount of time, in seconds, that it takes the patient to complete the maze. The range for

3 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT27
PCI With HA Using IMRT30
6 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT21
PCI With HA Using IMRT26
12 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT22
PCI With HA Using IMRT14
Number of Participants With Deterioration in Trail Making Test (TMT) Part A (Phase III) Secondary · Baseline, 18, 24 months.

The TMT is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching that can provide information about visual search speed, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and executive functioning. Subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible while still maintaining accuracy. There are two parts to the test: in the first (Part A, reported here), the targets are all numbers (1, 2, 3, etc.) and the test taker needs to connect them in sequential order. The score is the amount of time, in seconds, that it takes the patient to complete the maze. The range for

18 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT (Arm 1)15
PCI With HA Using IMRT (Arm 2)13
24 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT (Arm 1)15
PCI With HA Using IMRT (Arm 2)9
Number of Participants With Deterioration in TMT Part B Score (Phase III) Secondary · Baseline, 3, 6, 12 months.

The TMT is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching that can provide information about visual search speed, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and executive functioning. Subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible while still maintaining accuracy. There are two parts to the test: in the second part (Part B, reported here), the subject alternates between numbers and letters (1, A, 2, B, etc.). The score is the amount of time, in seconds, that it takes the patient to complete the maze. The score range for Part B is 0 to 300 (5

3 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT43
PCI With HA Using IMRT38
6 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT26
PCI With HA Using IMRT38
12 months
GroupValue95% CI
PCI Using 3DCRT22
PCI With HA Using IMRT19

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Baseline to last known follow-up or death. Maximum follow-up time was 7.2 years.. Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

PCI Using 3DCRT
Serious: 26/191 (14%)
Deaths: 118/196
PCI With HA Using IMRT
Serious: 17/189 (9%)
Deaths: 112/197

Serious adverse events (78 terms)

ReactionSystemPCI Using 3DCRTPCI With HA Using IMRT
Lung infectionInfections and infestations
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
FatigueGeneral disorders and administration site conditions
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
HyponatremiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Blood and lymphatic system disorders - OtherBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Edema limbsGeneral disorders and administration site conditions
Gait disturbanceGeneral disorders and administration site conditions
Infections and infestations - OtherInfections and infestations
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations
Weight lossInvestigations
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Generalized muscle weaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ConfusionPsychiatric disorders
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
HypoxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
HypertensionVascular disorders
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders
Other adverse events (38 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemPCI Using 3DCRTPCI With HA Using IMRT
FatigueGeneral disorders and administration site conditions
HeadacheNervous system disorders
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DizzinessNervous system disorders
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Memory impairmentNervous system disorders
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Dermatitis radiationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Weight lossInvestigations
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Hearing impairedEar and labyrinth disorders
Blurred visionEye disorders
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations
Generalized muscle weaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders
PainGeneral disorders and administration site conditions
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders
Gait disturbanceGeneral disorders and administration site conditions
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathyNervous system disorders
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations
DepressionPsychiatric disorders
TinnitusEar and labyrinth disorders
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders
Productive coughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
ConfusionPsychiatric disorders
PneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
AmnesiaNervous system disorders
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Lung infection, Anemia, Abdominal pain, Constipation, Nausea, Vomiting, Fatigue, Anorexia.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02635009 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This randomized phase II/III trial studies how well whole-brain radiation therapy works and compares it with or without hippocampal avoidance in treating patients with small cell lung cancer that is found in one lung, the tissues between the lungs, and nearby lymph nodes only (limited stage) or has spread outside of the lung in which it began or to other parts of the body (extensive stage). Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. The hippocampus is part of the brain that is important for memory. Avoiding the hippocampus during whole-brain radiation could decrease the chance of side effects on memory and thinking. It is not yet known whether giving whole-brain radiation therapy is more effective with or without hippocampal avoidance in treating patients with small cell lung cancer.

Publications & conference data

8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Evolution or Revolution?
    Brown PD, Ahluwalia MS, Khan OH, Asher AL, et al · · 2018 · cited 160× · PMID 29272161 · DOI 10.1200/jco.2017.75.9589
  2. Radiation and Systemic Therapy for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
    Bogart JA, Waqar SN, Mix MD. · · 2022 · cited 88× · PMID 34985935 · DOI 10.1200/jco.21.01639
  3. Recent advances in managing brain metastasis.
    Kotecha R, Gondi V, Ahluwalia MS, Brastianos PK, et al · · 2018 · cited 67× · PMID 30473769 · DOI 10.12688/f1000research.15903.1
  4. A prospective evaluation of hippocampal radiation dose volume effects and memory deficits following cranial irradiation.
    Ma TM, Grimm J, McIntyre R, Anderson-Keightly H, et al · · 2017 · cited 57× · PMID 29128167 · DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.035
  5. Prophylactic cranial irradiation after definitive chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer: Do all patients benefit?
    Farooqi AS, Holliday EB, Allen PK, Wei X, et al · · 2017 · cited 52× · PMID 28073578 · DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.11.012
  6. Management of brain metastases in lung cancer: evolving roles for radiation and systemic treatment in the era of targeted and immune therapies.
    Myall NJ, Yu H, Soltys SG, Wakelee HA, et al · · 2021 · cited 36× · PMID 34859233 · DOI 10.1093/noajnl/vdab106
  7. What is the role of radiotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in the immunotherapy era?
    Nesbit EG, Leal TA, Kruser TJ. · · 2019 · cited 31× · PMID 31673520 · DOI 10.21037/tlcr.2019.05.01
  8. Prophylactic cranial irradiation in small-cell lung cancer: update on patient selection, efficacy and outcomes.
    Manapov F, Käsmann L, Roengvoraphoj O, Dantes M, et al · · 2018 · cited 27× · PMID 30323698 · DOI 10.2147/lctt.s137577

Verify or expand the search:

Other NRG Oncology trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02635009.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing